Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Corbyn & Cabinet in the Media

Admittedly I don't keep up with things so much these days, but I wasn't aware that 'mainstream media' had potentially negative connotations these days :hmm: I've always used it to refer to BBC, Sky, Guardian, Times, Mail, etc. as opposed to say Schnews, Indymedia, even Morning Star as being some sort of 'non mainstream' outlet?
 
Last edited:
Admittedly I don't keep up with things so much these days, but I wasn't aware that 'mainstream media' had potentially negative connotations these days :hmm: I've always used it to refer to BBC, Sky, Guardian, Times, Mail, etc. as opposed to say Schnews, Indymedia, even Morning Star as being some sort of 'non mainstream' outlet?
yeah its been stolen by conspiraloons and brit far righters
 
Well, that's what we're debating - how different people use "mainstream media" to mean different things.

well, as a non-conspiraloon, i'll happily say that i view anyone who uses 'mainstream media', and (tbh) 'elites', as a bit of a looper. its a sign. not perhaps as definative as 'sheeple', but its a sign that someone is on that road...
 
  • Like
Reactions: LDC
good for you. Many people do though, and it's worth considering which terms are going to make people roll their eyes and switch off, if only so you can communicate more effectively. You don't really need to persuade anyone who knows and understands Chomsky do you? If the common response to a certain term is 'probably a nutter', it's probably best to drop it.
 
good for you. Many people do though, and it's worth considering which terms are going to make people roll their eyes and switch off, if only so you can communicate more effectively. You don't really need to persuade anyone who knows and understands Chomsky do you? If the common response to a certain term is 'probably a nutter', it's probably best to drop it.

Is it common?

Sorry, but if one person's going to post what they feel about something as evidence of something, me posting how I feel about it is just as valid.
 
Yeah, and it's valid for me to respond to your post too. Isn't that how discussions work?
Well the evidence of this thread is that there are some who see conspiraloon connotations and others who don't. I would suggest that the majority of people don't pay any attention to Icke and truthers and the like.
 
well, as a non-conspiraloon, i'll happily say that i view anyone who uses 'mainstream media', and (tbh) 'elites', as a bit of a looper. its a sign. not perhaps as definative as 'sheeple', but its a sign that someone is on that road...

Similar to how I use the amount of badges someone is wearing as a sign of their unhinged/shit politics.

One badge = fine.
Two badges = hmmm, OK fair enough, but be careful.
Three badges = possibly getting into quite odd territory.
Loads of badges = quite obviously potty.

There's something about the size of badges and whether they're located on the clothes or a hat too, but that's getting into too much detail. ;)
 
They ignore them because they think they're mental. And they'll ignore you too, if you score too highly in the conspiraloon tropes stakes.

And they would be right to ignore [the hypothetical me]. Or anyone who doesn't make an effort to engage with people in a way that resonates with them.
 
Back
Top Bottom