not-bono-ever
meh
Rod liddle is pleased that there is now final proof that there is no race bias. He also calls fora day of rage at teaching unions.
Whilst I'm tempted to dismiss the report out of hand because I am aware of the background of some of the contributors, I'm going to read it first. However, if the conclusion is that
"disparities are more about class than about race" then I'm not too hopeful about the Tories tackling the issue of class disparity.
scrapping use of the BAME terminology was already government policy long before this report.Can any positives be taken from it? I think it has a point on scrapping BAME. Not very useful anymore (if it ever was)
Much better that it has its own thread imo.Thanks. I knew there must be comment somewhere. Too big a story to get missed but was not sure where it was being discussed.
Still it has its own thread now which is good because I can't see it being a one day wonder.
They should have published it tomorrow so that everyone would think it was an April fool.
Sounds like a cruise ship Jimi Hendrix tribute band.'Caribbean Experience' WTF
One of the experts in that article is an occasional poster here and a long term Brixtonite. They’re fuming on Facebook!Have we had this?
Experts named in government’s ‘flawed’ race report ‘shocked’ to see names in evidence contributor list
Exclusive: ‘I was never consulted, I don’t know what record they have of contacting me’www.independent.co.uk
oh look they've pretended to consult experts
Is that S I Martin or are there more than two?One of the experts in that article is an occasional poster here and a long term Brixtonite. They’re fuming on Facebook!
Can’t answer that without breaking rulesIs that S I Martin or are there more than two?
Fair enough but he is another who has outed himself for not being involved.Can’t answer that without breaking rules
CUNT.
This headline doesn't seem altogether accurate
Experts cited in No 10's race report claim they were not properly consulted
Academics say they were not asked to produce research specifically for commission on racial disparitieswww.theguardian.com
'not consulted at all' would be more accurate from the two examples I've seen.
Historian Stephen Bourne said he was horrified to see his name listed. He said he was contacted by an adviser in No 10 to attend a roundtable discussion with other historians of black British history.
“So I turned up and was sort of disappointed to find I was the only historian there, apart from another guy from Cambridge University,” he said. “On a big screen these black and Asian faces suddenly appeared including Tony Sewell, but apart from him I didn’t really recognise anyone else. I didn’t know who they were honestly. I was asked to give my presentation and I said, ‘What presentation? I wasn’t asked to give the presentation.’”
Bourne said he ended up speaking for 10 minutes on the difficulties in raising the profile of his work. “I think they were as baffled as I was as to why I was there. I didn’t know who they were so I wrote down their names and when I came home I Googled them and then the penny dropped they were all part of this government commission and I was so angry and upset.”
He said he let his feelings be known to the special adviser who had initially contacted him. “I said in the future, you need to be very clear and concise about when you invite people to these things and what they’re going into. It’s disrespectful and it’s unprofessional.
“I didn’t even know they were writing a report until it was published yesterday and I was sort of watching the media and then I downloaded it and discovered to my horror that I was cited as a stakeholder.”
They might think you got a parrot second hand.I find myself reflexively shouting this when he comes on the telly. I live alone. Guess the neighbours think I must stub my toe a lot.