Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Corbyn & Cabinet in the Media

Who the fuck cares?

I care a little bit. It's not a major thing like, it's just I would hope he knew he would get flak for not singing it, and be prepared for that. If (and I'm not sure he has) he's backed down over a days worth of critical headlines, then he may back down on lots of other stuff. Which would be a shame.
 
the shove of the photographer occurs first (physical contact is technically assault) the opening of a door to protest the incident (opening a door isn't assault) is second. Do think the photographer was way too close and has milked his work related injury subsequently but don't blame them for bringing it to Corbyn's attention. Both sides still learning how the other works. they were a lot further back the next day
 
Yes I was about to complain about the misleading use of the word assault in that headline. Also, the fact they opened his car door and complained was reported in the initial stories about the incident.
 
the shove of the photographer occurs first (physical contact is technically assault) the opening of a door to protest the incident (opening a door isn't assault) is second. Do think the photographer was way too close and has milked his work related injury subsequently but don't blame them for bringing it to Corbyn's attention. Both sides still learning how the other works. they were a lot further back the next day

They always get right up close and in peoples faces so yeah, its not unusual to see it escalate quickly
 
Perhaps a uk media organisation will now hire that scum Hungarian camerawoman who tripped migrants, to cover Corbyn.
 
She's pretty harsh, but not exactly from a Tory/Blairite direction ...

That article is nonsensical. For a start:

This old left can’t deal with the new questions posed by Europe, still less with the ongoing question of an English parliament.

... would almost make you think that Corbyn was the one who had been going around the leadership hustings with the "We will be part of the EU, irrespective of what it does, or what Cameron manages to achieve, or what happens in the world" statement.

If you want to mobilise, for instance, Facebook has a bigger reach than Twitter. If you want to get to young women, then it is Instagram. If you want to know the most shared sites on most social media, I am sorry to disappoint but they remain the content generators: Mail Online, Buzzfeed and the Guardian.

... whose Labour leadership campaign was it that was wildly successful online again?

I note the thoughtful theorist Jeremy Gilbert wants to reclaim the media by forcing “all media providers over a certain size to become self-governing trusts within three years”. Wow. If this is serious, it is pushing in the opposite direction to what most people say they want. Less state interference. Over and over, what “ordinary people” like and choose to do and buy is somehow despicable to parts of the left.

Really? "Ordinary people" have been demanding less state interference in the media?
 
agricola : That last one was utterly illogical, I know. Not so much that 'ordinary people' have demanded anything like that, but that the Trusts idea is somehow State Oppressionist in some way. Utter nonsense.

I don't quote these things as if I agree with every last comma, or even much of them at all.


They're just worth a scan is all .... and bits of them may just raise one or two half-way interesting points. To have a pop at far more often than not.
 
agricola : That last one was utterly illogical, I know. Not so much that 'ordinary people' have demanded anything like that, but that the Trusts idea is somehow State Oppressionist in some way. Utter nonsense.

I don't quote these things as if I agree with every last comma, or even much of them at all.


They're just worth a scan is all .... and bits of them may just raise one or two half-way interesting points. To have a pop at far more often than not.

I know, and apologies if it came across as if I was having a go at you - its just that Moore article is maddening, even when viewed against the rest of the anti-Corbyn pieces that have infested that paper lately.
 
The orthodoxy has failed: Europe needs a new economic settlement

Some see EU as an exclusive club not a democratic forum for social progress, writes Jeremy Corbyn

David Cameron is traversing Europe, apparently without much idea of what he wants to achieve in his much-feted renegotiation ahead of a referendum in 2016 or 2017. If the prime minister thinks he can weaken workers’ rights and expect goodwill towards Europe to keep us in the EU, he is making a great mistake.

Mr Cameron’s support for a bill that would weaken the trade unions, and the cutting of tax credits this week, show that employment rights are under attack. One can imagine that the many rights we derive from European legislation, which underpins paid holidays, working time protection and improved maternity and paternity leave, are under threat too.

There is a widely shared feeling that Europe is something of an exclusive club, rather than a democratic forum for social progress. Tearing up our rights at work would strengthen that view. Labour will oppose any attempt by the Conservative government to undermine rights at work — whether in domestic or European legislation.

Our shadow cabinet is also clear that the answer to any damaging changes that Mr Cameron brings back from his renegotiation is not to leave the EU but to pledge to reverse those changes with a Labour government elected in 2020.

Workplace protections are vital to protect both migrant workers from being exploited and British workers from being undercut. Stronger employment rights also help good employers, who would otherwise face unfair competition from less scrupulous businesses. We will be in Europe to negotiate better protection for people and businesses, not to negotiate them away.

Too much of the referendum debate has been monopolised by xenophobes and the interests of corporate boardrooms. Left out of this debate are millions of ordinary British people who want a proper debate about our relationship with the EU. We cannot continue down this road of free-market deregulation, which seeks to privatise public services and dilute Europe’s social gains. Draft railway regulations that are now before the European Parliament could enforce the fragmented, privatised model that has so failed railways in the UK.

The proposed Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership that is being negotiated behind closed doors between the EU and the US, against which I have campaigned, is another example of this damaging approach. There is no future for Europe if we engage in a race to the bottom. We need to invest in our future and harness the skills of Europe’s people.

The treatment of Greece has appalled many who consider themselves pro-European internationalists. The Greek debt is simply not repayable, the terms are unsustainable and the insistence that the unpayable be paid extends the humanitarian crisis in Greece and the risks to all of Europe. The current orthodoxy has failed. We need a new economic settlement.
We should be grateful to Gordon Brown who as chancellor kept the UK out of the single currency, when other cabinet members were arguing that we should join. From our position outside the eurozone, we can and must influence EU economic reform. We must work with the 11 EU nations that are co-operating to bring in a financial transactions tax. Unlike the current chancellor, who wasted taxpayers’ money in a failed legal case to block the tax, we would participate in negotiations to discuss how we can better regulate the financial sector and raise revenues.

Labour is clear that we should remain in the EU. But we too want to see reform. Last week farmers from across the continent protested in Brussels. The common agricultural policy needs reform so that it does less to subsidise landowners and more to help farmers and rural economies. Europe is the only forum in which we can address key challenges for our country, like climate change, terrorism, tax havens and, most recently, the mass movement of refugees from the violence in Syria seeking sanctuary and hope in Europe. We will not win friends and influence in Europe if we refuse to pull our weight.

Labour wants to see change in Europe that delivers for Europe’s people. We want to be better partners, and put our demands to make Europe better. We will make the case through Labour MEPs in the European Parliament, and our relationships with sister social democratic parties, trade unions and other social movements across Europe.

If Mr Cameron fails to deliver a good package or one that reduces the social gains we have previously won in Europe, he needs to understand that Labour will renegotiate to restore our rights and promote a socially progressive Europe.

The writer is the leader of the British Labour Party


Get the fuck in.

Gimped in under a week.


The tories getting the social chapter out of our treaty obligations isn't the same as getting them off the UK statue book. A different battle. What the tories would getting rid of is a safety catch. Similar safety catches, that stop chancers getting elected on the back of promising to build houses with money they haven't got, or limiting EUropean enterprise's ability to own railways, energy and water companies will still exist. Mr Corbyn's Labour party will campaign for keeping them.


Depressing that all our political leaders are selling us down a route to be Federal EUrope's Puerto Rico, except Farage:rolleyes::mad:. Non EUro members have little to offer in sorting out the economic headaches of the EU, in the same way non Schengen do on migration. Being in the Single Market without being the EU has a limited impact on jobs and the evironmenatal asspects could be done through an existing parallel UN route.
 
Corbyn writing for the FT - I've stolen this from another site and not got a sub myself so if its wrong lmk

Get the fuck in.
also todays FT says Corbyn will campaign to stay in the EU as a way of imposing the Tobin Tax (which most EUs countries have alrady signed up for IIRC, but Cameron has refused)

meanwhile in the mail...

_85612147_mail18.jpg

Reds in the bed: Jeremy, Diane and a naked romp in a Cotswolds field... and Labour leader even took his lover on a romantic road trip to East Germany
  • Political soulmates Jeremy Corbyn & Diane Abbott became lovers in 1979
  • Happened even though Corbyn was married to academic Jane Chapman
  • Story of Corbyn’s tryst also shed new light on a 1985 interview Abbott gave
  • She said ‘finest half-hour’ was romping with naked man in a Cotswold field
 
also todays FT says Corbyn will campaign to stay in the EU as a way of imposing the Tobin Tax (which most EUs countries have alrady signed up for IIRC, but Cameron has refused)

meanwhile in the mail...


Reds in the bed: Jeremy, Diane and a naked romp in a Cotswolds field... and Labour leader even took his lover on a romantic road trip to East Germany
  • Political soulmates Jeremy Corbyn & Diane Abbott became lovers in 1979
  • Happened even though Corbyn was married to academic Jane Chapman
  • Story of Corbyn’s tryst also shed new light on a 1985 interview Abbott gave
  • She said ‘finest half-hour’ was romping with naked man in a Cotswold field

I'd be chuffed if I were Corbyn, 'finest half-hour' - nothing like a morning ego boost.
 
_85612147_mail18.jpg

Reds in the bed: Jeremy, Diane and a naked romp in a Cotswolds field... and Labour leader even took his lover on a romantic road trip to East Germany
  • Political soulmates Jeremy Corbyn & Diane Abbott became lovers in 1979
  • Happened even though Corbyn was married to academic Jane Chapman
  • Story of Corbyn’s tryst also shed new light on a 1985 interview Abbott gave
  • She said ‘finest half-hour’ was romping with naked man in a Cotswold field

Best bit:

They became lovers at his London home, apparently after talking socialist doctrine over cups of tea and tins of cold baked beans.

Phwoar!

You couldn't make it up!






Er, wait...
 
Back
Top Bottom