Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

campaign against welfare cuts and poverty

I once had it from the horses mouth when they `cut me off`(no housing benefit or JSA) for being naughty.

She was the manager of Llandrindod Wells Job Centre in mid Wales. She was flabbergasted that I was being persecuted in this way(unheard of at the time ... about 2004) for educating the unemployed about A4E and there connections with the ongoing Palestinian genocide as well as pointing out the obvious slavery elements of work for your welfare.

When I asked her about the Job Centre staff and what is it exactly that they are employed to do, whilst pointing out that I had seen many people desperate for help given disinformation by staff, she said

"They are employed to prevent people getting benefits they are entitled to"
I got threatened with sanctions on the Work Programme years back. Wouldn't give them a copy of my CV (offered to show it to them). Was told they had to have it to ring employers and aply for jobs on my behalf. Their head office later told me that's not their policy. Just bullshit all round; they wanted it to score some hits and have the adviser make a name for himself, the cunt.
 
Welfare spending for UK's poorest shrinks by £37bn
Figures compiled after decade of austerity and obtained by Frank Field show most striking cuts are in disability benefits

Patrick Butler Social policy editor


Field said the cuts were behind increases in food bank use and destitution. Photograph: Leon Neal/Getty Images
Spending on welfare benefits for the UK’s poorest families will have shrunk by nearly a quarter after a decade of austerity, according to new figures highlighting the plunge in living standards experienced by the worst-off.

By 2021, £37bn less will be spent on working-age social security compared with 2010, despite rising prices and living costs, according to estimates produced by the House of Commons library.

Welfare spending for UK's poorest shrinks by £37bn
 
Welfare spending for UK's poorest shrinks by £37bn
Figures compiled after decade of austerity and obtained by Frank Field show most striking cuts are in disability benefits

Patrick Butler Social policy editor


Field said the cuts were behind increases in food bank use and destitution. Photograph: Leon Neal/Getty Images
Spending on welfare benefits for the UK’s poorest families will have shrunk by nearly a quarter after a decade of austerity, according to new figures highlighting the plunge in living standards experienced by the worst-off.

By 2021, £37bn less will be spent on working-age social security compared with 2010, despite rising prices and living costs, according to estimates produced by the House of Commons library.

Welfare spending for UK's poorest shrinks by £37bn
Scumbags. Because they pretend that nothing has changed.
 
Greenwood says Labour would scrap Tories' benefits sanctions regime
Margaret Greenwood, the shadow work and pensions secretary, told the Labour conference in her speech this afternoon that Labour would scrap the Tories’s benefits sanctions regime (the set of rules that lead to claimants losing benefits if they fail to comply with conditions, such as attending interviews or looking for work). She told delegates:

We know that the majority of people want to work. But we know too that the sanctions regime is failing.

That is why the next Labour government will scrap the Tories’ punitive sanctions regime in its entirety.

We will rebuild our social security system from the principles on which it was founded. Supporting people rather than policing them and alleviating poverty rather than exacerbating it.

She also said Labour would halt the roll out of universal credit to allow its “many flaws” be fixed.

Guardian Politics lIve
 
What the actual fuck?

Tory conference: Charity’s silence on universal credit deaths, hours after minister announces £51m funding

...A DWP spokeswoman confirmed today (Thursday) that the funding of £39 million was for just one year, “with a review at the end”.

But she also appeared to confirm that the contracts signed by the charities includes a clause preventing them from attracting “adverse publicity” to the department or to McVey herself, as in contracts signed by some of the disability charities who have signed up to deliver services as part of DWP’s new Work and Health Programme.

Such a clause is likely to say that Citizens Advice must “pay the utmost regard to the standing and reputation” of McVey and must promise not to do anything that harms the public’s confidence in her or DWP.

Asked whether the contracts do include such a clause, a DWP spokeswoman said this afternoon: “Such paragraphs are typical in DWP grants....
 
And, just to be perfectly clear about it, the charity is "Citizens Advice".

I would have hoped they'd have had more of a sense of moral purpose. I'm going to feel a lot less comfortable about advising clients to get advice from them about their dealings with DWP now - and can't help thinking that £51m was a pretty cheap price to pull the teeth of an organisation better placed than most to rip DWP a new one.
 
Last edited:
Anyway, good strategic move, Labour can say how is austerity ending when people are losing so much on U/C?, Labour can and will end austerity, he can say.
 
what on earth is wrong with that, grow up, plenty of posters postulate political strategy on this site, some more than others, i stick to what i know about.
 
the best idea would be to get rid of working tax credits - in this way the working poor will be independent and the State will be able to stop subsidising low paying employers
 
Corbyn - he'll just let in millions more immigrants to lower wages and destroy any chance of people having somewhere to live - where's he going to house all these folk or pay for it?
 
Back
Top Bottom