terratech said:http://raw-rap.com
Is that your website?
terratech said:http://raw-rap.com
Nigel said:A development which I think is extremly dangerous, is tryinng to get long term unemployed (about 6 Months & over) on either incapacity benefit and/or Disability Living Allowance:If you don't want some short term agency work on the minimum wage then you must be mad. People were arguing for this in the early 1990's when I worked at a UBO office, when there were lots of unemployed caused mainly by the de-industrialisation in Britain, to deal with the numbers. This could be used as a way of cutting back DSS to a skeleton to what it is.
Churning people onto IB doesn't really happen anymore (too expensive), and the majority of people it happened to in the '90s have now reached or are reaching pensionable age, which is why (although the govt keeps very quiet about it) the actual total of people receiving IB (rather than the number claiming) has dropped by about 100,000 a year for the last 5 years, IIRC.Nigel said:A development which I think is extremly dangerous, is tryinng to get long term unemployed (about 6 Months & over) on either incapacity benefit and/or Disability Living Allowance:If you don't want some short term agency work on the minimum wage then you must be mad. People were arguing for this in the early 1990's when I worked at a UBO office, when there were lots of unemployed caused mainly by the de-industrialisation in Britain, to deal with the numbers. This could be used as a way of cutting back DSS to a skeleton to what it is.
SpookyFrank said:Mind you, I wish they'd put me on disability when I'd been on the dole for 6 months, sadly I'm fit as a fiddle (having learned that stealing food out of supermarket bins is a good way to supplement the meagre nutritional intake afforded by £43 dole money a week )
Donna Ferentes said:The last is a silly point as organic food is not generally perceived to be cheap.
Blagsta said:So? They did a lot of good work. Quit the sectarian bullshit eh?
treelover said:Dennis, you and some of the S/P are generally exceptions to the rule,
Blagsta
The majority of the left: a broad and fragile coalition including socialists, progressives, middle class campaigners, unions, anti-war/peace campaigners, anarchists, etc are largely concerned with international issues, Iraq, the environment, etc, poverty, welfare, etc, doesn't get a look in. I can cite the lack of support, in fact (wilful ignorance) for the campaign against the Welfare Reform Act as a concrete example of this neglect.The Coalition Against the Welfare Reform Act organised a protest two years ago at the LP conference in Manchester, despite many activists still being in the city after the anti-war demo protest on the Saturday, the protest held on the Monday saw only a few people of what is broadly called the left attend, (from the SP,) pretty sad, all in all.
dch .. yes .. put the swp involvement is erratic to say the least and depends entirely on other prioritiesBlagsta said:I was at a Hackney Independent showing of a film about DCH in Feb. They seemed to be doing quite a lot as far as I could tell.
durruti02 said:dch .. yes .. put the swp involvement is erratic to say the least and depends entirely on other priorities
durruti02 said:spot on
.. but tree and poster i think we should be clearler about using lefty ( yes yes yes i know i have been lazy many times ion the past .. sorry ) .. we shuold say liberal left or swp or something like that .. sp are a clearly a horse of a differrent colour!
though still not entirely there imho!
was replying to you 24/10 as it happens!Blagsta said:Why are you banging on about the SWP?
durruti02 said:was replying to you 24/10 as it happens!
i believe as do many on here that the SWP are liberal left as opposed to SP being w/c leftBlagsta said:Since when are the SWP "liberal left"? What use of the word "liberal" are you using here?
Blagsta said:Maybe if you follow the entire exchange? All I can see is sectarian bullshit from you and KBJ. I don't care if the SWP are involved in DCH or not. I was just pointing out that "the left" are involved in campaigns around poverty, housing etc.
durruti02 said:i believe as do many on here that the SWP are liberal left as opposed to SP being w/c left
.. wrong thread really but SW are not a w/c org afaiac .. they have leninist managerial politics ( which is NOT liberal) but compared to e.g SP they are liberals e.g. around e.g. community politics/ w/c self defence/immigration/putting demands on the state
durruti02 said:and i was simply pointing out that sw involvement is often dishonest, almost always erractic, and always sub.....ed ( mind gone blank) to their core agenda of building the party .. mate i have seen them trash campaign after campaign .. they are pants
p.s. KJ also gave a very clear reason why he has problems with the SW
Blagsta said:From what I gather, they have quite a solid core of working class and union members.