Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Bye bye MEAT! How will the post-meat future look?

How reluctant are you to give up your meat habit?


  • Total voters
    196
Status
Not open for further replies.
That's sad. Genuinely. :(

Wasn't the case with my old cat, fortunately for him. He was already in pain from illness/old age, but there was no fear in his face when he died. He didn't know he was dying at that point, of course.
 
I'm not sure about the consumptability of the post life flesh. But I believe it is far more humane to kill animals in the manner prescribed by veterinary science
As for cost: you've struck gold here, shipmate! The most humane methods for killing will certainly drive up the cost of meat.
Thus, consumption of it will decrease.
Eat less meat!
Barbiturates cost pennies. Probably far less than the cost of a bolt. :facepalm:
 
Barbiturates cost pennies. Probably far less than the cost of a bolt. :facepalm:
Great. Then this method of killing animals is to commence immediately in all US and UK slaughterhouses? Excellent! Again a consensus has been reached through our putting our heads together and making reasonvble compromises.
 
Great. Then this method of killing animals is to commence immediately in all US and UK slaughterhouses? Excellent! Again a consensus has been reached through our putting our heads together and making reasonvble compromises.
So you're in favour of killing animals for no reason then as the meat would be inedible. :facepalm: :(
 
Her statement. About her dog, what it was like, what she did to it, and that. You know. The statement she put out.

She didn't put out a statement, the controversy surrounds a book excerpt, I'm not sure what aspect of what she said you're objecting to. But regardless, are you saying that the shooting the puppy in the head thing itself was okay, just that the stuff that went before it was wrong?
 
At least it would optimise consumer incentive structures to make the morally right and sustainable choice. :thumbs:
 
Is it edible? If not, can it be made edible?
No.
Here is the POM-V sheet for Pentobarbital for Euthanasia 20% w/v Solution for Injection: https://www.vmd.defra.gov.uk/productinformationdatabase/files/QRD_Documents/QRD-Auth_1243983.PDF

Highlights include: "Not to be used in animals intended for human or animal consumption. Treated horse may never be slaughtered for human consumption. The horses must have been declared as not for human consumption under national horse passport legislation."
"User Warnings: This is a potent drug, which is toxic to man. Particular care shouldbe taken to avoid accidental ingestion and self-injection. Pentobarbital is a potent hypnotic and sedative (Sch 3 CD). It is toxic if swallowed and can be absorbed through the skin."

Also, lethal injection isn't always effective. Animals can take quite a long time to die and occasionally need more of it to finish them off. I did my work experience at a vets, and therefore saw a lot of animals die like that as it is the bread and butter of what vets do. I dislike it immensely as a method of euthanasia and yet slaughterhouses don't bother me. Make of that what you will.
 
Big fuck-off dose of heroin would be one way to do. Would be my choice, I think. Heroin is cheap as well. But can't be used cos reasons. (No idea about the edibility of a heroin-riddled body.)
 
This thread is surreal now.

Some non-sequitur about a dog and using barbituates as a slaughter method.

I'm pretty sure I posted up the AHDB video explaining sheep slaughter but, to reiterate:
The stun (which should be recoverable, whichever way you do it) renders the animal insensible. It is then killed by a neck cut. You need to bleed a carcase out - how on earth would you achieve this on one killed with an overdose of barbituates (even before you've got into the toxicity of them)?
 
This thread is surreal now.

Some non-sequitur about a dog and using barbituates as a slaughter method.

I'm pretty sure I posted up the AHDB video explaining sheep slaughter but, to reiterate:
The stun (which should be recoverable, whichever way you do it) renders the animal insensible. It is then killed by a neck cut. You need to bleed a carcase out - how on earth would you achieve this on one killed with an overdose of barbituates (even before you've got into the toxicity of them)?
You can prove anything with facts. :rolleyes:
 
Great. Then this method of killing animals is to commence immediately in all US and UK slaughterhouses? Excellent! Again a consensus has been reached through our putting our heads together and making reasonvble compromises.
Like I said — a new low of idiocy
 
Just leave the livestock for half an hour with Jeff and Bcuster and the buggers will be running head first at the nearest wall.

Voluntary euthanasia and they get to spout their claptrap to their hearts content.

Everyone is happy!
 

Just leave the livestock for half an hour with Jeff and Bcuster and the buggers will be running head first at the nearest wall.

Voluntary euthanasia and they get to spout their claptrap to their hearts content.

Everyone is happy!
Well said!
 
This thread is surreal now.

Some non-sequitur about a dog and using barbituates as a slaughter method.

I'm pretty sure I posted up the AHDB video explaining sheep slaughter but, to reiterate:
The stun (which should be recoverable, whichever way you do it) renders the animal insensible. It is then killed by a neck cut. You need to bleed a carcase out - how on earth would you achieve this on one killed with an overdose of barbituates (even before you've got into the toxicity of them)?
Disgusting, repugnant and inhumane.
 
Disgusting, repugnant and inhumane.

Not to most who eat meat it isn't.

Do you find a slow death from poison equally repugnant? Grainstores must have poison stations around them to comply with Red Tractor for example...

I'm sure rodent contaminated grain would be a barrel of laughs if you were to eat it....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom