911cultists--your card is marked, big-time

[Larry O'Hara]

So my questions are weird and rhetorical?

Why where the hi-jacked planes not intercepted by the airforce?What caused WTC 7 to collapse?

Why is it that Fema discusses the one and Norad the other then? It is just that they do not do so in depth, (building 7), or they contradict at different times ( no interceptions).

That your questions are rhetorical is exemplified by your repeating them, when I have directed you to answers.

 

[editor]

Editor:

'Have you bothered yourself to consult any credible independent research from credible sources, or are you only here to ask the same old 'questions' that have been asked - and answered - endlessly in a plethora of threads?'

The short anwer is: no!

Highly qualified experts have looked into the collapse of WTC7.

None of them support the various fruitloop theories, so repeating ill-researched questions looks to be a bit of a waste of time.

Maybe that's why no one's bothering to get involved in this thread.

 

[EddyBlack]

Editor:

I only pointed out that the official account does not discuss it (911 Comission Report) and that the FEMA report says that the reasons remain unknown.

I didn't propose any 'fruitloop theories', I just pointed out the unanswered questions. It is a pretty large one after all.

No doubt you and Larry believe this question is all answered, because 'qualified experts' have commented on this.

Why then do the official reports I cite, which were published years after 911, still not answer it.

I don't propose to be able to answer it myself or to have followed every piece of information about it. I was just pointing out the obvious.

 

[Larry O'Hara]

Editor:

I didn't propose any 'fruitloop theories', I just pointed out the unanswered questions. It is a pretty large one after all.

No doubt you and Larry believe this question is all answered, because 'qualified experts' have commented on this.
.

Maybe you have an aversion to Arabic numerals, and prefer Roman? Using Arabic numerals, the book I directed to you referred to '5 unanswered questions about 9/11'. The Arabic system goes thus: 1, 2, 3, 4, & then 5.
Or if you prefer, I, II, III, IV and then V. Using dots: ., .., ..., ...., .....
Do you understand? The bottom line is, you would far rather jerk off using your keyboard than do any actual research--I myself, as I have stated earlier, will be (and are) looking into 9/11, but because I am not a monomaniac, and refused to have my research priorities determined by fruitloops, am looking at it in my own time, at my own pace, and in my own way. Why don't you, 'truth-seeker' visit the www.911cult.org.uk web-site & read the article on Machon Shayler & the 9/11 Truth Movement and give us your considered views and refutation--if you do that, you will be the first 9/11 cultist to do so, rather than evade the issues. Or is it that you types can only ask (rhetorical) questions, but never answer them?