Manchester is a relatively expensive city, with poorer areas for sure, but I can't imagine there being another big cultural centre being built there in the way you're suggesting might be on the cards.
They could probably make use of this: Factory International - Wikipedia
But is there already an opera venue near there? I haven't been to Manchester for years.
Interesting that you should say so, as I can't think of one either, although I've been away for quite some time.There aren't any cheap residential areas with a neighbourly feel in Manchester.
I've never understood this thing about moving things northwards supposedly being an improvement. The social divide you see in London exists in places like Rochdale, which, like any town, has its share of wealthy suburbs, populated by people with the same sense of entitlement. They would obviously continue to dominate, and the rest would maintain their indifference.Was reading about this. Fully in support of ENO being forced to move to Manchester. I also think Parliament should be moved immediately to Bradford, the High Court located in Grimsby, and all other major arts organisations spread across the country. London can keep Kew Gardens cos the plants might not travel well. Let’s take levelling up seriously.
Sure but turning it into a 'fuck londoners' thing is bullshit.Arts, media and culture in this country being massively London-centric is hardly a contentious position.
Edie, you sound a bit like that Paul Mason chap talking about Wigan I do live in Leicester, in one of the down-at-heel areas that has got shitter in the 20 or so years I've lived here... but we've got a fair bit of arts and culture here: our own and visiting orchestras, visiting operas, two large theatres and several smaller theatres, rock and pop venues, a small but vibrant jazz scene, decent museums and galleries, the Leicester Comedy Festival, the annual Pride, the annual Mela, the Caribbean Carnival, a number of bustling local festivals and the biggest Diwali party outside of India. It's hardly a cultural backwater.Try living in Whitechapel or East Ham. London has most of the poorest boroughs in the UK even without taking rents into account.
I have tried living in Leicester, and I'm certain there are impoverished areas, because there are everywhere, but it's not exactly down-at-heel.
Thing is, an opera house doesn't run on arts council funded £3 seats alone, it also needs thousands of people who're able to pay full price, every night. London and the surrounding counties are full of rich people and tourists who make up the bulk of attendees. Rochdale... isn't.If opera is gonna be three quid a night then let it be in Rochdale.
Might be nice for London to feel how the rest of the country does all the time…
Interesting that you should say so, as I can't think of one either, although I've been away for quite some time.
Shouldn't that be mothballed and everything in it divided up and moved to Carlisle and Skegness and a selection of villages? Just going by what people have said here.They could probably make use of this: Factory International - Wikipedia
Are you sure you don't want the House of Commons thrown in too? You can fight it out with Huddersfield and a handful of other places. It might make a handsome reality show if nothing else.Edie, you sound a bit like that Paul Mason chap talking about Wigan I do live in Leicester, in one of the down-at-heel areas that has got shitter in the 20 or so years I've lived here... but we've got a fair bit of arts and culture here: our own and visiting orchestras, visiting operas, two large theatres and several smaller theatres, rock and pop venues, a small but vibrant jazz scene, decent museums and galleries, the Leicester Comedy Festival, the annual Pride, the annual Mela, the Caribbean Carnival, a number of bustling local festivals and the biggest Diwali party outside of India. It's hardly a cultural backwater.
Bloody liberals.That we could do well without. I don't want to see the HoC thrown in, I want it thrown out.
Shouldn't that be mothballed and everything in it divided up and moved to Carlisle and Skegness and a selection of villages? Just going by what people have said here.
Oh well, just a thought. I suppose Leicester will have to make do with the Natural History Museum, Selfridges, and Heathrow Airport.That we could do well without. I don't want to see the HoC thrown in, I want it thrown out.
Where are these dentures of excellence atm?Oh well, just a thought. I suppose Leicester will have to make do with the Natural History Museum, Selfridges, and Heathrow Airport.
Once the rest of London has been dished out, and industries and expertise and dentures of excellence have been destroyed, everyone will realise too late that they may have their own crumb but nobody has a full slice, let alone an actual cake - and never will. All countries dislike their capital and/or primate city. Historically, culturally, it's a constant.
I thought levelling up meant (apart from bullshit Tory election sloganeering) building up areas that were currently lacking, not tearing down and moving out. Nobody suggests Broadway be broken up and moved to Ohio. France wouldn't dream of using Paris as a shopping catalogue for the rest of the country to pick what it wanted from.
Is there some threshold at which a future place will be judged to have too much and levelling up round two will have to begin? Perhaps Manchester or Edinburgh or Birmingham or Cardiff are next to be told that what's there is moving on out because there's an election to be won, or there are smug seeming local liberals to be annoyed for the fun of it.
As someone already said, Manchester already has an established company of this type, of international renown, as well as a multiplicity of venues of its own, old and new. Someone in Leicester proudly listed a few of what they've got in the face of being cast as some tumbleweed strewn hellhole where grey people only struggle through life if they have to.
Alternative arts organisations always lose outThe ENO thing is a bit of a red herring in this though isn't it? Moving it to Manchester may well be a stupid idea. But the bulk of this decision hasn't been about moving venues or organisations, it's just been about reallocating money - giving a bit more of it to existing arts organisations outside London. Which is just the fair thing to do within the current budget limits.
Keep the EMO in London by all means, but that should mean some alternative London based arts organisations losing funding instead.
No, it's not clear.I don't think 'people' have argued for anything very consistently, not even that ENO should move from London.
That was a beautiful, if bittersweet, insight into an area that obviously means a lot to you. Rich with character and characters.Interesting that you should say so, as I can't think of one either, although I've been away for quite some time.
I spent the first 35 years of my life in Manchester (1963-98), in a very cheap area. Grew up in terraced housing in Miles Platting, situated, as you probably know, less than a mile from Piccadilly. I remember a very neighbourly feel in childhood, where the 'problem neighbours,' of which there were a few, including next door to us, were kept under control by a kind of street self-policing. This all began to break down when they started demolishing the old terraces and building what we called 'the new estate,' although maisonettes and tower blocks on the part of Oldham Road immediately before the city centre (or 'town' as we called it), where my grandparents and other relatives were rehoused after resisting being shipped out to far-flung places like Hattersley or Wythenshawe, preceded it by a good few years. 'The new estate' seemed great at first, as the houses had indoor bathrooms and bigger rooms etc, but coincided with a period where anybody who could save enough to get out of the inner-city did so, if only to Failsworth, Moston or Chadderton. It was the early 1970s, when the breakdown of the post-war social democratic consensus was still not really being felt. Gradually, coinciding with the break-up of that consensus, the 'new estate' became a dumping ground for transients officially regarded as a social problem. Good people who who had no choice but to remain were gradually isolated, with only a semblance of the old community spirit remaining. People did their best, but the old MP was gone forever. I have little idea what MP is like now, although it's probably been affected by the developments around the Etihad.
Yes, there must be. It's not about money. It's about exciting ways. So let's keep the money down in London.2) Those saying 'of course, that's reasonable, yes there must be exciting ways to do this without destruction of existing facilities and networks'.
Arts Council England funds music, including popular music as well as other kinds of music, (film is the remit of BFI funding), creative writing and other forms of literature and poetry, (but not non-fiction, iirc), (TV doesn't fall under their remit, arguably a lot is state-funded via BBC and C4), large areas of visual arts, photography, (fashion's probably the remit of the British Fashion Council or whatever it's called), wide-ranging dance forms, video games might come under video arts depending on the project, some artists do work in video and get funding for their projects, musicals would come under theatre.Very few would want to though would they? Even if you trebled the level of funding. Opera (and ballet) has been a niche interest - in the UK certainly - for many many decades (was it ever popular here?). It gets funded because it is seen as culturally important and is tied in with notions of civic and national prestige. Whatever its historical importance, Its relevance to contemporary culture is highly questionable. A much stronger case can be made for theatre - where there is a clear feed in TV and film drama in terms of content and training for actors - but again its incredibly elitist and problematic in terms of access and democratisation - with most of the funding going into the big prestige theaters - especially the RSC and very little going into grassroots or supporting access for working class people.
Also worth noting that most of the most important, popular and influential cultural output since the age of mass communication - popular music, film, creative writing, TV, large areas of visual arts, photography, fashion, popular dance, video games, musicals - has received little or no state arts funding.
That is not to argue against arts funding - its more to suggest that this is where the focus on access and support should be - rather than on structures designed to preserve "high cultural" forms.
e.g - when you study music at school you are taught theory and learning scores within the orchestral tradition. Which is fine for training people to play in orchestras - but of little or no relevance to how the vast majority of music is actually created. The ability to use music programming software is way way more useful to most people interested in creating music than a deep theoretical knowledge of scales (gong off at a tangent - cos personal bugbear - there is also little or no formal teaching that encourages children to play by ear and play collaboratively - which is how most music has always been created and played) .
Shit acoustics. Supposedly been addressed. But whether it's been properly fixed or just bodged and made slightly less shit, who knows? Whether they can have redesigned/re-engineered the acoustics as if they had been designed and installed well in the first place, who knows?They could probably make use of this: Factory International - Wikipedia
Opera North is based in Leeds but does tour the region and eg brings its productions to eg The Lowry in Salford (which often gets referred to as being in Manchester).From the government that brought you 'Wokeness is a threat to Are Kultcha', massive defuding of theatres, performing arts etc, including orchestras, Donmar Warehouse theatre and English National Opera. Under the guise of 'Oooh it's levelling up', which would be fine if it were sincere, but it's mostly sounding like an empty excuse not to fund the arts.
I know many of you will not be getting out your little violins (no pun intended) but groups like ENO really were doing a lot to widen access and there is a current option on the table to move to Manchester, but that does already have Opera North, a top-class national institution in itself there.
English National Opera to leave London as arts funding gets levelled up
The Arts Council England financial announcement is the biggest shake-up of culture funding in years.www.bbc.co.uk
Actually, Arts Council England, local authorities, etc, have been funding these kinds of things through 'place-making' strategies, eg Margate, Blackpool, etc, trying to rejuvenate coastal towns/cities.Would it even require a socialist government? A half decent social democratic industrial strategy would want to increase spending on social and cultural institutions outside of the SE (and move existing resources out of London) and not just in northern cities but in towns and coastal areas too.
They should arguably get professional bid-writers on the job.They are closing our local museum, all funding they applied for was rejected. They can't even get the hole in the roof fixed. Considering whats inside that could be rather devasting for the contents...