Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

A thank you to Brexiteers.

A simple google on ‘British ‘ brands , untilities and a number of landmark assets gives a frightening indication of foreign ownership in the U.K. decades before Brexit or this government.


Apparently that is embarrassing. Not quite sure what mindset you need to give a flying fuck, let alone feel actual embarrassment over such a thing.
 
Lol. Point out that another nation or the EU has got something right and it’s credit where it’s due. Do the same with the U.K. and it’s Land of Hope and Glory flag waving!
Come off it, this is a jingoistic caricature:

The entire UK procurement strategy with AstraZeneca has been professionally managed and invested in, with contracts locked-down in English law; whilst the EU's has been half-arsed, unprofessional, and contracted in wishy-washy Belgian law.

Whatever may or may not have gone on, it's not to do with EU civil servants turning up to work unshaven, and still less about the superiority of the English legal tradition.

It's pretty obvious that the UK has out-smarted/out-arseholed (it's as broad as long) the EU wrt to AZ procurement. There's no need to recount that. Probably annoying and embarrassing for EU, but it's also a storm in a teacup, because there's neither the UK or the EU are likely to run into a shortage of the vaccine at any point (the difference for EU countries is slower distribution, not supply).

No-one ought to be banning vaccine exports, and for the EU to be talking about it is unnecessary and a (possibly deliberate) distraction.

However, to be crowing about the predictable wickedness and incompetence of the EU's proposed ban on the one hand while, on the other, celebrating the genius of the UK doing it first (which it did - the fact that exports may be allowed a some distant point in the future doesn't make it not a ban) is ridiculous, and it most definitely is buying into a flag-waving narrative.
 
Come off it, this is a jingoistic caricature:



Whatever may or may not have gone on, it's not to do with EU civil servants turning up to work unshaven, and still less about the superiority of the English legal tradition.

It's pretty obvious that the UK has out-smarted/out-arseholed (it's as broad as long) the EU wet to AZ procurement. There's no need to recount that. Probably annoying and embarrassing for EU, but it's also a storm in a teacup, because there's neither the UK or the EU are likely to run into a shortage of the vaccine at any point (the difference for EU countries is slower distribution, not supply).

No-one ought to be banning vaccine exports, and for the EU to be talking about it is unnecessary and a (possibly deliberate) distraction.

However, to be crowing about the predictable wickedness and incompetence of the EU's proposed ban on the one hand while, on the other, celebrating the genius of the UK doing it first (which it did - the fact that exports may be allowed a some distant point in the future doesn't make it not a ban) is ridiculous, and it most definitely is buying into a flag-waving narrative.
the idea of Spymaster climbing into bed with boris johnson is a mental image no one desires
 
However, to be crowing about the predictable wickedness and incompetence of the EU's proposed ban on the one hand while, on the other, celebrating the genius of the UK doing it first (which it did - the fact that exports may be allowed a some distant point in the future doesn't make it not a ban) is ridiculous, and it most definitely is buying into a flag-waving narrative.

Sorry but this is just absolute nonsense as already explained in detail. You'll get a few likes from others who are similarly stranded though :thumbs:

Ask yourself this; what is your motivation in insisting on calling the contractual commitment an export ban? Why are you so keen to characterize it as such?

No need to answer really ;)
 
In the minds of morons, yes.

That was explicit in the marketing and to say otherwise is rewriting history.

I don’t ever deny there were legit reasons for voting leave but when your marketing is set on blaming immigrants, the Eu and has Take Back Control as a key marketing pledge a pattern emerges.

Loads of UK farmers and landowners got fortunes in set aside payments from the EU. Something I am glad has ended post brexit.

Yes but plenty of poorer farmers exist. We shall see what happens with the subsidys
 
That was explicit in the marketing and to say otherwise is rewriting history.

I don’t ever deny there were legit reasons for voting leave but when your marketing is set on blaming immigrants, the Eu and has Take Back Control as a key marketing pledge a pattern emerges.



Yes but plenty of poorer farmers exist. We shall see what happens with the subsidys
You claimed farmers are universally shafted. It’s not the case.
 
My understanding is that ‘Take back control’ related to a trading bloc and set of economic arrangements and political treaties and not a country or people.
I think that, since the referendum, the accepted mantra from the right party of capital has been Britain would take back full control of our money, our borders and our laws.
 
You claimed farmers are universally shafted. It’s not the case.

It depends how we define farmers. Prince Charles owns farms but he’s not a farmer. Same for so many of the larger landowners.


They like to pretend to be horny handed sons of the soil but it’s the tenants on their land doing the work. Meanwhile the supermarkets are busy fucking over smaller farmers and paying peanuts
 
Back
Top Bottom