That is a transcription error: it is actually a warning re consequences of hunting Cetaceans.revelation speaks of the etarnal torments,the wiling and gnashing ofteeth
That is a transcription error: it is actually a warning re consequences of hunting Cetaceans.revelation speaks of the etarnal torments,the wiling and gnashing ofteeth
I'm not. Does that mean I'm not British?
If you're not, neither am I. Fuck it, if Cameron thinks his cronies and his values are what makes this country great, I want it back.I'm not. Does that mean I'm not British?
You said
"You know, this is the sort of thing one might expect from an American Republican politician."
Except it isn't, really. Political Christianity in Britain and the USA is very different..
I don't think people are that bothered about it either way tbh, .
Even the Anglican Church admits that Britons are not exactly known for their regular religious attendance.
So when Prime Minister David Cameron claimed that the UK is a "Christian country" that should be "more evangelical" about its faith, it definitely stood out – and stirred controversy.
Now, Britons have found themselves debating whether they should be "proud" of Christianity, or whether such talk risks sowing "alienation and division" in a more pluralistic society.
A group of scientists, academics and prominent writers accused Prime Minister David Cameron on Monday of stoking sectarian divisions through his repeated description of Britain as a “Christian country”.
The public figures, including authors Philip Pullman and Terry Pratchett, said they respected the Conservative leader’s own religious beliefs, which he has addressed in a series of statements.
But they took issue with his characterisation of Britain saying, in a letter to the Daily Telegraph, the country was actually a “plural society” of largely “non-religious” people.
“To constantly claim otherwise fosters alienation and division in our society,” said the 55 members of the group that also included Nobel prize winning scientist John Sulston.
“It needlessly fuels enervating sectarian debates that are by and large absent from the lives of most British people, who do not want religions or religious identities to be actively prioritised by their elected government,” the letter added.
“It needlessly fuels enervating sectarian debates that are by and large absent from the lives of most British people, who do not want religions or religious identities to be actively prioritised by their elected government,” the letter added.
That is a transcription error: it is actually a warning re consequences of hunting Cetaceans.
It might've been easier if the post I quoted didn't have the typo in "wailing".Tried to do a search to find out what the hell you're on about and found this instead:
Jesus says in Mark 9:45-46 concerning those who are lost, that they will be "cast into hell, into the fire that shall never shall be quenched: where their worm does not die, and the fire is not quenched".
We've got an inner spirit worm. I fucking knew it
Did you have a question?
people kill people and justify it however they please.
You haven't stood in a roomful of Pagans have you? Just three can have a sustained tenway arguement.Religion makes it a shitload easier to get a few hundred thousand other people to join in though.
Have UK-based posters let you down somehow?I do.
I've been looking for a thread on this for a while. Why did it take a Canadian to start it?
I will now go and read the thread. Bet the answer is somewhere in the next page or two.
No they haven't. They really haven't....Now, Britons have found themselves debating whether they should be "proud" of Christianity, or whether such talk risks sowing "alienation and division" in a more pluralistic society....
http://news.yahoo.com/whats-behind-camerons-embrace-christian-britain-205701394.html
No they haven't. They really haven't.
No they haven't. They really haven't.
And he wants British people to be more evangelical, too.
I'd say that a majority of neo-Pagans aren't any more fascist or racist than your average person on the street, and I've met an awful lot of neo-Pagans.
I've also met racist, fascist "blood and soil" types from the Odinic Rite. The majority of them were and are boneheads who are Odinists because they think Christianity is weak, whereas fantasising about carving the Blood Eagle onto a non-white is seemingly strong.
R4's 'Today' programme ran a piece, this am, about this particular example of christian evangelicalism. Is that evangelical enough for you Dave?
Have UK-based posters let you down somehow?
Why didn't you start a thread yourself?
that clip is incredible, in every sense. my word.
I realise it's not the most important point on this thread but you don't have to write quote or unquote when using written communication to express the disbelief or doubt. We have a symbol for that: '...quote unquote pagans...
An Italian man was crushed to death on Thursday by a giant crucifix dedicated to the late Pope John Paul II, just days before the Polish pontiff will be made a saint in a ceremony at the Vatican.
In a bizarre coincidence, the 21-year-old man was reported to have been living in a street named after Pope John XXIII – who will also be canonised in the ceremony on Sunday, in an event that is unprecedented in the 2,000 year history of the Catholic Church.
If he's not canonised he will kill again.fucking hell, JP2 is going to be sainted that quickly after his death?
The Church of England has been denounced
as “evil” and “unholy” as parishes around the
country enforce an archaic law dating to
Henry VIII’s reign telling unwitting residents
they could face bills exceeding £100,000 for
building repairs...
A spokeswoman for the Church of England
said the issue was a matter for “individual
PCCs”.
Holy fuck! Does Dave really want this sort of thing here?