Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

campaign against welfare cuts and poverty

Housing benefit claimants 'up 60%'
2:40am Friday 9th May 2014 in National News © Press Association 2014

3016268.jpg

Figures suggest 386,000 more people with jobs are receiving housing benefit now than in 2010

The number of working people claiming housing benefit has risen by almost 60% since 2010, according to research commissioned by Labour.

Figures compiled by the House of Commons Library for the party suggest 386,000 more people with jobs are receiving the subsidy, up to 1,036,813 in November 2013 from 650,551 in May 2010.

Shadow work and pensions secretary Rachel Reeves said the increase was set to cost the public purse an extra £4.8 billion over this Parliament.

"These shocking figures expose the complete failure of David Cameron's Government to control housing benefit spending because more people are struggling to pay their rent.

http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/news/national/news/11201843.Housing_benefit_claimants__up_60__/
 
David Blanchflower

Sunday 11 May 2014

Unemployment will scar us for years

The figures make it look as if unemployment is going down, but they hide a multitude of sins and as usual it is the poorest that suffer the most


web-unemployment-rex.jpg

Unemployment still matters. Fortunately the unemployment rate has been trending down in the UK, from 7.9 per cent in May 2010, to a high of 8.4 per cent at the end of 2011, to the latest estimate of 6.9 per cent. The number of unemployed has fallen by 414,000 over this period.

But those positive moves hides a multitude of sins. First, the unemployment rate of those under 18 is 21.7 per cent and 17.2 per cent for those ages 18-24. There are still 881,000 unemployed youngsters under the age of 25, of whom 600,000 are not in full-time education. Second, the unemployment rate of Pakistanis is 17 per cent; 18.6 per cent for Bangladeshis; and 15.9 per cent for Black/African/Caribbeans. Third, long-term unemployment has risen. In the latest data, 807,000 had been unemployed for at least a year, of whom 244,000 were under 25. Fourth, the groups that experience high levels of unemployment are hit by a double whammy; even when they get jobs they are often underemployed, many being forced into part-time and temporary jobs when they want full-time.
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/unemployment-will-scar-us-for-years-9350816.html
 
I heard goings-on in the kitchen area-it transpired -after a very heavy Post Mittelwoch Session-I dared to venture to the area-and discovered my Very Significant Other-doing the dishes-I blantantly stuttered "Oh-Women -Work-then- Hun"-The riposte was" At least I have a job"
 
What can be done? The Tories just flat out deny it and the rest of the media has the unemployed cat as scroungers so as to smear any such claims, or otherwise justify treatment thereof because they are scroungers.

McVile is on Qt tonight. Normally, desperate being a farce, I do watch. In shall make an exception.

The Express'headline yesterday wax just as vile. It never seems to end. There's no guarantee we can get this government out so this terror will continue. I fear militant action, from within or without,will be the only way.
 
This whistleblower chap has handed all the evidence he's collected over to Smith and McVey which seems like the best possible way to ensure it all gets shredded immediately.

And there have been more or less identical revelations before. The worst that will happen is that the DWP claim that this is an ioslated fuck up at one jobcentre and then bury the whole thing. PCS need to grow some balls on this one, their staff are being required to do unethical and quite possibly illegal things as a matter of course.
 
There is no fucking way the tories will believe what he says or do anything. I'm sure they pretended to listen, but it's all going to be treated as hearsay and anecdote and thus ignored.

The PCS really really needs to get it's arse into gear. This affects their staff as well as their 'customers'.

Or of course it's all Labour's fault, no money left, scroungers, hardworking families, liam byrne's note, welfarism, paying down our debts, etc.
 
The act that took the most planning
"That has to be the Atos questionnaire. We wanted to assess the assessors, to see if they were up to the job. We worked with [disability activists] WOWpetition on this, to find disabled people who had been through the process, to create a form that was easy to read; there was a braille version and Alexei Sayle did the audio version. Then we had professors in Sheffield breaking down the answers academically.
We presented the findings to the parliamentary committee and they have published them on their website, which is a fantastic result, and so now it's covered by partial parliamentary privilege. This is where I disagree with Russell Brand – our parliament is deeply flawed, but the ruling class loves you if you don't vote, so that's the least you can do, and there are parliamentary committees you can get stuck into, you can use the system.
We've got all the data and stats – things like a fifth of Atos buildings didn't have disabled access, 95% of people going for an Atos assessment said the assessor hadn't read any medical records before they started. There's very much an agenda of demonising the poor and the weakest at the moment, and to fight back academically is interesting."


http://www.theguardian.com/stage/2014/may/21/mark-thomas-100-acts-minor-dissent-ukip-farage

Apparently Mark Thomas on his latest tour undertook a project to develop a questionnaire for ATOS assessors, it has been posted on a parliamentary committee website

kudos to him and his team.
 
here's another reminder why it is important to keep up the protests against this crap - saw a woman today who has been sanctioned one month for missing 1 day of a 'find work' programme - she was actually at work that day (she works part time). she is devastated. what a sick way to run things.
 
here's another reminder why it is important to keep up the protests against this crap - saw a woman today who has been sanctioned one month for missing 1 day of a 'find work' programme - she was actually at work that day (she works part time). she is devastated. what a sick way to run things.
Has she appealed. Given the success rate of such appeals, certinly under these circumstances (which is basically an awful foreshadowing of the Universal Credit scheme), she would win I think.
 
Has she appealed. Given the success rate of such appeals, certinly under these circumstances (which is basically an awful foreshadowing of the Universal Credit scheme), she would win I think.

i think she has and yes, she would probably win it. But what a stressful experience to have to go through for something that should really be so simple.
 
Indeed. She shouldn't have to go through any of this. Noone should. But that case represents exactly what I fear people on UC will face: being required to compromise their job or lose their pittance.
 
If this isn't irony, I'm a canadian singer songwriter!



:eek:

And the clock struck thirteen.

Nah, it's a rather simple manifestation of projecting blame. It is indeed "ineptitude and ideology" that have driven coverage. Unfortunately for Caseby, those factors are situated firmly in his dept, not in the way the media have covered the story.
 
PIP is in a mess. We all know it and only the DWP try to deny it.
But the surest signs that panic is beginning to set in is the fact that Capita have now more than doubled the pay they are offering to assessors in their attempt to get on top of the backlog. Capita health professionals now have a ‘new incentive scheme’ which means they can earn up to £900 a day. Not bad for physiotherapists more accustomed to earning £40 an hour.
In addition, the DWP have rewritten their guidance to assessors in the hope of persuading them to carry out fewer face-to-face medicals and assess more people just on paper evidence, backed up by a telephone call to the claimant to get additional information where necessary. Currently 98% of PIP assessments are face-to-face, but the DWP is aiming for this figure to drop to around 75%. This means a big increase in the number of PIP claimants who will be getting a call out of the blue from an Atos or Capita health professional.
We’ll be updating our guide to claiming PIP with more information about how decisions will be made about who gets a face-to-face medical and also with suggestions about how to deal with a phone call from a PIP health professional, by the end of the week.
In some cases the changes will mean claimants with substantial impairments getting an award of PIP without having to attend a medical, which can only be a good thing.
But in other cases the guidance makes it clear that assessors can refuse to make any award of PIP based simply on the claim pack completed by the claimant, with telephone clarification of specific issues if required.
It makes it even more vital that PIP ‘How your disability affects you’ forms are completed in as much detail as possible and that you get medical evidence if you can.
Unfortunately, Citizens Advice have discovered that half of all GP surgeries are now charging for evidence for ESA appeals and there’s no reason to suppose that things are any different when it comes to PIP.

latest from benefits and work newsletter, assessors can now make 900 pounds a day, ffs, and G'P are charging for ESA appeals, the new Lords Of Poverty!
 
latest from benefits and work newsletter, assessors can now make 900 pounds a day, ffs, and G'P are charging for ESA appeals, the new Lords Of Poverty!
TBF, GPs are reporting absolutely massive levels of demand for documentation and reports for ESA type appeals, and most doctors aren't quite the rich git fat cats we tend to assume they are: many practices are small businesses, not just doctors raking in a big salary, and the time and admin necessary to do these appeals - and which isn't part of their normal contracted NHS work, so what they're paid doesn't account for it - is pretty huge.

Many doctors do try to do what they can, but there's a limit to what they CAN do, and the BMA has been banging on for ages about the way the DWP are doing things and the effect it's having on both their patients, and general practice.

No, the blame for this lies, as ever, right back at the door of the venal and unprincipled DWP.
 
IDS vs The Big Issue.

Iain Duncan Smith has criticised the Big Issue magazine saying that it provides a way for immigrants from eastern Europe to claim benefits in Britain.

Mr Duncan Smith said the magazine was being used "more and more" as a foothold for Romanians and other Europeans to access tax credits.
 
http://refuted.org.uk/2014/06/07/jobsearchpilot/

Dystopian 35 Hours a Week Supervised Jobsearch for Jobseeker’s Allowance Pilot
Posted on 07/06/2014 by www.refuted.org.uk
The Supervised Jobsearch Pilot Scheme

3. (1) The Supervised Jobsearch Pilot Scheme is prescribed for the purposes of section 17A(1) (schemes for assisting persons to obtain employment: “work for your benefit” schemes etc) of the Jobseekers Act 1995.

(2) The Supervised Jobsearch Pilot Scheme (“the Scheme”) is a scheme—

(a) that is designed to provide support and assistance to a claimant in their search to find employment, in a supervised environment, for up to 35 hours per week over a period of up to 13 weeks; and

(b) which involves an initial interview with the Scheme provider to discuss what the claimant is required to do by way of participation in the Scheme and may also involve training or other activity to help improve a claimant’s job search skills, help preparing for job interviews and assistance with job applications and preparing a curriculum vitae.http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2014/9780111115367

Pilot to operate until 30th April 2015 within:

a) East Anglia; – (b) Black Country; – (c) Mercia;- (d) Surrey & Sussex; – (e) West Yorkshire.
 
Unending workfare.

6. (1) The Secretary of State may select a claimant (“C”) on a sampling basis for participation in the Scheme if the following conditions are met.

(2) The first condition is that C has reached the age of 18.

(3) The second condition is that C is registered at a Jobcentre Plus office within a Jobcentre Plus district of the Department for Work and Pensions, by whatever name it is from time to time known, which is identified by reference to its name at the date these Regulations come into force as listed below—

(a)East Anglia;

(b)Black Country;

(c)Mercia;

(d)Surrey & Sussex;

(e)West Yorkshire.

(4) The third condition is that C is required to meet the jobseeking conditions(14).

(5) The fourth condition is that C is not under a current requirement to participate in the Work Programme under regulation 5 of the Jobseeker’s Allowance (Schemes for Assisting Persons to Obtain Employment) Regulations 2013(15).

So over 18 and not on the work programme - they'll say this is for long term unemployed but it could apply from day 1 until referral to WP.
 
I'm surprised it doesn't - presumably because that will clash with WP contracts.

Really this is just the privatisation of welfare. The WP is a dismal failure so they reward it by basically giving the same bunch of people (same people running hese new schemes as run the WP locally - Jobfit, depending on who they subcontract to) more contracts to further line their pockets. Surely at this point IDS has overreached himself. How are these companies going to manage 35 hour a week supervised jobsearches as well as finding workfare placem,ents with a community service remit?
 
I'm surprised it doesn't - presumably because that will clash with WP contracts.

Really this is just the privatisation of welfare. The WP is a dismal failure so they reward it by basically giving the same bunch of people (same people running hese new schemes as run the WP locally - Jobfit, depending on who they subcontract to) more contracts to further line their pockets. Surely at this point IDS has overreached himself. How are these companies going to manage 35 hour a week supervised jobsearches as well as finding workfare placem,ents with a community service remit?

British-Pounds.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom