Amanda Knox Is Innocent

[Stanley Edwards]

Yeah, like Knox saying she was at her boyfriend's house, and her boyfriend saying he was alone, online etc...only he wasn't. Strange, yes.

Where did he say that?

It's a fucking messy case just getting even more messy.

What I find difficult to accept is the fact that almost all involved in the case came from connected families (albeit, Guede coming from an 'adopted' business family).

The only thing I have read with regards to Knox's boyfriend saying he was alone was during police interrogation where he admitted 'it may have been possible that she left whilst I was asleep'. Where's the online stuff from?

The whole thing is very strange. Why did the local police allow a flatmate to breakdown the door when they were apparently waiting for the Carabinieri?

 

[Anudder Oik]

I'd say that was pretty accurate.

I really think that anyone who looks into this case in any detail must conclude that she is innocent. Perfect example of a media stitch-up.

From what I have gathered in conversation tonite with a friend, who has studied the case, she is guilty.

Victim killed between 9 and 11 at night.
Police arrive next morning at 12.30 to report finding victims mobile phone in a garden. Knox and boyfriend open door and immediately say they have already phoned the police (They haven't, it's a lie). They are cleaning the house, it smells strongly of bleach. Knox shows concern about victim's door being locked.

Forensic evidence includes bloody footprints (washed) of 2 people in bare feet, a man and a woman. Blood must be fresh and in liquid form to attach to foot, so 2 individuals walked in a pool of blood in bare feet. There is also the trainer prints in blood of the other guy now doing time.

Whole Knox defence is based on questioning forensic evidence with phrases that begin with; perhaps, could be, maybe...

Knox and boyfriend both switched off mobiles an hour before victim was due home. They had never done this before, according to phone records.

Knox and boyfriend were due, the morning the body was discovered, to go on an excursion with boyfriends father. Instead they are at the home cleaning the house with bleach.

Minute blood spots on light switch and floor contained mixed DNA samples from both Knox and victim.

Victims clothes found recently washed in washing machine.

Knox boyfriend's DNA on victim's bra clasp which was cut with a knife.

Pathologist report states 2 or more attackers as victim was restrained whilst sexually abused.

Knox framed Lumumba until the other guy was caught in germany, then changed her story. She was long before that, surrounded and supported by her family and expensive lawyers and unlikely to be badly treated by police. So why delay changing her story?

 

[Riklet]

Guilty as sin, basically. White and rich enough to challenge that though...

ie 'fuck off dwyer'

 

[Anudder Oik]

We need to ignore the italian gutter press and the american news reports paid for by the rich Knox family.

An italian judge reckons Knox is close to confessing. If not we are in for another 3 years of this until appeals run out.

 

[Stanley Edwards]

We need to ignore the italian gutter press and the american news reports paid for by the rich Knox family...

Don't ignore the fact that the victims father was a freelance hack also.

It's all fucking warped and very, very sad.

 

[Anudder Oik]

The Knox defence paid a convicted sex offender, who shared a cell with Rudy Guede, 80,000 euros to say that he had confessed to him that he was the "lone" author of the murder. The sex offender will now not be appearing as a witness in the case.

 

[Pickman's model]

Don't ignore the fact that the victims father was a freelance hack also.

and his daughter was hacked.

 

[Anudder Oik]

Fact: Only one fingerprint from Knox was found in the whole house where she lived. Everything had been wiped.

 

[Pickman's model]

Fact: Only one fingerprint from Knox was found in the whole house where she lived. Everything had been wiped.

where was the fingerprint?

 

[Anudder Oik]

where was the fingerprint?

On a glass in the kitchen.

 

[Anudder Oik]

The main focus of the Knox defence team has been to try to have the footprint DNA evidence kicked out by claiming the scene was contaminated. But then they would, wouldn't they.

 

[Yuwipi Woman]

On a glass in the kitchen.

That's an odd thing to miss if you've washed the rest of the place down with bleach.

 

[Anudder Oik]

Lifted from a Newsweek blog.

The prosecution had also introduced evidence about the washing machine in the villa where the murder took place. Filomena Romanelli, the Italian from whom Knox and Kercher sublet rooms in the villa, testified that the washing machine was warm when she arrived on the scene. She later identified the contents of the washing machine as Kercher's even though the Briton had been dead for at least 10 hours before her body was found, implying that someone else started the laundry.

 

[ATOMIC SUPLEX]

Yes Dwyer, we know it goes without saying you are a dick so no need to prove it with your petty posting.
Back on topic, if you really think that that there is not even the slightest possibility Knox is guilty then you are an enormous fool, so much so that even though I know from experience that you are at the very least 'a pompous idiot', I suspect that this is just an exercise in trollisum . Of course there is the slightest of slight chance that she is innocent too, but if you have followed the case (which you quite clearly have not) it seems to err more to the side of certain evidence being unsubmitable due to a technicality, married with reasonable doubt.

 

[DotCommunist]

I'm suprised the teflon don hasn't pardoned her personally given his eye for the ladies.

 

[Citizen66]

Psychopaths are considered to be disproportionately responsible for violent acts, [...]

A definition of a psychopath that I read somewhere (perhaps even on here) is someone who places their own wants above other people's needs. Using that definition: taking someone's life in order to gain sexual satisfaction from them leans strongly towards them being of that disposition.

 

[phildwyer]

She seems guilty as sin, but then this is just based upon the media's manipulation of me, and my hatred of hot girls.

And the fact that you have the IQ of a walnut, tbf.

 

[phildwyer]

From what I have gathered in conversation tonite with a friend, who has studied the case, she is guilty.

Victim killed between 9 and 11 at night.
Police arrive next morning at 12.30 to report finding victims mobile phone in a garden. Knox and boyfriend open door and immediately say they have already phoned the police (They haven't, it's a lie). They are cleaning the house, it smells strongly of bleach. Knox shows concern about victim's door being locked.

Forensic evidence includes bloody footprints (washed) of 2 people in bare feet, a man and a woman. Blood must be fresh and in liquid form to attach to foot, so 2 individuals walked in a pool of blood in bare feet. There is also the trainer prints in blood of the other guy now doing time.

Whole Knox defence is based on questioning forensic evidence with phrases that begin with; perhaps, could be, maybe...

Knox and boyfriend both switched off mobiles an hour before victim was due home. They had never done this before, according to phone records.

Knox and boyfriend were due, the morning the body was discovered, to go on an excursion with boyfriends father. Instead they are at the home cleaning the house with bleach.

Minute blood spots on light switch and floor contained mixed DNA samples from both Knox and victim.

Victims clothes found recently washed in washing machine.

Knox boyfriend's DNA on victim's bra clasp which was cut with a knife.

Pathologist report states 2 or more attackers as victim was restrained whilst sexually abused.

Knox framed Lumumba until the other guy was caught in germany, then changed her story. She was long before that, surrounded and supported by her family and expensive lawyers and unlikely to be badly treated by police. So why delay changing her story?

Well, she's admitted that she panicked after finding the body, and said and did foolish things that have been used to implicate her.

But frankly I don't think any of us knows how we'd react on finding our room-mate dead in a pool of blood. I suspect many people would panic in that situation.

 

[Gromit]

The law that tries to protect innocent people from being fitted up by shite evidence also sometime protects the guilty from prosecution because the authorities have fucked up (contaminated) the evidence.

What we need is some sort of on the scene armed judge who can dispense instant verdicts and justice.

 

[phildwyer]

Yes Dwyer, we know it goes without saying you are a dick so no need to prove it with your petty posting.
Back on topic, if you really think that that there is not even the slightest possibility Knox is guilty then you are an enormous fool, so much so that even though I know from experience that you are at the very least 'a pompous idiot', I suspect that this is just an exercise in trollisum . Of course there is the slightest of slight chance that she is innocent too, but if you have followed the case (which you quite clearly have not) it seems to err more to the side of certain evidence being unsubmitable due to a technicality, married with reasonable doubt.

 

[phildwyer]

The law that tries to protect innocent people from being fitted up by shite evidence also sometime protects the guilty from prosecution because the authorities have fucked up (contaminated) the evidence.

True. But it is better for a hundred guilty people to go free than for one innocent person to be convicted.

 

[phildwyer]

An italian judge reckons Knox is close to confessing.

Really? Link?

 

[ATOMIC SUPLEX]

The law that tries to protect innocent people from being fitted up by shite evidence also sometime protects the guilty from prosecution because the authorities have fucked up (contaminated) the evidence.

What we need is some sort of on the scene armed judge who can dispense instant verdicts and justice.

 

[belboid]

Well, she's admitted that she panicked after finding the body, and said and did foolish things that have been used to implicate her.

But frankly I don't think any of us knows how we'd react on finding our room-mate dead in a pool of blood. I suspect many people would panic in that situation.

Panic? Yes. Freak out? Absolutely. But clean the house top to bottom, fail to call the police and then pretend you did? Very very peculiar behaviour, even before we get to the attempted framing.

 

[ATOMIC SUPLEX]

I guess I arrived too late. You have already gone from stage one dwyer - denial in the face of an a mass of evidence, to cocking around baby Dwyer 'Hey I was just being crazy funny all along' which is long form Dwyer dickwittery for 'admitting defeat'. Best you'll get I reckon.

 

[phildwyer]

Panic? Yes. Freak out? Absolutely. But clean the house top to bottom, fail to call the police and then pretend you did? Very very peculiar behaviour, even before we get to the attempted framing.

Did they in fact do this though?

I've seen it denied in several places:

"They did not, by the way, show up anywhere with cleaning supplies. That is just another bald-faced lie told by the prosecutor, who made up "facts" on the spur of the moment and presented them as "evidence.""

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/018726.html

 

[ATOMIC SUPLEX]

Oh, no actually there still seems to be quite a lot of denial.

 

[phildwyer]

I guess I arrived too late.

No, you arrived too early. You're not welcome here until the serious discussion is over and done with.

As you've already been told.

Seriously Atomic, can't you stop your obsessive stalking for just a couple of days? It's making you look weird.

 

[ATOMIC SUPLEX]

No, you arrived too early. You're not welcome here until the serious discussion is over and done with.

As you've already been told.

Seriously Atomic, can't you stop your obsessive stalking for just a couple of days? It's making you look weird.

Oh, phil you wag. Do you want me to really re-list your bizarre campaign of stalking and insults?
It's like when you cried because you said I had called you a 'fool' for no reason.

How is replying to one of your threads 'stalking'?
When you were 'replying' to every single one of my threads with childish taunts and insults (personal ban bating jibes that were quite obviously not on topic) that was what exactly?

I don't understand why you do so enjoy looking so completely foolish? Knox is beyond a shadow of a doubt innocent?
Then the ultimate stalker (banned for it several times) accuses a posters actual replies to a thread stalking.

Waka waka waka.

 

[Paulie Tandoori]

I have used the same logic you youself have employed on this thread pathologising on those who you deem to have and have not shown psychopathic tendencys, to show that you could be called scizophrenic because you have changed your mind so quickly.

Of course I don't think you are, but that's because I don't share the same logic as you.

so, a manifestation of schizophrenia is changing one's mind quickly is it?