Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
aneurysm bevenYou seem to be confusing Aneurin Bevan and Ernest Bevin
aneurysm bevenYou seem to be confusing Aneurin Bevan and Ernest Bevin
Brendan Bracken said those things across Beaverbook's dinner table as Bevan was sat across it drinking the pro-fascist arsehole's champagne.
This is in every single biogrpahy - even Foots (also a beaverbrook groupie) hagiography. This is just standard very well known political history.Have you got a link for this, I couldnt find any that went into any depth and weren't behind a paywall. And taking the word of Bracken, who was most likely behind the prostitute incident, is not something I'm going to do without a few shovelfuls of salt to go with it.
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=2XrPoA9AqMIC&pg=PA18&lpg=PA18&dq=bevan bollinger bolshevik&source=bl&ots=a4rJ17MS0W&sig=8hFsPI6oKNVEssYC4rrTDeekl3o&hl=en&sa=X&ei=EGFmUvXRO6mM0AW6h4H4CQ&ved=0CD0Q6AEwAwHave you got a link for this, I couldnt find any that went into any depth and weren't behind a paywall. And taking the word of Bracken, who was most likely behind the prostitute incident, is not something I'm going to do without a few shovelfuls of salt to go with it.
It was almost always handbags to be fair. It's a long time since Pete Mastin made an arse of himself chasing a comrade around Conway Hall before being neutralised by a female Red Action/Class War comrade
Now this is rather vague, but in so far as I can extract meaning from it, it seems to amount to this: to have a different view to the writer on the feminist debates around prostitution is not just wrong, but threatening, inappropriate and not allowed in anarchist "space".
???Also, briefly drummed for Black Sabbath.
Bevin/an - okay, I'm a page too late.
Bevin/an - okay, I'm a page too late.
aside from all this Kill All Men stuff it sounds like the "Assangists" were completely out of order - the taking pictures and filming people bit is very suspect. Is there any other report of this other than Sams blog?http://samambreen.wordpress.com/2013/10/21/yes-kill-all-men/
A follow up.
The core of it is that "these three words" "empower us somewhat with your reactions". Which is to say it's again justified not in tactical terms (eg convincing others) but in internal psychological terms.
On another note, communists aren't welcome at the Manchester and Salford Anarchist Bookfair... liberals and hippies are though, of course.
aside from all this Kill All Men stuff it sounds like the "Assangists" were completely out of order - the taking pictures and filming people bit is very suspect. Is there any other report of this other than Sams blog?
what will happen if 'communists' turn up and soapbox? How should provocative and confrontational opponents be treated?On another note, communists aren't welcome at the Manchester and Salford Anarchist Bookfair... liberals and hippies are though, of course.
aside from all this Kill All Men stuff it sounds like the "Assangists" were completely out of order - the taking pictures and filming people bit is very suspect. Is there any other report of this other than Sams blog?
On another note, communists aren't welcome at the Manchester and Salford Anarchist Bookfair... liberals and hippies are though, of course.
Really? How so?
No statement as of yet, but there's an email going round afaik.
What is meant by "communists"? Trots? or is it a more specific continuation of a historical feud with the ICC or something?
What is meant by "communists"? Trots? or is it a more specific continuation of a historical feud with the ICC or something?
http://samambreen.wordpress.com/2013/10/21/yes-kill-all-men/
Perhaps its time for Proletarian Democracy to set up a men's caucus for the specific purpose of issuing formal apologies? If our intersectionalist bros don't step up to the place?