Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Aristocrat's daughter on the run with sex offender and newborn

That's something interesting I didn't know, is it on your checklist to make sure of that? I don't remember anyone doing anything like that when mine were born but I was kinda distracted.
Yes most definitely on the checklist! Have to make sure all the membranes are intact and also any anomalies- calcified bits- smokers have gritty bits I seem to remember.
 
It doesn't take a genius to realise that the reason for this alert and the massive resources being poured into the response, is that one or both have either killed or seriously injured or assaulted (sexually or otherwise) a baby before

the police do not think this according to the article

"We don't believe as a couple that they're looking to intentionally harm the baby, but we do know that those conditions and the fact they've had no medical attention since the birth could be a significant risk to the baby."
 
£10k reward for info on this couple now.

Detectives say their baby has been exposed to sub-zero temperatures for almost a month and the couple were "constantly moving and awake for at least a few days" after the birth.

How do they know about the constant 'being awake' - how is that possible? There's so much confusing about all this.
 
£10k reward for info on this couple now.



How do they know about the constant 'being awake' - how is that possible? There's so much confusing about all this.
could it be they're talking shit?
 
So here's what's been established (abbreviated from the met website)

Thursday, 5 January (18:33hrs), officers were called to a car on fire on the hard-shoulder of the M61, near junction four (Farnworth, Bolton). The occupants are not at the scene. Enquiries revealed that Constance and Mark were the occupants of the car and that Constance had very recently given birth, possibly one or two days before, and had not been assessed by medical professionals.

Friday, 6 January (03:30hrs) Officers believe they then travelled to Liverpool and then onwards to Harwich via a taxi. Mark, Constance and a baby were seen by a member of the public in Harwich at about 09:00hrs on Saturday, 7 January. Officers also received a number of confirmed sightings of the family in Colchester on Friday, 6 January and Saturday, 7 January.

Saturday, 7 January (10:30hrs and 12:30hrs) Essex Police carried out a number of enquiries and reviewed hours of CCTV and were able to place the couple near East Ham Station. They took a taxi from East Ham, being dropped off in Whitechapel Road at 18:14hrs. They went into Argos on Whitechapel Road, E1, at 18:19hrs on Saturday, 7 January to buy camping gear. Mark went in alone and bought two big bags full of items, paying in cash, including a blue two-man tent, two sleeping bags and two pillows. He left the store at 18:40hrs. They then spent slightly more than three hours walking around the Whitechapel Road area. They tried to flag down three black cabs, but were refused. They then left the area on foot and were last seen walking along Brick Lane, towards Bethnal Green Road, at 22:01hrs on Saturday, 7 January. Mark is often seen walking alone ahead of Constance and the baby.

This is the last official sighting of them.

It all sounds really desperate. A car fire, a newborn baby. All that moving around between Bolton, Liverpool, Harwich, Colchester, East London in a 48hr period. Camping gear? :( The poor mother and baby.
 
Doesn’t the UK have the most cctv other than China? I’m sure it’s possible to track someone forensically like this if you throw enough resources at it
Pretty much every other house on my street as a video doorbell so I'd assume that provides a lot of the coverage.
 
In general CCTV is good for confirming what's already happened but the Jason Borne style tracking people in real time isn't an option. You're also probably not going to get access to it all in chronological order either, so it might have taken a while to fill in gaps. It might be that the police assumed the couple had decent transport and were getting from A-B quick enough to rest at B but have now discovered they're on foot or something
 
I think the 'all that moving around' is the answer to how they know they've been awake for a lot of the time. I don't think it's meant entirely literally but clearly if you're on the move constantly you're probably not getting your 8 hours.
 
I think the 'all that moving around' is the answer to how they know they've been awake for a lot of the time. I don't think it's meant entirely literally but clearly if you're on the move constantly you're probably not getting your 8 hours.
which is rather at odds with the 'they've bought a load of camping gear' and 'we don't know where they are and here's a large reward to show that we really don't know where they are'
 
The 'moving about' was a few days after the birth, which was almost a month ago, but might have had serious consequences on the mothers mental state.
 
Something I’ve noticed in reports is that a few times we’ve been told they were refused black cabs they flagged down.

So, the drivers must have passed that on or how would the cops know? Also, why are they being refused? In my experience if you’re very drunk. Maybe potentially if the driver doesn’t think you have money? Normally they just won’t pull over if they try to flag them down and they aren’t interested. So whats going on there?
 
Something I’ve noticed in reports is that a few times we’ve been told they were refused black cabs they flagged down.

So, the drivers must have passed that on or how would the cops know? Also, why are they being refused? In my experience if you’re very drunk. Maybe potentially if the driver doesn’t think you have money? Normally they just won’t pull over if they try to flag them down and they aren’t interested. So whats going on there?
Maybe they were trying to go south of the river. Standing on the ‘wrong’ side of the road, looking like that’s your destination, can be enough.
 
Something I’ve noticed in reports is that a few times we’ve been told they were refused black cabs they flagged down.

So, the drivers must have passed that on or how would the cops know? Also, why are they being refused? In my experience if you’re very drunk. Maybe potentially if the driver doesn’t think you have money? Normally they just won’t pull over if they try to flag them down and they aren’t interested. So whats going on there?
Maybe it's something to do with the baby? Like if they don't have a baby seat or something? I've never tried to travel with a baby in a taxi so idk how it works
 
Maybe they were trying to go south of the river. Standing on the ‘wrong’ side of the road, looking like that’s your destination, can be enough.
So why are the cabs stopping and not just driving past? That’s what I’m wondering. It sounds more like an interaction that’s being reported rather than a non interaction, ifswim. (Also they’ve been outside London at least some of the time, so it’s not just a London thing).
 
Something I’ve noticed in reports is that a few times we’ve been told they were refused black cabs they flagged down.

So, the drivers must have passed that on or how would the cops know? Also, why are they being refused? In my experience if you’re very drunk. Maybe potentially if the driver doesn’t think you have money? Normally they just won’t pull over if they try to flag them down and they aren’t interested. So whats going on there?
The cops might have seen it on cctv.
 
Something I’ve noticed in reports is that a few times we’ve been told they were refused black cabs they flagged down.

So, the drivers must have passed that on or how would the cops know? Also, why are they being refused? In my experience if you’re very drunk. Maybe potentially if the driver doesn’t think you have money? Normally they just won’t pull over if they try to flag them down and they aren’t interested. So whats going on there?
I'd assume they'd watched the CCTV and seen them try to flag down taxis.

Maybe they were asking to go a long way and didn't on the face of it look like they'd have the money?

You don't need a car seat in a taxi, you can hold the baby or just put the whole push chair in.
 
So why are the cabs stopping and not just driving past? That’s what I’m wondering. It sounds more like an interaction that’s being reported rather than a non interaction, ifswim. (Also they’ve been outside London at least some of the time, so it’s not just a London thing).
Just a suggestion that made sense to me as an answer. Cabs do also stop, and then refuse when you’ve revealed your intentions before getting in - as I know to my cost, having grown up in the West End but with a father and grandparents who were Peckham people. Going to visit, you’d think ‘great, he’s stopped’, and once you’d said ‘can you go to Peckham?’ they’d say ‘sorry, I’m not going that way’ and off they’d go. It can take a few misses before you get a hit.
 
Back
Top Bottom