Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Are you a Nazi? Let Jane Austen fix that for you.

Dostoevszky is more of a crime
Were we talking earlier? About Dostoevsky? Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky, born 11 November 1821 – died 9 February 1881?
Just interested in him being exiled in Siberia four years. All it is is that he was a member of a secret political party, and they put him in a Siberian labour camp for four years, so, ya know.
 
Were we talking earlier? About Dostoevsky? Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky, born 11 November 1821 – died 9 February 1881?
Just interested in him being exiled in Siberia four years. All it is is that he was a member of a secret political party, and they put him in a Siberian labour camp for four years, so, ya know.
yes sorry I was playing on the crime and punishment gag that SpookyFrank did much more subtly and so nobody including myself noticed :(
 
i don't see how. i've cheerfully read books by lots of other women writers, eg marie correlli, george eliot, dorothy macardle and c.l. moore. the only three authors i have no interest in reading are virginia woolf and jane austen and thomas hardy. and it's got nothing to do with two of them being women.
But is it cos one of them's Chinese?[/reference to incredibly obscure literary drama from about seven years ago]
 
i don't see how. i've cheerfully read books by lots of other women writers, eg marie correlli, george eliot, dorothy macardle and c.l. moore. the only three authors i have no interest in reading are virginia woolf and jane austen and thomas hardy. and it's got nothing to do with two of them being women.

Thomas Hardy is just pre-industrial Eastenders. Undifferentiated misery and hopelessness.
 
Given Austin was writing in the middle of a world war and as the industrial revolution was just starting to kick of it’s a amazing how much of a vacum she writes in, as RubyToogood says, , but she remains very funny. Pride and Prejudice and Zombies ( the film I haven’t read the book) is really funny but hilarious if you know the book.

Thomas Hardy paints great pictures of life at the turn of the 19th century but again as SpookyFrank says is really fucking depressing especially for women characters…

Dickins just too long with sentences that just meander all over the shop.

It is interesting to read things from the past as it rubs your nose in the fact that the world we are in isn’t the only one and aloe that people don’t change much.
 
What's the sentence? You wouldn't suggest eg remembrance of times past to someone getting hanged in the morning
I suppose the other question is, can anyone think of much Victorian literature likely to be more counter-productive than a custodial sentence?
 
Silas Marner, not too long, satisfying ending.
I had to do this for CSE English and I blame it for the grade 3 I got. Starts OK, finishes OK, but from what I recall Silas spends 100 pages in the middle just fucking weaving.

I'm not all that about Jane Austin either. Read Pride and Predudice a couple of years ago and it was pretty dull. It picked up towards the end, but I'm not in a rush to read any of her others. I might give Middlemarch a go after reading this thread though.
 
Back
Top Bottom