Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Aristocrat's daughter on the run with sex offender and newborn

Maybe it's something to do with the baby? Like if they don't have a baby seat or something? I've never tried to travel with a baby in a taxi so idk how it works
I doubt it, black cabs are the only ones you can flag down in London and they take babies in pushchairs. I suspect their appearance and belongings were factors, black cabs are very circumspect about whether you look like you can pay (the least worst of the reasons I can think of :()
 
Just a suggestion that made sense to me as an answer. Cabs do also stop, and then refuse - as I know to my cost, having grown up in the West End but with a father and grandparents who were Peckham people. Going to visit, you’d think ‘great, he’s stopped’, and once you’d said ‘can you go to Peckham?’ they’d say ‘sorry, I’m not going that way’ and off they’d go. It can take a few misses before you get a hit.
OK. Obviously different in different places. In Glasgow, if they stop they’re going to take you. Unless, like I say, they think you’re going to throw up in the back. Or not pay.
 
OK. Obviously different in different places. In Glasgow, if they stop they’re going to take you. Unless, like I say, they think you’re going to throw up in the back. Or not pay.
It’s just because it’s so much harder once you cross the river for them to rely on being flagged down after your fare. They're suddenly not running around Central London where fares are ten a penny, but will have to drive back there to get back on track. If you’re going south, it’s best to get in and get sat down before revealing that. Take your jacket off too, ideally, and get really comfortable before you hit them with the news.
 
It’s just because it’s so much harder once you cross the river for them to rely on being flagged down after your fare. They're suddenly not running around Central London where fares are ten a penny, but will have to drive back there to get back on track. If you’re going south, it’s best to get in and get sat down before revealing that. Take your jacket off too, ideally, and get really comfortable before you hit them with the news.
No, I get that. I’ve seen it on TV.
 
No, I get that. I’ve seen it on TV.
Well, it’s not just a TV trope, it’s an actual thing. Should you ever need to, take my advice and wangle your way into the back first, get sat down, scatter your stuff around to make it clear you’re not getting up again (because if you don’t, they might even ask you to hop out - I’ve had that now and then too), let them pull off into traffic (sighing and being generally distracted gets them into a false sense of comfort enough to head off from the kerb), and then say it.

If these cabs were in London, that seems to me to be an obvious explanation for why they couldn’t even get a single one.
 
OK. Obviously different in different places. In Glasgow, if they stop they’re going to take you. Unless, like I say, they think you’re going to throw up in the back. Or not pay.
I think London black cabs are meant to take you if they stop and your destination's within a certain distance of central London or something but in practice... 🤷‍♀️
 
Last edited:
I looked at this thread before I went to bed last night and my conclusion was...

20 pages
2 bun fights
1 flounce
A car chase

Looks like it going to plan.
Not bad for a bunch of Baby Eating Surrender Monkeys/Anarchists (whichever 'era' you're from).
 
  • Like
Reactions: tim
The flagging down of cabs thing. I suspect there's pretty good cctv coverage of Whitechapel Rd near that Argos. I know that area well, and I've been to that very Argos a couple of times too. I could imagine how two people with a baby, pushchair, a tent (probably in a box), and two sleeping bags would've looked a bit :hmm:

It seems after being refused 3 times they just went off down Brick lane towards Bethnal Green Road and dumped the pushchair along the way somewhere. So sad.
 
The flagging down of cabs thing. I suspect there's pretty good cctv coverage of Whitechapel Rd near that Argos. I know that area well, and I've been to that very Argos a couple of times too. I could imagine how two people with a baby, pushchair, a tent (probably in a box), and two sleeping bags would've looked a bit :hmm:

It seems after being refused 3 times they just went off down Brick lane towards Bethnal Green Road and dumped the pushchair along the way somewhere. So sad.
There's also hardly anywhere cabs can actually stop on Whitechapel Rd as well tbf.
 
They've left the country then, haven't they?

I mean it certainly looks like they tried to at Harwich. Why would anyone go there otherwise?

If they're trying to get a boat from somewhere else, Newhaven doesn't seem an obvious choice, it's halfway between Portsmouth and Dover if that counts for anything. I don't even know if they have the means to leave the country. A lot of ferries don't take foot passengers these days. I think P&O do fwiw.
 
They won't have been able to take the baby out of the country with no passport either.
If you followed GBNews more avidly you would know that there are clearly unofficial ways of entering the country via the English Channel. With money, it won't be too much of a challenge to go the other way.
 
It's quite possible that they don't know how difficult it would be for a young family to get across the channel without any official entanglements.

They might just thought they could turn up at some middling fishing/cargo port, and walk up and down the quayside flashing a wedge of used 50's and eventually you'd find a coaster or fishing vessel that would drop you off in the dark, sans immigration control, at some little fishing village on the other side of the water.

It may have even worked - the criminal penalities for the crew who provided such a clandestine service would be harsh in the extreme, which would explain why they wouldn't come forward now there's lots of publicity.
 
Lots of abandoned WWII bunkers in Newhaven to hide in, last place they were seen is not far from HMS Forward which is a big complex of tunnels.
 
6 new images released and police now saying they moved on from East London to Newhaven, East Sussex on the Sunday.

New pictures released of missing couple and newborn baby as £10k reward offered for information

In that article, the reporter says:

Police say their baby has been exposed to sub-zero temperatures for almost a month and the couple were "constantly moving and awake for at least a few days" after the birth.

But on clicking that article, it doesn't seem to be what they said, according to one of Sky's own reports on the 24th:

Detective Superintendent Lewis Basford, who is leading the investigation, expressed his concern for the safety of the newborn baby, who he believes has been exposed to sub-freezing cold temperatures, and urged the public to look out for the family.

The baby couldn't even have been 3 weeks old then, and nowhere in either article does it say the police are certain they've been living outdoors for the entire time. So unless I'm misunderstanding something, I'm thinking Sky are being somewhat sloppy or dishonest with their reporting here.

It's quite possible that they don't know how difficult it would be for a young family to get across the channel without any official entanglements.

They might just thought they could turn up at some middling fishing/cargo port, and walk up and down the quayside flashing a wedge of used 50's and eventually you'd find a coaster or fishing vessel that would drop you off in the dark, sans immigration control, at some little fishing village on the other side of the water.

It may have even worked - the criminal penalities for the crew who provided such a clandestine service would be harsh in the extreme, which would explain why they wouldn't come forward now there's lots of publicity.

Your last sentence - that could be the case, and also for anyone who's helped them with lifts, lodging or whatever. There were reports earlier in the month that they had a substantial amount of cash on them.
 
It's quite possible that they don't know how difficult it would be for a young family to get across the channel without any official entanglements.

They might just thought they could turn up at some middling fishing/cargo port, and walk up and down the quayside flashing a wedge of used 50's and eventually you'd find a coaster or fishing vessel that would drop you off in the dark, sans immigration control, at some little fishing village on the other side of the water.

It may have even worked - the criminal penalities for the crew who provided such a clandestine service would be harsh in the extreme, which would explain why they wouldn't come forward now there's lots of publicity.
Or dropped off in the dark between Britain and France and relieved of their vast wad of cash
 
The police have previous in situations exactly like this saying they won't prosecute and then going back on their word with baby Jade in 2013

Where does it say the police said they wouldn't prosecute? Not that it would surprise me much.
 
Where does it say the police said they wouldn't prosecute? Not that it would surprise me much.
Can't find a direct quote (I remembered it from the radio) but you can see the tone indirectly in these two articles


 
Back
Top Bottom