Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Corbyn & Cabinet in the Media

Possibly the single biggest thing about Corbyn's approach to leadership has been to insist that it is not all about him, and that disagreement is possible. Clearly some people don't want that - they want to be told what to do.
Not if they have no faith in the person giving the orders they don't. Corbyn's made this leadership all about him and it's not working.
 
Read your history. Those who praise Caesar are usually the ones who try to shiv him.
I know but I was trying to state the obvious. I don't why as it hasn't worked so far. I still don't see why the proposition that the public are not seeing Jeremy Corbyn as the next PM is at all controversial.

This article by Blairite Red Tory neo-liberal traitors just tells what any CLP is reporting back Labour ‘not winning back swing voters’ under Jeremy Corbyn
 
Not if they have no faith in the person giving the orders they don't. Corbyn's made this leadership all about him and it's not working.

What? He has made decision making much more collective than any previous Labour leader of recent times. People have been free to openly dissent; the tragedy is that they have used that to advance causes that are daft.
 
Not if they have no faith in the person giving the orders they don't. Corbyn's made this leadership all about him and it's not working.

Corbyn hasn't made it "all about him". His opponents in the PLP have. :facepalm:
Corbyn has made it very clear from the get-go that "it's all about the party", that is the broader membership, and not just the tossers in Parliament, and the tossers in Parliament (and their neoliberal supporters in the media and business) won't tolerate that - re-empowering constituencies to select and to discipline sitting MPs scares the people I've mentioned. MPs because they'd have to toe a local line, rather than a PLP line, business because it's harder to suborn a party structure than a single member, and the media because collective power - and collective responsibility - is anathema to how the proprietors see the world.
 
What? He has made decision making much more collective than any previous Labour leader of recent times. People have been free to openly dissent; the tragedy is that they have used that to advance causes that are daft.
It is a tragedy, that's why you act like a leader and read the riot act instead of a chairman of a committee. A good leader works all this stuff out one way or the other. Jeremy hasn't.
 
It is a tragedy, that's why you act like a leader and read the riot act instead of a chairman of a committee.

That isn't the way leaders act, especially when they and their enemies know that their Riot Act isn't backed up by anything.
 
Corbyn hasn't made it "all about him". His opponents in the PLP have. :facepalm:
Corbyn has made it very clear from the get-go that "it's all about the party", that is the broader membership, and not just the tossers in Parliament, and the tossers in Parliament (and their neoliberal supporters in the media and business) won't tolerate that - re-empowering constituencies to select and to discipline sitting MPs scares the people I've mentioned.
It probably does if their CLP is going to be full of people that seriously believe Jeremy Corbyn is going to be PM. Besides grass roots democracy is banana republic baloney to allow executive demagogues to grab arbitrary power from legislators. I may be advocating decisive leadership but not without checks and balances.
 
It probably does if their CLP is going to be full of people that seriously believe Jeremy Corbyn is going to be PM. Besides grass roots democracy is banana republic baloney to allow executive demagogues to grab arbitrary power from legislators. I may be advocating decisive leadership but not without checks and balances.

You really don't see the contradictions between what you want, and lived reality, do you?
 
Not if they have no faith in the person giving the orders they don't. Corbyn's made this leadership all about him and it's not working.

Another example of you just saying stuff with no evidence; what has Corbyn (as opposed to other people) done to make it all about him?

It's almost like you want/need this to be true...which is frankly a bit weird.

Cheers - Louis MacNeice
 
Besides grass roots democracy is banana republic baloney to allow executive demagogues to grab arbitrary power from legislators.

You really have a deep seated mistrust of your own and other people's abilities; no wonder you seem to crave the hand of firm leadership. You're selling yourself and the rest of us short, and in doing so wasting so much potential.

Cheers - Louis MacNeice
 
Another example of you just saying stuff with no evidence; what has Corbyn (as opposed to other people) done to make it all about him?

It's almost like you want/need this to be true...which is frankly a bit weird.

Cheers - Louis MacNeice
Corbyn had half a chance with some of Livingstone's canny team but even they're heading for the exit because he doesn't listen to advice. Neale Coleman walks out of Team Corbyn - and Simon Fletcher could be next

Just last week when the party had its referendum launch he would have been advised that the leader on CND march 'snub' would make the headlines if he went. But man-of-destiny Jeremy knows best.
 
Corbyn had half a chance with some of Livingstone's canny team but even they're heading for the exit because he doesn't listen to advice. Neale Coleman walks out of Team Corbyn - and Simon Fletcher could be next

Just last week when the party had its referendum launch he would have been advised that the leader on CND march 'snub' would make the headlines if he went. But man-of-destiny Jeremy knows best.

So no evidence that he's making it all about him, and plenty that others (including yourself in your own small way) are.

Cheers - Louis MacNeice
 
You really have a deep seated mistrust of your own and other people's abilities; no wonder you seem to crave the hand of firm leadership. You're selling yourself and the rest of us short, and in doing so wasting so much potential.

Cheers - Louis MacNeice
I believe in European parliamentary representative democracy over executive democracy of the Americas, what's wrong with that?
 
So no evidence that he's making it all about him, and plenty that others (including yourself in your own small way) are.

Cheers - Louis MacNeice
You're right about the evidence I don't have any 'all about him' pie charts to back me up. And it doesn't matter a shit what I think, it's not going to get anyone elected. If you've invested a lot of emotional faith in Corbyn it's hard to see that not everyone think's he's Robert Redford in the Candidate. Trust me, they don't, he's George McGovern.
 
Last edited:
If you dress like shit and haven't got the gift of the gab then you're not going to reach act 2; your policies. Because no one trusts your competence to run anything. Is this difficult stuff?
You omitted eating a bacon butty properly, which always means you eat it with a knife and fork like a pretentious, anally-retentive cunt.
 
if he'd made it about him we'd have been subjected to endless 'cult of personality' stalinist memes from dickheads in the press and on the internet. But you can see why the drive to claim it is still there, ho-ho he visited the DDR you know
 
Er, that's the sort of thing 'Desperate' Dan Hodges might say. I don't think he's personalised his leadership at all. That notion resides solely in the foetid minds of his detractors.
He's done the opposite. It is his opponents who have tried to make it all about him. Perhaps to cover up for their own failings over the past two decades.
 
I believe in European parliamentary representative democracy over executive democracy of the Americas, what's wrong with that?

"Parliamentary democracy", as practiced in the UK, is a contradiction in terms. There's nothing even vaguely democratic about a system that limits your say regarding political representation to once every five years nationally, once every four for locals.
As for "executive democracy", what do you think is being exercised here, every time a Parliamentary Instrument or The Parliament Act is used, rather than legislation being voted on? :facepalm:
 
if he'd made it about him we'd have been subjected to endless 'cult of personality' stalinist memes from dickheads in the press and on the internet. But you can see why the drive to claim it is still there, ho-ho he visited the DDR you know

So did I, and I dress scruffily! Reason enough to strip me of citizenship and deport me to a prison colony!
 
Trailing this shitty government by 7% is a pretty tricky task but Corbyn's managed it.

Yep. And as a result the conspiracy theorists and Corbynistas blame:

a) the media repeatedly
b) the public, for not agreeing with their "analysis" of capitalism
c) the pollsters, who must be wrong, because Corbyn can't be behind - this denial is the same as those who thought Miliband was doing OK because the Tories, the Tories, etc

Personally, I think almost all the people that are going to vote for Corbyn, have voted for him.
 
I like the look of Clive Lewis, Keir Starmer, Lisa Nandy, Tom Watson. But you never know who emerges in a contest. I didn't expect the last one would reveal that Burnham and Cooper had less leadership ability than a drunken slug. I'll even go for Dan Jarvis if he's up against Johnson and promises to stand stand on; "Vote for Dan because he's shot better men than Boris."
Not Lewis. He's naive to the point of being stupid.
 
c) the pollsters, who must be wrong, because Corbyn can't be behind
They were wrong at the GE as if that works in Labour's favour. And as these polls appear in Tory newspapers they must be lies from Tory polling companies commissioned by Tory editors

Another good one: a poll of Tory MPs showing that Dan Jarvis is the leader they most fear and Corbyn the least. 'Of course, they would say that' I was told it's a cunning Tory double bluff.
 
They were wrong at the GE as if that works in Labour's favour. And as these polls appear in Tory newspapers they must be lies from Tory polling companies commissioned by Tory editors

Another good one: a poll of Tory MPs showing that Dan Jarvis is the leader they most fear and Corbyn the least. 'Of course, they would say that' I was told it's a cunning Tory double bluff.
Odd this, given your reliance on polls for your argument. The only two elections thus far, you're a bit quiet on them.
 
Back
Top Bottom