danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
"For verily I say unto thee, thy scrounging days are over".And Jesus sayeth unto the poor cripple...
"Get up and toil. Thou art fit for work."
"For verily I say unto thee, thy scrounging days are over".And Jesus sayeth unto the poor cripple...
"Get up and toil. Thou art fit for work."
ennit, what about Disraeli
No but there's a worrying correlation between the two IME.
Of course some pagans are not fascist or racist in any way. Some of them are just your common-or-garden twats.
I'd be happy with 'cricketing nation', to distinguish us from the non cricket-playing barbarian lands found elsewhere.
tell us more about looking down on people, please.
you don't actually know any religious people do you? or at least, haven't spoken to them about their beliefs? no-one (well, only a tiny minority) actually believes this in practice.More importantly I don't think that those who disagree with me on this point are gonna spend eternity being tortured in the fires of hell.
you don't actually know any religious people do you? or at least, haven't spoken to them about their beliefs? no-one (well, only a tiny minority) actually believes this in practice.
they aren't.
Up to a point Lord Copper. The US constitution is founded on the principle of seperation of church and state. Although many, but not all, who founded this secular state were privately very religous. It says a lot about intellectual shallowness of the Tory swivel eyed loons, like Pickels and Warsi, that they believe the concept of secular disestablishment is 'militant athiesm'. Interesting most of these characters also believe British citizens' right to freedom of religion laid down in the ECHR should be done away with. Magna Carta, did she die in vein?You know, this is the sort of thing one might expect from an American Republican politician.
I think you're falling into the trap that many of us non-believers fall into - the trap of taking religion more seriously than most believers do.Oh right well I guess all those books are just glorified doorstops then. Odd that they make such a fuss about them in that case.
I think you're falling into the trap that many of us non-believers fall into - the trap of taking religion more seriously than most believers do.
Because the founding farthers didnt want a church of america which could ruin the life of anyone who wasnt a member as the c of e did in its less cuddly days
people kill people and justify it however they please.When religion stops getting people killed I'll stop taking it seriously.
Hellfire isn't in the Bible, is it? I thought it was a later church invention.Oh right well I guess all those books are just glorified doorstops then. Odd that they make such a fuss about them in that case.
Nope. To the latter.Hellfire isn't in the Bible, is it? I thought it was a later church invention.
Good old St John, eh?revelation speaks of the etarnal torments,the wiling and gnashing ofteeth
Fair enoughNope. To the latter.
The idea was further developed and refined later on though - made useful if you know what i mean.Fair enough
revelation speaks of the etarnal torments,the wiling and gnashing ofteeth