Orang Utan
Psychick Worrier Ov Geyoor
what are you calling her meredith for? did you know her?
It's your word against the Pathologist. Meredith practiced karate and boxing. Did you know that?
That's true of everyone, I think. If you look at it rationally, without prejudice or preconceptions, you pretty much have to conclude that they were set up by a bonkers prosecutor, who bizarrely got lucky because the salacious media reports favored his crazy theories.
The exceptions are people who for some reason need or at least badly want to believe she's guilty. Mostly misogynists. I've been quite surprised at (some of ) the people who have fallen into this category here.
I find the misogynist link really quite a perplexing conclusion to come to.
Dumb-bell, the evidence that he is a psychopath is that he knifed a woman to death while raping her. Not good enough for you?
It wasn't fake. Just more bullshit from the loony prosecutor and his inept forensic squad. Seriously, take a step back a moment. Think about this without all the fluff and bullshit. Either there was a huge conspiracy as the prosecutor contends, (except now involving persons unknown )or it was, as in most murders, just a mundane and grubby crime much like thousands and thousands of others. One with loose ends and unanswered questions perhaps, but that is probably true of much of life too.Now, Anyone care to explain away the faked break in? Why was it necessary? I'm still waiting for an answer on that not so minor detail.
Wow, you are incredibly certain considering all you have to go in are the reports in the papers. And you clearly havent read them fully. Its rather pathetic, a couple of days ago you were largely convinced of Knox's innocence, but thought there should be a retrial, but as soon as there is a verdict in which allows you to jump on your high horse, off you go!Yeah he did. That's the thing, there is no bizarre conspiracy, no sex games gone wrong, no hidden hands, no occult connections. Just a simple, grubby, all too common, mundane rape and murder case involving the man who has properly been convicted of it, Rudy Guede.
It wasn't fake. Just more bullshit from the loony prosecutor
Bollocks. I have argued that they were innocent from the beginning. Remember my Occams razor analogy. The one you dismissed with such vehement contempt. You are the one with egg on his face matey. You were the one baying for the blood of an innocent couple a few days ago. Its you who should take a long hard look at yourself and your vicious authoritarian instincts. You have been proved totally wrong on this.You accepted the bullshit story of sex orgies gone wrong and even tried to argue that pot can turn people into killers. How you can have the nerve to even show your face on here after your shameful performance is beyond me.Wow, you are incredibly certain considering all you have to go in are the reports in the papers. And you clearly havent read them fully. Its rather pathetic, a couple of days ago you were largely convinced of Knox's innocence, but thought there should be a retrial, but as soon as there is a verdict in which allows you to jump on your high horse, off you go!
Dont try to apply occams razor again, or you'll make a bigger prat of yourself than you did last time. There need be no huge conspiracy for K&S to have been involved, it would have taken just the three of them. Fairly easy. And there is absolutely evidence that the window was broken after the room was tossed. What actual evidence do you have that it was the other way round?It wasn't fake. Just more bullshit from the loony prosecutor and his inept forensic squad. Seriously, take a step back a moment. Think about this without all the fluff and bullshit. Either there was a huge conspiracy as the prosecutor contends, or it was, as in much of life, just a mundane and grubby crime. One with loose ends and unanswered questions perhaps, but that is probably true of much of life too.
you mean the time I was proved absolutely right. That time?Dont try to apply occams razor again, or you'll make a bigger prat of yourself than you did last time.
Bollocks. I have argued that they were innocent from the beginning. Remember my Occams razor analogy. The one you dismissed with such vehement contempt. You are the one with egg on his face matey. You were the one baying for the blood of an innocent couple a few days ago. Its you who should take a long hard look at yourself and your vicious authoritarian instincts
lol, you didnt make an 'occams razor analogy.' You attempted to apply the razor but did so appalingly badly. As you appeared to accept at the time - you only applied the razor to certain, very limited, parts of the evidence, and ignored other elements. When trying to tackle all those elements the razor doesn't work - if only because none of the versions put forward by the various parties really held together.Bollocks. I have argued that they were innocent from the beginning. Remember my Occams razor analogy. The one you dismissed with such vehement contempt. You are the one with egg on his face matey. You were the one baying for the blood of an innocent couple a few days ago. Its you who should take a long hard look at yourself and your vicious authoritarian instincts
Baying!Oh do fuck off with your histrionics. No-one was baying for anyones blood.
No dear, you weren't. Your application was shite. It's like saying 'ha! My stopped clock is perfect cos it got the time precisley right at 12.15 today'you mean the time I was proved absolutely right. That time?
The thing is no ones been proved definitively wrong or right all there is now are more questions, more questions that can be answered by the baying mob to my satisfaction.
It wasn't fake. Just more bullshit from the loony prosecutor and his inept forensic squad. Seriously, take a step back a moment. Think about this without all the fluff and bullshit. Either there was a huge conspiracy as the prosecutor contends, (except now involving persons unknown )or it was, as in most murders, just a mundane and grubby crime much like thousands and thousands of others. One with loose ends and unanswered questions perhaps, but that is probably true of much of life too.
surely the only reasonable position to take here is that no one but those involved know the truth and you'd be foolish to call it either way?
surely the only reasonable position to take here is that no one but those involved know the truth and you'd be foolish to call it either way?
Cba to read the last 20+ pages, but just read the 'aquittal' news and maybe they are actually innocent, but my gut instinct is still 'guilty as sin', but hey. Not that that means very much though, ofc.
So the other student, the African(?) bloke is still in jail then? What a surprise. But the rich white kids who were in it up to their necks have got off...
surely the only reasonable position to take here is that no one but those involved know the truth and you'd be foolish to call it either way?
Lie. If you look at the photos of the crime scene you can see for yourself, draws unopened, nothing missing and glass on top of the clothes strewn about. The police and the flatmate concluded it so, long before the prosecutor became involved in the case.
You can't explain everything away so lazily.
A break-in needn't have to be a trash-the-gaff burglary - there's plenty reasons to break in somewhere and not empty stuff all over the floor in the process. I'm not saying I'm convinced either way, but the faked break-in thing is built on lazy preconceptions and stereotypes. It may be true, fuck knows, but I don't think anyone can be certain either way.
i'm talking about the uninformed public view rather than official investigationsWell you could and you could look at every single murder that way and let everyone kill each other, so long as nobody dares discuss the evidence nothing else matters eh?
Yeah so like someone cleaned up, then they 'broke in', then they forgot that they hadn't actually broken in so they broke in. Only they 'broke in' in a way that was proven impossible.
Doesn't prove it was knox of course but it also doesn't make a lot of sense.