And in the worse case scenario you could be prosecuted for refusing to hand the information over - especially under s55 of the DPA for personal data. That would be a rare step though, as most people wouldn't dig their heels in to that extent.Not if it's company owned information such a business strategy or other confidential information especially any information covered by the data protection act.
I completely agree - you need to maintain that line for sake of your health and sanity. There's been some interesting developments in Europe about contacting employees out of hours, with some companies switching off their blackberry mail servers at a set time each day so employees can't deal with work in the evenings, and various other restrictions like auto-deletion of e-mails where a person is on leave.The most worrying aspect is the blurring of the boundary between work and recreational time (and sleep time). This fucks up mental health in the most insidious and damaging way. Evil.
I agree with the worry, but this is probably a bit extreme. *You* are still in control of when you do and do not engage with emails and calls outside of working hours.The most worrying aspect is the blurring of the boundary between work and recreational time (and sleep time). This fucks up mental health in the most insidious and damaging way. Evil.
In many ways, a bring your own device policy could be a short term fix leading to long term problems.The last company I worked for, decided to use Groupon as advertisement for certain services and get people in the store. As we were a small company (including the two owners, there were 10 people working there) everyone had a smart device.
So the day came when the owners wanted the staff to download the Groupon Merchant app on their personal phone. Everyone but me downloaded it. I said there's no way I'm using my personal mobile for his benefit. If he wanted me to scan people's coupon, he'd need to provide a scanner. That answer didn't fly and he got really upset, really quickly.
Like, how can I refuse him and use my personal device for his decision? I stuck to my answers until he told me I'd have to find one of the other employee's mobiles in order to adequately do my job. Which I thought was one of the most craziest things I've heard - interrupt one of the workers to say "can I borrow your phone? I need to scan a Groupon" and then continue on in my day. Wasteful thinking, IMO.
I don't agree with employers making employees use their personal devices for business gain what so ever. If my employer wants to foot my bill (any part of it - however you break it down), then I'd think about it. But honestly, I wouldn't do it. I'd rather be let go.
I've got a standard crappy work blackberry which they can nuke remotely if need be. I don't think it's possible to selectively erase data though, although it's a pretty dumb smartphone given how locked down it is.At the place I'm at now, we supply phones for almost all people but if someone wants to use their own phone that's fine too, it basically saves us £30 a month so we aren't going to complain.
We have recently brought in software that will enable us to track phones, disable and delete data remotely etc, as we deal with sensitive information so need to have that ability.
If someone is using their own phone by choice and doesn't allow us to use that software, they are then have to use a work phone.
Tbh, we can't ever stop them accessing their work emails from their personal phone anyway, even if they have a work phone. So it's all slightly fucked anyway.
Ah yeah, didn't think of that. It sounds dodgy from a security point of view though, but I suppose there must be ways of protecting the mail server and the wider network beyond that from whatever crap is in the employee's computer or phone.Remote desktop probably.
What you haven't said here is why specifically you didn't want to download the Groupon app. What harm/difficulty might it have caused you (if indeed that is the reason) - or is it merely a principle thing. I'm not being critical, just interested.The last company I worked for, decided to use Groupon as advertisement for certain services and get people in the store. As we were a small company (including the two owners, there were 10 people working there) everyone had a smart device.
So the day came when the owners wanted the staff to download the Groupon Merchant app on their personal phone. Everyone but me downloaded it. I said there's no way I'm using my personal mobile for his benefit. If he wanted me to scan people's coupon, he'd need to provide a scanner. That answer didn't fly and he got really upset, really quickly.
Like, how can I refuse him and use my personal device for his decision? I stuck to my answers until he told me I'd have to find one of the other employee's mobiles in order to adequately do my job. Which I thought was one of the most craziest things I've heard - interrupt one of the workers to say "can I borrow your phone? I need to scan a Groupon" and then continue on in my day. Wasteful thinking, IMO.
I don't agree with employers making employees use their personal devices for business gain what so ever. If my employer wants to foot my bill (any part of it - however you break it down), then I'd think about it. But honestly, I wouldn't do it. I'd rather be let go.
It's pretty common, even in companies that pay more attention than most to security. There's normally an antivirus at the exchange level and at the local domain machine level as well. A compromise on a BYOD that just has email and lync is not insignificant, especially from a social engineering point of view, but it's not letting you upload viruses onto alien motherships either (Independence day, great film).Ah yeah, didn't think of that. It sounds dodgy from a security point of view though, but I suppose there must be ways of protecting the mail server and the wider network beyond that from whatever crap is in the employee's computer or phone.
What you haven't said here is why specifically you didn't want to download the Groupon app. What harm/difficulty might it have caused you (if indeed that is the reason) - or is it merely a principle thing. I'm not being critical, just interested.