WouldBe
Dislicksick
Where does that photo come from?Are you happy with this kind of scene? Or do you think that maybe factory chicken farming should have higher standards of welfare, whatever the cost?
View attachment 280763
Where does that photo come from?Are you happy with this kind of scene? Or do you think that maybe factory chicken farming should have higher standards of welfare, whatever the cost?
View attachment 280763
From this article:Where does that photo come from?
What this all brings home is the wildly unnatural price of chicken in the UK. Why can you buy a whole chicken at Tesco for under £3? The actual, but largely hidden, costs associated with the production of cheap chicken are not passed on to consumers. Neither are they paid by the owners of multinational meat processing conglomerates, Tesco shareholders or poultry farmers.
The costs are being paid by local communities and environments in the damage to the landscape, air and water pollution and quality of life. They are also being paid by the taxpayer, in terms of health costs or pollution clean-up costs, or renewable energy subsidy costs.
Chicken is viewed as a healthy and convenient source of protein, but there are other more sustainable, cheaper and healthier protein options which could also be grown in the UK. These include peas, beans, nuts and lentils, some of which have the advantage of fixing nitrogen in the soil rather than increasing nutrients in the environment. People could substitute such plant-based protein for chicken in many meals.
So don’t wince when you see the price of chickens raised in better conditions – there are many reasons it’s more expensive and it’s not just the better environment the animals experience. You’ll be paying farmers who resist the dominance of multinational agri-industry and who are inflicting less harm on rural communities and localities
It's an interesting point though, isn't it? It's morally repugnant that only rich people would be able to afford meat.
Indeed, the topic of the thread was the environmental impact of animal ag.It ties in with the topic of the thread, and fossil fuels do cause loads of health and environmental damage. Should we also increase the cost of jet fuel so only the rich can fly? I'm sure they'd love it but it's hardly fair on everyone else.
I mean, it looks like no broiler house I've ever been in in terms of stocking density, but the lighting/cleanliness seem rightWhere does that photo come from?
Err, because this thread is all about how to 'reduce your environmental impact on the planet,' and factory farms directly contribute to those environmental problems.Indeed, the topic of the thread was the environmental impact of animal ag.
It does seem to have moved on to welfare for no apparent reason
I mean, it looks like no broiler house I've ever been in in terms of stocking density, but the lighting/cleanliness seem right
That looks as though it's overstocked the earlier photoFrom this article:
Revealed: true cost of Britain’s addiction to factory-farmed chicken
A lack of policy has allowed industrial chicken farms to multiply in certain parts of the UK – with a lack of consideration of the environmental and social impacts.theconversation.com
Caption: Chickens raised for meat scrabble for space in an IPU
The article says:
Killing yourself will be more effective
The Guardian isn't a credible source.Unless you've visited ever broiler house in the UK I'm at a complete loss as to what your point is.
There's plenty of evidence for horrendous cruelty in factory farms e.g. Footage reveals chickens in 'horrifying conditions' at big UK producer
The Guardian isn't a credible source.
In which case you'd have no problem swiftly finding multiple credible sources that discredit this story.
Please list them here:
1.
2.
3.
Still waiting for those credible sources, Mr Trump.
Show me where I said it was fake news.Still waiting for those credible sources, Mr Trump.
I mean if it was all fake news as you;re claiming, then there must have been high profile lawsuits all over the place, yet I can't find evidence of a single one. Why is that, do you think?
So come on: produce some proof or shush now.
You declared the Guardian wasn't a credible source after I posted up that story. So now explain what isn't factual in that story and support that claim with some credible sources please.Show me where I said it was fake news.
Or is this you reading things that were never posted, again?
Groundhog day...
You're funnyYou declared the Guardian wasn't a credible source after I posted up that story. So now explain what isn't factual in that story and support that claim with some credible sources please.
Mind you, you made a big enough fool of yourself with your bizarre denial about the total dominance of chicken factory farming in the UK, so I expect you'll go into another foot-shooting bout of denial.
It's an interesting point though, isn't it? It's morally repugnant that only rich people would be able to afford meat.
Might be worth taking that up with the supermarkets, seeing as the consumer has no control over it.Plenty of poor people (and indeed rich people) get by quite happily (and healthily) on very little or no meat. I find it more morally repugnant that it's a race to the bottom as far as animal welfare is concerned.
Might be worth taking that up with the supermarkets, seeing as the consumer has no control over it.
Lots of people can't afford anything more expensive. Do you think they shouldn't eat meat?The consumer can decide to buy meat of animals that have been raised in higher welfare conditions. They can also choose to buy less, or indeed no, meat.
Lots of people can't afford anything more expensive. Do you think they shouldn't eat meat?
There are plenty of people who couldn't afford one chicken a week if the price doubled. Do you think this would be a good thing?It's more important that people have access to generally healthy food than tonnes of meat. There are also ways of stretching meat out - including the flavour of meat and perhaps a few chunks of meat in a dish rather than eating lots of it. Do you think everyone in the world eats meat everyday? Do you think they ought to, or have a right to regardless of the cruelty or environmental consequences, especially when there are perfectly healthy alternatives?
Sounds like wages and benefits need to increase to me.There are plenty of people who couldn't afford one chicken a week if the price doubled. Do you think this would be a good thing?
There are plenty of people who couldn't afford one chicken a week if the price doubled. Do you think this would be a good thing?
^^^^ first reply to this thread.
Still as valid as when it was posted.
What will happen to the cost of food if the cost of wages increases?Sounds like wages and benefits need to increase to me.