charlie mowbray
The Enforcer
I would say that Solfed definitely is another anarchist groupuscule, although claiming to be a union.
Plenty examples of high functioning drunkards doing useful/good things. Hallas was one such.Drunken Hallas?Give us a break!
I once picked him up from Manchester Piccadily where a small trail of beer cans clattered as he alighted from the carriage.Drunken Hallas?Give us a break!
It's comparing apples and oranges. Anarchist communist organisations and unions have very different functions. Under the current system (at least in a bourgeis liberal democratic system like the UK), organising in the workplace as a union, though not easy, will always be miles more easy than attempting to build a revolutionary movement.The IWW isn't an anarchist organisation, it should probably be pointed out. Just one with anarchists in it. And, as a union, they've probably achieved more than all the UK anarchist and trot organisations put together over the last few years (even if it still isn't very much).
We need physical infrastructure. Social Centres, bookshops, social clubs, infocentres etc. alongside stable - and welcoming - groups to engage with. Points of f2f contact.
There's bits of this, but it's fragmented, exclusionary and often off-putting. Often only last a 'generation' before vanishing without a trace.
What happens to us when we get older, get families, responsibilities and have more to lose?
Retention is perhaps more important than recruitment if you think of the 10s (maybe 100s) of thousands who have passed through (or close by) the milieu and are still sympathetic but have no connection to the scene anymore.
I don't think the base unions are "anarchist successes" there's too much of the hierarchical in the IWGB and CAIWU, UVW less so. I'm just emphasising that they probably have achieved more workplace organising than the IWW. As to success, how do you measure that? Can winning a few small wage demands, getting withheld pay or reinstatement,though worth fighting for, be compared to a substantial raising of class consciousness?Sure. That doesn't affect my point tho.
The IWW also organised the bike couriers successfully in Sheff & a few other places. But if you wanted to include the base unions as anarchist successes, then the scene is probably better than any any time I can remember, at least since the poll tax.
there are some permanent features of the anarchist milieu, eg freedom, larc, 56a: and there have been many more or less ephemeral social spaces - the 121 centre, rampart, the sutton street squat, various social squatted social centres - but i don't know whether we need more institutions with their tendency towards institutionalisation. if you look back at the history of other movements, they have had venues which played a major part and then passed on: for example, the chartists had the eclectic hall, the irish nationalists premises on grafton street, now gone but formerly near cambridge circus, and rooms on chancery lane. the simple thing about anarchist groups is none of them have the money required to get the sort of spaces you want legally - larc a very unusual space in that regard. of the national anarchist groups, i know cw scraped by on a couple of grand a year, of which maybe half was raised at the bookfair. i don't suppose the national anarchist groups of today have much more than that, if that. if it's a choice between funding a short-lived social space or producing stickers, t-shirts and other propaganda, i suspect most groups would go for the latter.We need physical infrastructure. Social Centres, bookshops, social clubs, infocentres etc. alongside stable - and welcoming - groups to engage with. Points of f2f contact.
There's bits of this, but it's fragmented, exclusionary and often off-putting. Often only last a 'generation' before vanishing without a trace.
What happens to us when we get older, get families, responsibilities and have more to lose?
Retention is perhaps more important than recruitment if you think of the 10s (maybe 100s) of thousands who have passed through (or close by) the milieu and are still sympathetic but have no connection to the scene anymore.
We need physical infrastructure. Social Centres, bookshops, social clubs, infocentres etc. alongside stable - and welcoming - groups to engage with. Points of f2f contact.
There's bits of this, but it's fragmented, exclusionary and often off-putting. Often only last a 'generation' before vanishing without a trace.
What happens to us when we get older, get families, responsibilities and have more to lose?
Retention is perhaps more important than recruitment if you think of the 10s (maybe 100s) of thousands who have passed through (or close by) the milieu and are still sympathetic but have no connection to the scene anymore.
there are some permanent features of the anarchist milieu, eg freedom, larc, 56a: and there have been many more or less ephemeral social spaces - the 121 centre, rampart, the sutton street squat, various social squatted social centres - but i don't know whether we need more institutions with their tendency towards institutionalisation. if you look back at the history of other movements, they have had venues which played a major part and then passed on: for example, the chartists had the eclectic hall, the irish nationalists premises on grafton street, now gone but formerly near cambridge circus, and rooms on chancery lane. the simple thing about anarchist groups is none of them have the money required to get the sort of spaces you want legally - larc a very unusual space in that regard. of the national anarchist groups, i know cw scraped by on a couple of grand a year, of which maybe half was raised at the bookfair. i don't suppose the national anarchist groups of today have much more than that, if that. if it's a choice between funding a short-lived social space or producing stickers, t-shirts and other propaganda, i suspect most groups would go for the latter.
and social spaces are bloody hard work. with the squats the finding, the cracking, the cleaning and the retaining takes a great deal of energy - let alone the effort needed to ensuring the spaces are at least vaguely welcoming. the wombles spent a great deal of time and energy opening up various social centres and i know it was very wearing on them doing that.
so yes, it would be nice to have more spaces to meet, to introduce new people to the scene and for returning friends to get together. but the work for these has always fallen on a few people, who can be burnt out by the experience.
sorry to be negative - i'd be interested to hear how you think that the difficulties to getting longstanding or permanent places together might be overcome
if you want an anarchist presence in public that really means taking to the streets on a far more regular basis than is done at the moment.I take (and generally agree with) your points LDC and Pickman's model but ...
...if we want a sustained - and sustainable - organised Anarchist presence in public I think that this is the nettle that needs to be grasped.
However, I'm not 100% convinced that maintaining this Anarchist presence is worth the effort it would take. Maybe time to let Anarchism fade away and see what else appears in its stead? Surely anti-authoritarian and democratic praxis can take other forms?
Indeed, but - again - the old "demo infrastructure" has gone. The flyposting, the (usually SWP organised) coaches from all over. The local stalls and sign ups.if you want an anarchist presence in public that really means taking to the streets on a far more regular basis than is done at the moment.
...I'm not 100% convinced that maintaining this Anarchist presence is worth the effort it would take. Maybe time to let Anarchism fade away and see what else appears in its stead? Surely anti-authoritarian and democratic praxis can take other forms?
Yeah, the difference with those is broadly as I said they emerge from a wide struggle or movement rather than the anarchist way round that uses them to try and create a movement.
See, in some ways, I'm tempted to agree with you, but on the other hand, over the last few years, "letting Anarchism fade away and seeing what else appears in its stead" seems like it's mostly ended up with either joining Labour or else deliberately getting arrested to stop climate change, which makes me think that maybe people could do with a bit more sitting down reading dusty Malatesta PDFs, or sending each other pictures of capybaras or whatever.However, I'm not 100% convinced that maintaining this Anarchist presence is worth the effort it would take. Maybe time to let Anarchism fade away and see what else appears in its stead? Surely anti-authoritarian and democratic praxis can take other forms?
*no, not that kind of specific
It's not either/or. Maximising the chance for something to emerge involves having infrastructure and projects in place that can accelerate the process. "Build it and they will come" is overrated but if you have nothing to offer those who do show up can swiftly disappear again. And movements don't often appear entirely from nowhere.
I'm in a weird place when it comes to the scene atm. I'll acknowledge the general malaise, but on a personal level I've been trying to help get Freedom to work right for decades now, and we've finally gotten the damn thing to be vaguely self sustaining with a bookshop that pays its way, a publishing outfit that sells well enough to renew/expand our slate of titles, a reasonably regular news wire and rooms hosting multiple groups. So my corner is actually on the up, touch wood.
On another positive note, this year's Earth First summer gathering is their boldest in quite a while
Earth First! – Build a culture of active non-hierarchical grassroots ecological resistance
Which follows on from quite a decently organised climate camp last month
Climate Camp wraps up after Ineos confrontation - Freedom News
Following well-organised protests at the site of Scotland’s biggest polluter the camp at Kinneil, Grangemouth has been tidied away and legal support is now ongoing for nine people who were detained over the weekend. The camp was sited just a mile away from Ineos’ headquarters to the east of...freedomnews.org.uk
This stuff is happening largely outside internet social media bubbles mind.
AnarCom Net’s annual report.
Class Report ’23
December marks the 1st anniversary of our formal constitution as the AnarCom Network, an organisation of internationalist revolutionary class-struggle anarchist-communists. Despite having bee…anarcomuk.uk
View attachment 401872
Tldr: there’s not a lot of us but we do more or less what you’d expect. (Except the brass section might be a surprise).I may actually read this one though.
So-The way that the phrase "Class Report" is spread over two lines makes me itch.