Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

campaign against welfare cuts and poverty

SR13 is the breakdown of what DWP hopes to achieve in savings etc. when the changes in the Spending Review of 2013 are implemented.
An example from the document - "By 2015, we are expecting around 560,000 DLA re-assessments to have taken place, with around 170,000 claimants (30 per cent) expected to lose entitlement to benefit".
That's a direct quote from this -
www.parliament.uk/documents.commons-committees/work-and-pensions or just google sr13dwp




Next big and cruel thing is SR13, its the bureaucratic callousness of it all, I don't usually say this but it becomes clearer how the final solution became possible.

Though, of course, they are so useless, that most of the above has been postponed to 2017.
 
Pissed off with the Spartacus report too. It's actually advocating MORE assessments for ill and disabled claiming ESA so people can be further assessed for what they CAN do enabling MORE info sent to JC+ Disability advisers about their abilities and disabilities so they can be crammed into imaginary work somewhere once employers take on board their needs and make adaptations and changes for them.

Yeah that's gonna work. More stress, costs and profits for poverty pimps.
 
Fucking sick of sue march being the supposed face of disability campaigning. her Passive/agressive pushing of this report all over the place was boakworthy.
 
Yes, as a senior party member, she seems to be following a New Labour line, I used to think she was fantastic and she is a great campaigner, but have my doubts about her direction now

Oh, and another thing, these latest cruel and petty measures were certainly signed off by Clegg who recently said "we must sharpen the incentives to work"
 
Next, Osborne is to send his pie chart detailing government expenditure to millions of people, it has a a massive category labelled simply "welfare" which is not broken down into what he is actually spending in the various categories such as pensions which take up the bulk of spending, disgustingly it will also include social care* and of course taxpayers will be paying for this little missive.


*reminding one of "the citizen, this imbecile will cost you 30'000 Reich's Marks" of the 1930's
 
Last edited:
No, I don't think so. There's an obvious serious connection to the Labour party there and her rhetoric takes that into consideration all the time. The latest sparty report, as I said, is calling for more WCA type assessments to get people with serious illnesses and disabilities off benefits and into work when the call should be to scrap the damned thing completely.

She has been using passive/agressive posts on social media to get people behind it and saying it's been well received everywhere when it hasn't. Well perhaps by those who follow her unthinkingly and politicals who can use it to continue ESA claimant bashing.

I honestly thought when Sparty started talking to other groups like Black Triangle and DPAC that it would make a difference to the academic based think tank that Spartacus seems to have become.

Sue is just the face of that because of her following and possible influence in the Labour party.

We don't take any other politics or think tank type reports and people at face value so why should we blindly follow Sue and accept all she is and stands for.

We are not spoons.
 
The report suggests that a 'caseworker' meet with the prospective claimant several times, gathering evidence, before submitting this for a final decision, possibly in the claimant's home.

Is this what you mean?

I share your concerns about proximity to the labour party, same with Jack Monroe.
 
The report suggests that a 'caseworker' meet with the prospective claimant several times, gathering evidence, before submitting this for a final decision, possibly in the claimant's home.

Is this what you mean?

I share your concerns about proximity to the labour party, same with Jack Monroe.


Ah, that is very revealing, this is exactly what is happening with social care in many areas of the U.K:, when you apply for a care assessment now you start off with a process called 'reablement' where someone from a private agency spends at least six weeks intensive in your home, teaching a client how to cook, manage day to living, even washing and toileting, its basically Orwellian screening and to get surveillance into the home and only 20% of applicants are finally getting an assessment, It is really cynical stuff, imo. Labour councils are particularly fond of it as it looks like they are doing something when basically they are making cuts.

not many even very disabled people would pass a process where you are observed for six weeks in the home.Certainly, those with MH problems who exhibited even the desire for a bit of life, playing music, ringing friends, etc would be in difficulty.

Frankie, which sites are there where you can express concern with the report?
 
Last edited:
The report suggests that a 'caseworker' meet with the prospective claimant several times, gathering evidence, before submitting this for a final decision, possibly in the claimant's home.

Is this what you mean?

I share your concerns about proximity to the labour party, same with Jack Monroe.


Yep. Further stress and hassle when really not needed. All to crowbar people into imaginary jobs.
 
TBH between Indyref, WRA, new DWP legislation etc. and trying to help and inform people on many aspects of all of these I'm feeling a tad thinly spread at the moment. I feel a 'pissed' on the horizon.. soon.. ;)
 
I don't agree that purpose of 'welfare' is to engineer people into work. It should be about meeting people's basic needs so they can transcend a life of stress, one day at a time, hand to mouth, living where everything is worry and hassle. Then they can plan for the future and society can help them utilise their skills and abilities for something worthwhile. Not hawking cheap slap for a few hours here and there while trying to feed 5 kids.
 
God that program wound me up from start to finish. More than any of those ridiculous 'debates' that have been on in the past few months. It wound me up because it's seeing people at the sharp end of these policies, getting stamped on repeatedly by this fucking snivelling rotten shower of cunts in government. I also felt quite scared because I'm a whisker away from being in a similar situation and there's not a thing I can do about it except find a job but unfortunately there's no job fairy.
 
Blimey, an empathetic balanced programme on benefits on the BBC(who basically began the smearing with Britain On The Sick' Panorama a few years ago), well I never

Condem's will be livid,
I don't know about that. At the end the woman with five kids got a council house in Brent and a job as a nursery worker, and the family who were sent to High Wycombe were returned to London after a review, so they'll say the reforms are working.
 
It's just bullying.

IDS gets paid a fortune in a party of people who get paid a fortune in a place that costs a fortune and the best he can muster is to push people into absolute dire straits and then have a go at them for not taking a miserable job selling cosmetics. Tha'ts money that could be used to give them a citizens income or at the very least invest in building them a future. Since that lady with 5 kids ended up working in a nursery; why wasn't that the plan at the DWP from the start; assuming that was something she wanted to do (don't know, didn't say), it seems an obvious fit for a mother and a job that helps the community.

Instead it's just the rich bullying the poor and the desperate.

Fuck you Smith, I hope you fucking burn.
 
We really need someone to do a study on how much self-employment has brought down the unemployment figures, several figures have hinted at the extent of the problem.
And learn whether any of these people are going to fall foul of having to repay their tax credits because their 'business' didn't earn enough.
 
I thought I was pretty well versed on social policy but the bit where that woman said 'so Brent council can't afford to pay my rent now but if I'm working they'll pay it all except £4 I have to find myself?' or words to that effect just took my breath away at the stupidity of it. As you say, AW it's just bullying. This isn't about saving money, it's not about support it's about forcing people into meaningless, soul destroying employment to make some other cunt richer than they already are. Avon! FFS! Avon! When you have 5 kids? It's beyond absurd! Help people into work by all means but make sure there's jobs better than going door to door begging people to slather themselves in cosmetic slop for a nominal fee.

Fucking hell I'm beyond fucking angry at this! Fuck the tories, fuck their spineless power hungry rent boys on their knees deep throating their master's spotty, wrinkly 0.5 inch dicks, fuck the pathetic weasel labour party, fuck all the other shitty parties, especially that sack of cheesy bellends that Farage is and fuck the proddy cunting work ethic! GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!! :mad::mad::mad:
 
And learn whether any of these people are going to fall foul of having to repay their tax credits because their 'business' didn't earn enough.

If it's as big of a problem as it seems and the system is being abused this way then surely we are going to see huge problems.
 
Back
Top Bottom