Some way to go yet, I'm afraid... this is pretty fair for a 9-11 thread, thoughMikeMcc said:By the way - what's the record for a thread length on Urban?
So., what was the conclusion of your Birmingham 'investigation' and will you finally explain - in detail - your new theory about Flight 93, please?Jazzz said:Some way to go yet, I'm afraid... this is pretty fair for a 9-11 thread, though
Donna Ferentes said:That's got not anything at all to do with what I said. The point is that the Truth Seekers are never able to come up with anything even remotely resembling an account of what they think actually happened. Who did what and when, having been instructed to do so by whom. That sort of thing.
editor said:Hold on.
You are aware that a host of posters think that you've been given some kind of extraordinary licence here because of your disruptive, evasive, troll-like conduct?
Why only last week at least two posters were asking why on earth you hadn't been banned yet.
MikeMcc said:After all the claims and counter-claims I believe the biggest flaw in all of the conspiracy theories is that the conspiracies would have to be so large. People, by their nature, tend to brag. The fact that no believeable stories have surfaced on how 'so and so was involved in 9-11' given the size of the conspiracy required, across such a wide breadth of society, suggests that the portraryed scenario was correct.
fela fan said:Capital letters for the truth seekers eh? Interesting sub-conscious rhetorical device. Part, of course, of an attempted program of ridiculing the messenger and ignoring the message. Politics instead of debate.
But in any case people looking for the truth would be most unlikely to already have it, otherwise why would they be looking for it?
Whereas those that know already have no need to keep their minds open.
And anyway, your post stinks of the american way of closing their minds: if you can't offer an alternative version, then you cannot attack any other version.
100% pompous drivel.fela fan said:Capital letters for the truth seekers eh? Interesting sub-conscious rhetorical device. Part, of course, of an attempted program of ridiculing the messenger and ignoring the message. Politics instead of debate.
But in any case people looking for the truth would be most unlikely to already have it, otherwise why would they be looking for it?
Whereas those that know already have no need to keep their minds open.
And anyway, your post stinks of the american way of closing their minds: if you can't offer an alternative version, then you cannot attack any other version.
fela fan said:pk is a loudmouth verbally violent and impolite pig intent on doing his best to ridicule people.
Techno303 said:What exactly are you dribbling on about here?
editor said:100% pompous drivel.
fela fan said:Well, not surprising you'd recognise such stuff.
No, it was entirely conscious.fela fan said:Capital letters for the truth seekers eh? Interesting sub-conscious rhetorical device.
What message? What debate?fela fan said:Part, of course, of an attempted program of ridiculing the messenger and ignoring the message. Politics instead of debate.
I have read this sentence several times and am still at a loss as to what it's supposed to mean....fela fan said:And anyway, your post stinks of the american way of closing their minds: if you can't offer an alternative version, then you cannot attack any other version.
pk said:All this I could dismiss as just the ramblings of a lunatic, but two things I find offensive:
pk said:Just a shit-stirrer, ain't ya Fela?
No more no less...
Donna Ferentes said:No, it was entirely conscious.
What message? What debate?
I have read this sentence several times and am still at a loss as to what it's supposed to mean....
Woooargh! Feel the width of the all-sweeping generalisation from the enlightened one!fela fan said:I just think people are too serious in britain.
That doesn't make any sense either.fela fan said:Well, not surprising you'd recognise such stuff.
My command of English is really more than adequate, as it goes: it was the logic that defeated me.fela fan said:Well, stay at a loss then, coz i really ain't gonna be bothered explaining it. It's really quite simple, and if you've got problems with the english language then sort yourself out eh.
fela fan said:I like reading jazzz on this website.
I have a go at you, but to be honest life is too short to get het up about it. I just feel for your own sake you'd be better off being less angry/violent.
pk said:I'm not het-up or violent... that's your flawed interpretation.
Donna Ferentes said:My command of English is really more than adequate, as it goes: it was the logic that defeated me.
editor said:Woooargh! Feel the width of the all-sweeping generalisation from the enlightened one!
Once again, your comment is utterly meaningless.fela fan said:Good to see you recognising things for what they are for once...
How could 'logic' be influenced by Buddhism?fela fan said:My logic has had 15 years of eastern and buddhist influence, so excuse me if i'm off target.
editor said:Once again, your comment is utterly meaningless.
Can't you keep your bullshit bon mots to yourself please?
editor said:How could 'logic' be influenced by Buddhism?