that's generally not how these hings work. There was probably a grant for it and so they did it - like CCTV schemes in the Blair years. Construction companies who continually lobby politicians for favour tend to do quite well out of it. In fact there's plenty of evidence that speed humps don't really work - they bring their own problems - I'd hate to have one outside my house because of all the extra noise and pollution it would bring. Other traffic calming methods work better. Even as a cyclist I didn't like speed humps because they made motorists drive like idiots.Its not sabotage - speedbumps cost money to install, so I guess they'd only do so when there is a reason for it - such as boy racers, residential areas or near schools.
They’re not ideal, but better than nothing. File under “tough shit” really.that's generally not how these hings work. There was probably a grant for it and so they did it - like CCTV schemes in the Blair years. Construction companies who continually lobby politicians for favour tend to do quite well out of it. In fact there's plenty of evidence that speed humps don't really work - they bring their own problems - I'd hate to have one outside my house because of all the extra noise and pollution it would bring. Other traffic calming methods work better. Even as a cyclist I didn't like speed humps because they made motorists drive like idiots.
i never believe quotes in local papers - they tend to put words in your mouthHe would have a point if it pertained to access for emergency vehicles or busses, etc, but he chose to modify an otherwise sensible car in such a way that it can't cope with modest bumps in the road. More fool him.
Anyway I kind of lost any sympathy for him after this bit:
If he was disabled & driving a modified vehicle that needed to be lower to accommodate a wheelchair or similar, then it would be discrimination. I have very little time for those who throw accusations of discrimination around frivolously, it cheapens the meaning for those who are genuinely victims of discrimination.
i don't actually give a toss about the guy - but i don't feel such strong antipathy against him either - but i do hate speed humps.They’re not ideal, but better than nothing. File under “tough shit” really.
did he though - or was that just the paper who put that in?He would have a point if it pertained to access for emergency vehicles or busses, etc, but he chose to modify an otherwise sensible car in such a way that it can't cope with modest bumps in the road. More fool him.
Anyway I kind of lost any sympathy for him after this bit:
If he was disabled & driving a modified vehicle that needed to be lower to accommodate a wheelchair or similar, then it would be discrimination. I have very little time for those who throw accusations of discrimination around frivolously, it cheapens the meaning for those who are genuinely victims of discrimination.
A 23 year old who spent £3k lowering a £2.5k Passat. He's probably a bit old, but he does fit the stereotype tbfthat story though was so shoddily written. 'Boy racer' was actually commuting builder.
I have no idea. There is as much evidence to say he did as there is to say he didn't.did he though - or was that just the paper who put that in?
It would not surprise me if the story was sensationalised a bit, it's in the Metro after all, not the Times.i don't actually give a toss about the guy - but i don't feel such strong antipathy against him either - but i do hate speed humps.
that story though was so shoddily written. 'Boy racer' was actually commuting builder.
Are you denying his right to identify as a boy racer? Sounds dodgy to me...why is he being described as a boy racer? He's clearly neither a boy, nor a racer, and tbh he does kind of have a point/ unpopular opinion
A speed bump caused caused me to crack my sump.
Are you denying his right to identify as a boy racer? Sounds dodgy to me...
A speed bump caused caused me to crack my sump.
I went over it as I always had, nice and slow because it was a bit high, unfortunately in the week since I'd last been there a pothole had opened up immediately after it. As I crept carefully over the car suddenly dropped into the hole and cracked the sump. 500€ of damage.
All this in a bog standard ride height. Those who slam their cars like this person has must find driving around near impossible for most purposes, shopping, commuting, etc.
I live in Spain where the attitude is one of "shit happens."This is the type of insurance claim that councils are obliged to cover. careful documentation, photos, statements, measurements. I think you've got to have the distance from the top of the hump to the bottom of the pothole (planks with a spirit level and ruler) and you're good.
If you can be bothered.
Yep. Even expensive customised cars are cack.All mods are shit, but a Passat?
Yep. Even expensive customised cars are cack.
There's a massively modded AMG GT S near us that must have cost £150k with just the body mods and fuck knows what he's done to the mechanics. I can't walk past it without thinking "wanker".
It's one thing modding body/style, that's personal taste. Modding mechanical parts is a whole different ball game. Even more mundane manufacturers have much more expertise than most of us.And then there's Overfinch, Khan and so on. Some of the body-kits can look OK-ish, but any attempt to change the mechanics and you're saying you know better than Mercedes , Porsche and so on. You don't.
I walk past the Overfinch showroom most days and have to suppress doing a wanker sign. Give them 50 grand and they'll make your Range Rover look even more shit than it did when you gave it to them.And then there's Overfinch, Khan and so on. Some of the body-kits can look OK-ish, but any attempt to change the mechanics and you're saying you know better than Mercedes , Porsche and so on. You don't.
And then there's Overfinch, Khan and so on. Some of the body-kits can look OK-ish, but any attempt to change the mechanics and you're saying you know better than Mercedes , Porsche and so on. You don't.
I walk past the Overfinch showroom most days and have to suppress doing a wanker sign. Give them 50 grand and they'll make your Range Rover look even more shit than it did when you gave it to them.
In fairness you could take a shit on a Bentayga and it would look better.I can't 100% write these companies off on account of Onyx making the Bentayga look so much better than Bentley manage. Though it seems Bentley maybe copying some of Onyx's work with the 2019 model...
You can absolutely improve an OEM engine tune which are often compromised for reasons of emissions
Not bad but the 3rd and 4th lines need some work.There was a young man from Stab City.
Whose lowered Passat was quite shitty.
His neighbours they guffawed.
When his racing got scuppered.
And he cried to the council committee.
yeh kris showed me that picture of you taking a dump on oneIn fairness you could take a shit on a Bentayga and it would look better.
I agree about the use of speed bumps as some kind of universal panacea. But my heart still isn't bleeding for this entitled twat...that's generally not how these hings work. There was probably a grant for it and so they did it - like CCTV schemes in the Blair years. Construction companies who continually lobby politicians for favour tend to do quite well out of it. In fact there's plenty of evidence that speed humps don't really work - they bring their own problems - I'd hate to have one outside my house because of all the extra noise and pollution it would bring. Other traffic calming methods work better. Even as a cyclist I didn't like speed humps because they made motorists drive like idiots.
his neighbours guffawedThere was a young man from Stab City.
Whose lowered Passat was quite shitty.
His neighbours they guffawed.
When his racing got scuppered.
And he cried to the council committee.