Once again someone has to remind this lying cock of a few basic facts...
Jazzz said:
Yet in none of those are the possibility that there may have been demolition charges/bombs considered at all! Rather, the conclusion is simply assumed - that the towers came down thanks to the plane impacts and resulting fires. So we have blazing infernos where none existed etc.
And in none of these FACTS are the assumption that Bugs Bunny was personally involved either.
Damn - they overlooked that one! What's up Doc?
Simple tests - which should have been carried out in any proper analysis, such as testing the steel for 'twinning' - would determine whether the steel was exploded or otherwise. However the function of the investigation has not been to consider all possibilities, but rather seize the evidence and make sure that the crucial tests weren't done. This should ring massive alarm bells that all is not right.
This is another lie, presumably serving to back up the antisemitic theories from which these tales of fantasy and conspiracy are derived.
My personal view is that - whatever could have happened to the rest of the towers - the collapse of the huge central steels proves that they were blown up. They were extraordinarily thick. The planes would have little damaged them (huge thick steel columns trump aluminium debris). Conducting heat beatifully down a massive heat sink they would have been cool to touch. They couldn't 'pancake' collapse. Even if the rest of the tower failed no way could it bring down the central steel. In short, they couldn't collapse, yet ended up in tiny pieces all the way down. They had to have been blown up.
They HAD to have been blown up did they?
Must have been that magic explosive that doesn't send fragments throughout the building's exterior then, because clearly - TO ANYONE WHO ACTUALLY WATCHED THE TOWERS COLLAPSE - there was structural failure at the point of the plane's impact, then the buildings, having been burning aviation fuel for a considerable amount of time, collapsed from the top down, they didn't explode, nor were they blown up.
I'm tired of your endless finger-in-ears action in the face of logical supposition and proven evidence, and again - these threads do far better when you are not here repeating stuff that has already been blown out of the water.
No amount of your anti-semitic website bullshit is going to convince anyone of anything other than your own gullibility.
And this thread is typical of the reasons why 9/11 threads are just a magnet for disturbed clueless paranoid little boys who want to play amateur detective.
I'd have binned it the first time you posted on it, if it were up to me...