MickiQ
In My Defence I was left Unsupervised
The enviromental arguments are the most valid since that is the primary argument behind introducing this charge anyway, It was suggested as a way to discourage people from placing unnecessary orders thus causing unnecessary pollution. We can get as cynical as we want about whatever the real reasons might be but that is what it is being sold as.
The argument that Marty1 trucking around the North East with a van with 250 parcels in it following an optimised route is more environmentally friendly than 250 cars making 250 journeys to 250 different places is a very sound one (which does indeed make one wonder about the real reason).
As well as the total number of miles being covered almost certainly being a lot less, there's also the fact that the van needs to get warm just once. My car has a trip computer that tells me it's MPG at a given time. When I start it from cold, it's only doing 10-12 mpg, by the time, I get off the estate it's up to about 24-25 mpg. I've got to be on the dual carriageway 3 or 4 miles from home by the time it's optimal, so even if a lot of those 250 journeys a short it's far from good from a pollution point of view.
The argument that Marty1 trucking around the North East with a van with 250 parcels in it following an optimised route is more environmentally friendly than 250 cars making 250 journeys to 250 different places is a very sound one (which does indeed make one wonder about the real reason).
As well as the total number of miles being covered almost certainly being a lot less, there's also the fact that the van needs to get warm just once. My car has a trip computer that tells me it's MPG at a given time. When I start it from cold, it's only doing 10-12 mpg, by the time, I get off the estate it's up to about 24-25 mpg. I've got to be on the dual carriageway 3 or 4 miles from home by the time it's optimal, so even if a lot of those 250 journeys a short it's far from good from a pollution point of view.