magneze
🎧
"His stance has put him on a collision course with military chiefs, who have always been wary of political meddling"
The Military Chiefs don't quite understand who's in charge is would seem. Or the article is bollocks of course.
"His stance has put him on a collision course with military chiefs, who have always been wary of political meddling"
American officers on attachment to the RAF/Army/Royal Navy are forbidden to travel to the Falklands (they can fly over Syria in RAF aircraft, drop bombs, or serve in UK land units fighting in Iraq, or Afghanistan, but not travel to the FI...), and no American aircraft has ever handed in the FI - contrast that to Cyprus, where the USAF bases its U-2's...
There's at least one set of USAF wings on the 1435 crew room wall at MPA. I suppose it's possible he didn't know he wasn't supposed to go!
Maybe I should start typing your name as 'likesfash', eh?Nino savette
But is relevant to a thread on Corbyn and the media."His stance has put him on a collision course with military chiefs, who have always been wary of political meddling"
The Military Chiefs don't quite understand who's in charge is would seem. Or the article is bollocks of course.
(((hampshire)))Fuck the Falkland Islanders. This is one of those rare occasions on which I agree with Galloway: it would cost much less to resettle the islanders in Hampshire, where many of them have familial ties, that to keep them on the Falklands.
Your the one who likes the argies
Your the one who likes the argies
It will forever be the spring of 1982 for you, won't it?Your the one who likes the argies
It will forever be the spring of 1982 for you, won't it?
That's not really true. They want to negotiate and have made various offers. The UK refuses to enter any negotiations without first ruling out any discussion of sovereignty. Who is it that is being obstructive here?Argentina has done nothing to apologize or mend fences with either the UK or the islanders.
Realizing that the maintenance of colonial situations is
incompatible with the United Nations ideal of universal peace
out of curiosity, would you apply that same principle to the illegal jewish settlements in the west bank?Self determination is a UN principle the people who live their dont want to be argie until that changes argentina can go whistile.
unlike britain of course who scrupulously abides by all her international commitments.Self determination is a UN principle the people who live their dont want to be argie until that changes argentina can go whistile. That resolution was a general assembly its non binding,resolution 502 of the security council was and is and told argentina to gtfo the falklands.
Argentina has demanded the islands be handed over referred to the islanders as squatters pirates and non people attempted to impose a blockade refused to recognise the islanders as having any say in anything.
The un decolonisation committee has refused several times to visit the islands and so can be ignored.
Argentina is attempting to colonise the islands
Malvinas: when Argentina is strong and united, world public opinion will back us
This bloke nails it at the moment argentina is poor corrupt weak and noted for being untrustworthy in international relationships.
What a shit attitude you have. Turf people out of there homes for what? To save money? To please the Argentine state?Fuck the Falkland Islanders. This is one of those rare occasions on which I agree with Galloway: it would cost much less to resettle the islanders in Hampshire, where many of them have familial ties, that to keep them on the Falklands.
out of curiosity, would you apply that same principle to the illegal jewish settlements in the west bank?
Clearly such an idea is highly contingent. The people of a small village in mid-Wales cannot declare independence, put a rope around their fields, and appeal to the UN for support. People living on some small islands also are not in a position to demand that the UK spend £50k per person per year to defend them in perpetuity. They don't have an absolute right to self-determination - if the UK told them to come to the UK or face Argentine rule, they'd have little choice in the matter. And neither should they, necessarily. The wishes of the islanders are not the only consideration here. It's simplistic nonsense to talk as if they were - and the fate of Diego Garcia is an illustration of how their wishes are not the reason the UK defends the islands. Naive in the extreme to think that they are.Self determination is a UN principle the people who live their dont want to be argie until that changes argentina can go whistile. .
i think we can all agree on that: though we might name the country differentlyThis is purely an attempted resource grab by an already rich in land and resource rich country
This is purely an attempted resource grab by an already rich in land and resource rich country
Nino savette fuck the falkand islanders
B so nye in germany didnt happen then?
You are being deliberately disingenuous. We all know the british state doesn't give a fuck about the falkland islanders just like they don't give a fuck about the inhabitants of diego garcia so please stop with your condescending bullshit lecture. I support the rights of both peoples to live in their own homes on their own terms.The wishes of the islanders are not the only consideration here. It's simplistic nonsense to talk as if they were - and the fate of Diego Garcia is an illustration of how their wishes are not the reason the UK defends the islands. Naive in the extreme to think that they are.
Clearly such an idea is highly contingent. The people of a small village in mid-Wales cannot declare independence, put a rope around their fields, and appeal to the UN for support. People living on some small islands also are not in a position to demand that the UK spend £50k per person per year to defend them in perpetuity. They don't have an absolute right to self-determination - if the UK told them to come to the UK or face Argentine rule, they'd have little choice in the matter. And neither should they, necessarily. The wishes of the islanders are not the only consideration here. It's simplistic nonsense to talk as if they were - and the fate of Diego Garcia is an illustration of how their wishes are not the reason the UK defends the islands. Naive in the extreme to think that they are.
Long-term, this is an absurd situation, and the FIs need to foster economic and other links with the South American mainland. Going the full Ian Paisley on any of that just perpetuates the crap.
You mean the people who were born there and fought a war of independence against the imperial power?Y
Argentina's claim is idiotic when you merely consider the name 'Argentina' has a Spanish origin, named after the silver early colonialists found there. If anyone wants to roll back imperialism and colonialism then fine, do a thorough job Argentina and start at home..
You don't have to agree with it, but you should attempt to understand what the presence of a colonial European power in the South Atlantic means to many Latin Americans. They see that they themselves kicked out European masters in their wars of independence, much as their northern neighbours did, and they see issues such as the FIs as unfinished business. Understand as well why the British are called 'pirates' in LA. Because many islands around South America were used by British pirates for centuries, often with British government approval.
You mean the people who were born there and fought a war of independence against the imperial power?
People keep saying this, but it's bullshit. Coming from ex-imperial powers like the UK, it sounds fucking arrogant, too.
You mean the people who were born there and fought a war of independence against the imperial power?
People keep saying this, but it's bullshit. Coming from ex-imperial powers like the UK, it sounds fucking arrogant, too.
Maybe there is a more cooperative future possible but not with Argentina's stance. Their claim is not strong enough. It's hundreds of miles from them.