too much squeezed in that thread i thinkIf only there was a massive and merged thread for discussing Brexit you could have avoided posting this...
Seeing as this question keeps coming up - but rarely seems to get answered to the satisfaction of the person asking - I think it's good to have thread where the proponents of Brexit can explain and precisely detail the clear benefits that we'll all be enjoying because of Brexit.If only there was a massive and merged thread for discussing Brexit you could have avoided posting this...
Can you explain? How is the CAP being reformed?ive got two:
reform of the common agricultural policy could have huge implications for land use/especially rewilding/increasing biodiversity
could also put a lot of farmers out of action, particularly animal farmers - much as i sympathise with anyone losing their way of life and work, i see that as a long-term good thing for society
So a kind of incidental benefit with a nasty bite for farmers?reform of the common agricultural policy could have huge implications for land use/especially rewilding/increasing biodiversity
could also put a lot of farmers out of action, particularly animal farmers - much as i sympathise with anyone losing their way of life and work, i see that as a long-term good thing for society
I'm struggling to see any benefits, tbh.Can some of Urban's pro-Brexit posters give us the benefits of Brexit? I'm struggling to see any.
Preferably tangible ones, not vague ideological ones.
Seeing as this question keeps coming up - but rarely seems to get answered to the satisfaction of the person asking - I think it's good to have thread where the proponents of Brexit can explain and precisely detail the clear benefits that we'll all be enjoying because of Brexit.
I'm struggling to see any benefits, tbh.
No one is compelling you to do anything.I see. So, if we aren’t satisfied with answers given on other threads we can start new ones on the same topic?
Seeing as this question keeps coming up - but rarely seems to get answered to the satisfaction of the person asking -
So a kind of incidental benefit with a nasty bite for farmers?
If only there was a massive and merged thread for discussing Brexit you could have avoided posting this...
While this is obviously a good thing, the European Parliament did vote unanimously to start the process of removing the obligatory tax on sanitary products in 2016, after pressure from the UK. Laura Coryton, who started the Stop Taxing Periods campaign, said "That process has since gone cold, because we then left the EU and we were the ones pushing for it. So if anything, actually, Brexit has made it worse, because if we were to have stayed in the EU, then this piece of legislation would have gone through… then any EU member would be able to axe the tax, not just the UK.”Already dumped Vat on sanitary products.
IrrelevantView attachment 254729
Role model
... is nothing but a call-out thread, which is against the rules.
Overlooked? The call out is being positively endorsedThat will be overlooked in this case though.
Those seem rather hypothetical. Which do you think the tories will do first?ive got two:
reform of the common agricultural policy could have huge implications for land use/especially rewilding/increasing biodiversity
could also put a lot of farmers out of action, particularly animal farmers - much as i sympathise with anyone losing their way of life and work, i see that as a long-term good thing for society
the ability of government to subsidise/nationalise via state aid laws
this has yet to be tested against the withdrawal agreement - if something was nationalised that then sold to the EU there might be some offset/trade dispute. maybe not
how much this was ever practically an issue when the UK was in the EU is disputed as it was barely ever tested, nonetheless...
too much squeezed in that thread i think
My understanding is the Common Agricultural Policy system of payments is over - not reformed, just ditched.Can you explain? How is the CAP being reformed?
The question starting this thread has not been asked in good faith with an open mind. In fact, it’s passive-aggressive from post one. So it has no chance of producing anything constructive at all and is nothing but a call-out thread, which is against the rules.
The rules have all changed post-Brexit and are up for negotiation. Each individual poster will be able to make their own tailored treaty with the moderators for their mutual benefit. All will turn out well in this best of all possible worlds.The question starting this thread has not been asked in good faith with an open mind. In fact, it’s passive-aggressive from post one. So it has no chance of producing anything constructive at all and is nothing but a call-out thread, which is against the rules.