Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Daine Abbot supports John McDonell's nomination for leader

ViolentPanda said:
In both Abbott and Marshall-Andrews' case it's borne out by their own constituents (not just local party members) praise of them.
If you can't come up with something a little more solid then don't bother, balders. Really, don't.

He must be better than the opposition, and that's all that matters to his constituents, idiot.
Click to expand...

Your reasoning is typical of somebody with your conformist politics....Shit..

You really think that people in Abbotts and BMAs constituencies think there really good MPs? I wonder how many you have talked too? People vote Labour despite them not cos of them they are both egotistical and shallow, which is something you have in common with them.
 
guinnessdrinker said:
do you actually know what you write sometimes?
Click to expand...

Sometimes it gets a bit boring for me with the really closed minds like VP and nino etc...Calling people coconuts has got other people to contribute. And i have to say the more the merrier.
Bit suprised that some of these people seem very nieve about Diane Abbott.
But its good to have the debate in a way.
 
I haven't seen you debating, tbaldwin - I have mostly just seen you making offensive remarks.

But perhaps that is my naivety in not being able to read beyond your narrowmindness and stated arrogance :D
 
Guineveretoo said:
I haven't seen you debating, tbaldwin - I have mostly just seen you making offensive remarks.

But perhaps that is my naivety in not being able to read beyond your narrowmindness and stated arrogance :D
Click to expand...

What exactly did you want me to debate?
The thread is on a particularly shit mps support of John Mcdonells candidacy.
If i was him i would do all i could to distance myself from people like Abbott.
She is an absulute shit MP who retains her seat only cos she stands for Labour. If she stood as an Independent at the next election i doubt if she would get more than 200 votes.
 
tbaldwin said:
Your reasoning is typical of somebody with your conformist politics....Shit..

You really think that people in Abbotts and BMAs constituencies think there really good MPs? I wonder how many you have talked too? People vote Labour despite them not cos of them they are both egotistical and shallow, which is something you have in common with them.
Click to expand...

That's right balders, on with the insults, and don't bother trying to reply to the issue.

Always the same, tirades, great torrents of bullshit, and still you say fuck-all of substance. you schlemiel.
 
ViolentPanda said:
That's right balders, on with the insults, and don't bother trying to reply to the issue.

Always the same, tirades, great torrents of bullshit, and still you say fuck-all of substance. you schlemiel.
Click to expand...

Sorry i thought the issue was DA supporting John McDonell and i think ive said what i think of that.
 
tbaldwin said:
What exactly did you want me to debate?
The thread is on a particularly shit mps support of John Mcdonells candidacy.
If i was him i would do all i could to distance myself from people like Abbott.
She is an absulute shit MP who retains her seat only cos she stands for Labour. If she stood as an Independent at the next election i doubt if she would get more than 200 votes.
Click to expand...

I don't want you to debate anything. I was merely responding to your suggestion that you are doing so :)
 
Noun 1. schlemiel - (Yiddish) a dolt who is a habitual bungler
shlemiel

simpleton, simple - a person lacking intelligence or common sense
 
guinnessdrinker said:
it describes balders very well, indeed:D
Click to expand...

Im not so sure about that......
I prefer to think of myself as open and honest.A cynical optimist. A lovely person. well loved by the people who know him best..etc etc.
 
MC5 said:
Noun 1. schlemiel - (Yiddish) a dolt who is a habitual bungler
shlemiel

simpleton, simple - a person lacking intelligence or common sense
Click to expand...

There are a couple of other Yiddish words that I like too.

Schmuck
Schnook (one of my Dad's favourites)
Schmo (this describes a certain person to a tee!)
 
treelover said:
This is really sad news, what is it with the left, of all stripes, can it ever get itself together
Click to expand...

Your whining question about "the left" presupposes that Meacher is, or ever has been, "left".

left of Margaret Thatcher, maybe, but except for his very early days he's been a centrist right down the line.
 
ViolentPanda said:
Your whining question about "the left" presupposes that Meacher is, or ever has been, "left".

left of Margaret Thatcher, maybe, but except for his very early days he's been a centrist right down the line.
Click to expand...

Meacher was the "hard Left" candidate for the Labour Party deputy leadership (on a Heffer-Meacher ticket) in 1983, whilst Benn was out of parliament. Is that what you meant by his "very early days"?
 
Geoff Collier said:
Meacher was the "hard Left" candidate for the Labour Party deputy leadership (on a Heffer-Meacher ticket) in 1983, whilst Benn was out of parliament. Is that what you meant by his "very early days"?
Click to expand...

"Hard left"? So hard left he was a minister under Wilson and Callaghan and voted mostly with the govt even when it wasn't in "the peoples'" interest, eh? :)

I mean his student days, back before he pretended to be the offspring of a horny handed son of the soil in order to strengthen his "left" credibility.

The man's a chameleon. He's whatever'll get him power, left, right or centrist.
 
ViolentPanda said:
"Hard left"? So hard left he was a minister under Wilson and Callaghan and voted mostly with the govt even when it wasn't in "the peoples'" interest, eh? :)

I mean his student days, back before he pretended to be the offspring of a horny handed son of the soil in order to strengthen his "left" credibility.

The man's a chameleon. He's whatever'll get him power, left, right or centrist.
Click to expand...
:rolleyes:
This is good from someone who was allegedly happy to serve in the British Army and then in the Home Office.
 
becky p said:
:rolleyes:
This is good from someone who was allegedly happy to serve in the British Army and then in the Home Office.
Click to expand...
Your point is?

Are you ever going to post something that isn't a snide dig?

I have my doubts. Over a hundred posts, and still not even a smidgeon of substance to any of them, eh becky?
 
invisibleplanet said:
Only 135 posts and she knows how to nasty.
Click to expand...

That ain't "nasty", that's n.f.b.


(normal for becky). She's very good at passing judgement on others, but not too hot at actually debating or contributing anything worthwhile, even when she's been asked to.

Lots.
 
ViolentPanda said:
Your point is?

Are you ever going to post something that isn't a snide dig?

I have my doubts. Over a hundred posts, and still not even a smidgeon of substance to any of them, eh becky?
Click to expand...

My point is that people in glass houses should not be throwing stones.:p

As for snide remarks and lack of substance?

Your measure of people seems to be on how much they agree with you and a few other equally pretentious and obnoxious posters.:)
 
becky p said:
My point is that people in glass houses should not be throwing stones.:p
Click to expand...
Yet you've been throwing stones since your first post, haven't you?
As for snide remarks and lack of substance?

Your measure of people seems to be on how much they agree with you and a few other equally pretentious and obnoxious posters.:)
Click to expand...

My measure of people is how well they're able to support their contentions, argue their case. It's something most of the posters on Urban are able to do.

I don't care if someone disagrees with me, I'm not G-d, I don't pretend to be all-knowing or wrothful if contradicted. I do prefer people to be able to make a case beyond "you're this or that" when they disagree though. It makes things more interesting, and shows that they know something about what they're talking about, whereas you and your interminable "you seem" and "you appear" followed by your character projections of posters...

Well, lets just say you don't make the cut.
 
becky p said:
My point is that people in glass houses should not be throwing stones.:p

As for snide remarks and lack of substance?

Your measure of people seems to be on how much they agree with you and a few other equally pretentious and obnoxious posters.:)
Click to expand...

You could do with learning these lessons yourself. :p

If you can't get the better of someone in a discussion, this is what you do. The sad thing about it all, is that you betray your own deepseated ignorance of the issues. You run with your crew, you have no thoughts of your own. Taking your cues from baldwin and durutti will only lead you deeper into the black hole of ignorance.
 
tbaldwin said:
Im not so sure about that......
I prefer to think of myself as open and honest.A cynical optimist. A lovely person. well loved by the people who know him best..etc etc.
Click to expand...

Nah, In my opinion you're both a schmo and a schnook and you talk out of your tuchus. :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

F
RIP John Prescott
2 3
Replies
61
Views
2K
seeformiles
seeformiles
Bingoman
Sue Gray and therese Coffey nominated for a peerage
2 3 4
Replies
91
Views
2K
stavros
S
P
Sara Sharif murder: ‘sadist’ father and stepmother jailed for life
16 17 18 19 20
Replies
593
Views
16K
e.g.g.
e.g.g.
ska invita
A new mass party of the left (Jan 2025 edition)! Collective / Fightback
2
Replies
53
Views
1K
Elohim
E
Serene
Premier League footballer avoids ban for writing ‘I Love Jesus’ on LGBT armband
2 3 4
Replies
97
Views
3K
Lotte
L
Back
Top Bottom