Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Abusive. aggressive employee

why are you so willing to insit they are not.

unless they have some kind of mental problem then orange isn't goign to be the issue is it numb nuts...

He is only being asked to wear a set of overalls provided for his safety and welfare, something which is in his employment, something he has been disciplined for previously. Something he has given a written undertaken to wear. And you believe he is being bullied. FFS:rolleyes:
 
"Your responsibilities
Your most important responsibilities as an employee are:

to take reasonable care of your own health and safety
if possible avoid wearing jewellery or loose clothing if operating machinery
if you have long hair or wear a headscarf, make sure it's tucked out of the way (it could get caught in machinery)
to take reasonable care not to put other people - fellow employees and members of the public - at risk by what you do or don't do in the course of your work
to co-operate with your employer, making sure you get proper training and you understand and follow the company's health and safety policies
not to interfere with or misuse anything that's been provided for your health, safety or welfare"
Personal protective equipment
Your employer must provide personal protective equipment (PPE) to you free of charge. You must use this correctly, and follow the training and instruction you've been given.

In some jobs, failure to use PPE properly can be grounds for disciplinary action or even dismissal. However, you can refuse to wear PPE if it puts your safety at risk (eg PPE of the wrong size could put you at risk because of its poor fit).



Taken from here
 
Go on, meet him half way - do something nice once in your life

Its imparcticable to do this. The quarries, our clients, insist that employees have ornage overalls. No orange overalls, no access to quarry, no contract, no work for men, redundancy, end of company!
 
Its imparcticable to do this. The quarries, our clients, insist that employees have ornage overalls. No orange overalls, no access to quarry, no contract, no work for men, redundancy, end of company!

fire the cunt then
 
He is only being asked to wear a set of overalls provided for his safety and welfare, something which is in his employment, something he has been disciplined for previously. Something he has given a written undertaken to wear. And you believe he is being bullied. FFS:rolleyes:

why though does it bother you so much if you aren't the boss are you hoping for a promotion if he get's fired or summit?

It's none of your, to put it bluntly, fucking business is it if the worker isn't you and you aren't the manager i cannot beleive that anyone would be so dumb as to openly cheer the removeal of a colluege for what is in essence a minor thing which isn't legally manditory.
 
Its imparcticable to do this. The quarries, our clients, insist that employees have ornage overalls. No orange overalls, no access to quarry, no contract, no work for men, redundancy, end of company!

Orange with nice green and blue flowers maybe?
 
Isn't it a legal requirement if it's written into his contract of employment that he has to wear a uniform authorised, chosen and provided by the company?:confused:

No you are not legally bound to wear a uniform. A park keeper would not be breaking the law by not wearing his bottle green tunic. However you do have some legal duties when at work:

From the HSE website

As an employee you have legal duties too. They include:

■ taking reasonable care for your own health and safety and that of others who
may be affected by what you do or do not do;
■ co-operating with your employer on health and safety;
■ correctly using work items provided by your employer, including personal
protective equipment, in accordance with training or instructions; and
■ not interfering with or misusing anything provided for your health, safety
or welfare.​

A Pair of orange overalls is not a uniform it is high vis clobber to stop you being ran over by a great big quarry wagon.
 
why though does it bother you so much if you aren't the boss are you hoping for a promotion if he get's fired or summit?

It's none of your, to put it bluntly, fucking business is it if the worker isn't you and you aren't the manager i cannot beleive that anyone would be so dumb as to openly cheer the removeal of a colluege for what is in essence a minor thing which isn't legally manditory.

Where did I cheer his removal. When did I even mention that he might be removed?:rolleyes:
 
If he refuses to work when you've provided the right equipment then it's fair game that the disciplinary procedure will take its course. No union rep in their right mind would represent someone on the basis that they're being awkward or fussy. is he the only one of many disagreeing though... more info needed.



Yeah, run along you faux left winger.

LOL
 
No you are not legally bound to wear a uniform. A park keeper would not be breaking the law by not wearing his bottle green tunic. However you do have some legal duties when at work:

Health & Safety aside, in many jobs you have to wear a uniform.

Surely if this was made clear to you when you took the job, you have to wear the uniform?

I remember working in shops and stuff where you had to wear their uniform.

I mean, could a policeman just turn up in jeans and a t-shirt and say "I'm not wearing that uniform, especially that hat that looks like a big tit on my head" without getting into trouble?

Giles..
 
why though does it bother you so much if you aren't the boss are you hoping for a promotion if he get's fired or summit?

It's none of your, to put it bluntly, fucking business is it if the worker isn't you and you aren't the manager i cannot beleive that anyone would be so dumb as to openly cheer the removeal of a colluege for what is in essence a minor thing which isn't legally manditory.

It is an offence worthy of gross misconduct to refuse to work on the basis that PPE isn't the right colour [to suit your personal taste]. Speaking as a real trades unionist here as opposed to just a manager hater, no union rep in their right mind would defend this guy over the facts that have been given.

Employment laws work both ways. 'Awkwardness' from individual employees does damage to unions as they try to fight just causes for the good of all of the members rather than piss about with individual folk who have an axe to grind.
 
Back
Top Bottom