That’s not what they were responding toI think Hyperdark is referencing the activation of anti-tumour activity by Covid infection, rather than the deaths of an entire ICU?
I think Hyperdark is referencing the activation of anti-tumour activity by Covid infection, rather than the deaths of an entire ICU?
I really hope so. I was struggling to find a charitable explanation, but that would be it.Makes sense, and they made a simple mistake about which tweet someone elses reply was in regard to.
Fucking hell!
I think Hyperdark is referencing the activation of anti-tumour activity by Covid infection, rather than the deaths of an entire ICU?
Yes I was referencing the tweet before...the Wrong Tweet, apologies it looked like the fucking hell was a response to the post prceeding it, I dont actually see tweets without copying and pasting URLs due my anti-twatter settings so I sometimes miss them (Note: No angry shouty twats were harmed in this message)
Yes I was referencing the tweet before...the Wrong Tweet, apologies it looked like the fucking hell was a response to the post prceeding it, I dont actually see tweets without copying and pasting URLs due my anti-twatter settings so I sometimes miss them (Note: No angry shouty twats were harmed in this message)
Apparently two suspected organiser of the NYE rave in France might face up to 10 years in jail (probably just prosecutors bluster though)Meanwhile the underground party scene in LA is carrying on regardless:
Threats and Restrictions Aren't Putting a Damper on L.A.'s Rule-Flouting Underground Party Scene
As virus cases and casualties spike throughout the region, furtive dance clubs have continued to operate and thrive with little law enforcement interventionwww.lamag.com
Or, it's not actually all that much to do with the rules, and more to do with geography.The Australian government is as inept, corrupt and right wing as the uk government. But even so there's a subtle cultural contrast that's made for a different lockdown narrative.
Obviously there's huge differences in covid transmission due to the space and weather we have here, but still, when and where a hard lockdown's necessary our idea of essential services, lockdown rules, and the consequences for breaking them has been much tighter than the UK.
I'm wondering if this is because the government have more confidence in applying stricter rules, because they know from our regular large disasters that the population have the resilience and necessary solidarity to follow them.
Or, it's not actually all that much to do with the rules, and more to do with geography.
Spain also had very strict lockdown rules as I understand it.
I know. But there are other countries which had similarly hard lockdown rules yet saw a much worse outcome. Spain being an example. Perhaps Australia's timing of the lockdown was better, and significant, and that could be to do with the government but it could also be a consequence of geography.Yes, I get what your saying about the geography ( I think) but I'm not talking about the rate of transmission but the governments capacity/ confidence to make harder lockdown rules.
I know. But there are other countries which had similarly hard lockdown rules yet saw a much worse outcome. Spain being an example. Perhaps Australia's timing of the lockdown was better, and significant, and that could be to do with the government but it could also be a consequence of geography.
To be clear, when I say geography I'm not mainly talking about how spaced out people are, I mean things like controllability of borders and the number of people travelling to and from other locations.
one day boris johnson will have a conviction^^^Interesting. I guess here in the UK it's not been so much lack of confidence as lack of conviction on the part of Boris Johnson. The remark about the "freedom-loving British people" as opposed to the rule-following continental Europeans. Even in last Monday's (or whenever it was - the coronacalendar is getting a bit blurry) lockdown address, he couldn't help himself saying - and later tweeting - that he was sure that the British public was sick of getting more government instructions around this. When my perception was that the opposite is true - people were desperate to see some leadership, and for measures that would actually bring the situation under control.
Having said that, when it all started back in spring, I was admittedly also wondering how well people would follow it, also perceiving the national spirit, if there is such a thing, to be a bit more rebellious than in say, Germany. So I don't know how well restrictive measures would have flown if the situation wrt threat of death to loved ones and threat to the healthcare system hadn't been so grave, then and now.