Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Doctor Who Series 10

I hope Mrs Contreras (some of the papers seem to have not heard she is married!) - will add an element of 'gravitas' to the series. It may have started off as a cheesey BBC childrens hour spacemen and cardboard monsters program, but it is now a flagship franchise and deals with issues - the fight against terrorism across space and time etc.

The allegation of 'tokenism' could be avoided if the New Doctor had a 'backing troupe' of other female time travellers. Possibly, they could be from other parts of the country. Scotland, ( or if that is too much of a cliche) Ireland or the North of England?
You know that actors don't tend to like changing their names. Not to mention plenty of other women don't do so upon marriage.

And she is already from the north. The first from GOC.
 
All joking aside, I think this is a big improvement. People are only assuming the worst because Judi Dench is so shit as 'M'.
 
I guess there's a chance Colman didn't want it.

If they were going to go with younger, traditionally pretty then I'd have preferred Hayley Atwell (whom I believe expressed an interest, albeit in an off-handed kind of way). She can do comedy, is a great actor, already beloved on the con circuit, and is just all round absolutely fantastic and amazing and wonderful.
Now you've got me wanting a Dr. Who/Agent Carter crossover. It could happen couldn't it....it should happen!!!
 
what is there in the character that means it has to be a man? this change is perfectly canon. I've been a lifelong fan, watched back during the interregnum stuff that hadn't aired in my lifetime. Anyway my seal of rassilon tattoo gives me the authority to declare this a good choice. Even the crap Baker agrees
Reddit's Bloody Bill?

[/stalking] :D
 
I am amused and pleased today - she'll be a perfectly good Doc and it's a fine thing to see the bungle demographic spitting and snarling. But I can't see why they didn't go with Olivia Coleman, unless she did some dreadful screentest or something. Once they'd actually thought of her for the role and got her on the shortlist I literally can't think of a reason for not giving her the job. Too quirky?
I'm glad they didn't. She annoys the hell out of me, and I've no idea why. I'd have quite liked the Fleabag actor.
 
The writers are going to have to be really on their game to make this choice convincing.

There are going to be some really thorny obstacles to overcome. Like if The Doctor needs to save the world by growing a beard or scratching their nards.
 
I don't think I've ever seen this person in anything, but I'm pleased because a) not Kris Marshall, who is the worst thing possibly of all time and b) look at how sad and angry it's made so many dreadful idiots.

I'm not going to apologise for being pleased the 13th doctor is a woman. For me it sends the wrong message to find every other reason to be pleased than that. Being clear that it's important to fight for more high profile roles for women isn't something I'm ashamed of.
 
Not at all. It's the other way round, you don't want the character to be played by someone female because you're a prick.
So what does that make you then? As someone who is apparently unable to cope with the fact that someone thinks that a male that character that's been around for 54 years should be played by a man. And responds to such an opinion with abuse. What does that make you?
I'm not going to apologise for being pleased the 13th doctor is a woman. For me it sends the wrong message to find every other reason to be pleased than that. Being clear that it's important to fight for more high profile roles for women isn't something I'm ashamed of.
So "more high profile roles for women" means misappropriating great male characters and turning them into women does it?
 
So what does that make you then? As someone who is apparently unable to cope with the fact that someone thinks that a male that character that's been around for 54 years should be played by a man. And responds to such an opinion with abuse. What does that make you?

So "more high profile roles for women" means misappropriating great male characters and turning them into women does it?

It just means playing to a perception. And it is far easier to 'appropriate' than engage in a 'shoulda, coulda, woulda' debate.
 
Back
Top Bottom