Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

14th November Movement for Left Unity

Last edited:
I wonder if he will be allowed to talk about it from the stage at the Labour, sorry TUC Rally, for better wages in October?
 
Mr McCluskey implied that a newly formed Workers’ Party would then join the Liberal Democrats and others in campaigning for MPs to be elected under a system of proportional representation (PR), to give the new party a better chance of gaining a toehold in Parliament.
“I’ve always taken the traditional position of being opposed to PR,” Mr McCluskey said. “That’s because I thought that Labour would never get into power [under PR] and we’d never get a socialist Valhalla.
“I’ve given up on my socialist Valhalla, so I’m now rethinking my position on PR. If a new party emerged, a new Workers’ Party, then you may well find that I’m in favour of PR.”

Whats wrong with that?, log jam maybe finally breaking up, PR is a prequisite for advancement of progressive parties, though it could also mean UKIP, even an EDL type party getting seats.
 
Nice of the lord to provide.

And yes, we are now on the verge of PR - the log-jam is breaking. After all, there was that very successful AV referendum to build on.

Jesus, haven't you already enough straws to grasp that you need to shove PR in thee too?
 
reform of the electoral system remains critical if there's ever going to be any movement beyond Labourism on the British left. Remains the case. Problem is it's an empty threat, when there was a chance to stand up to Miliband he backed down.
 
Every single Western European democracy that operates PR has essentially the same political patterns as the UK, alternating between centre left and centre right governments. For instance, all post-WW2 elected German Chancellors have been SPD or CDU
 
reform of the electoral system remains critical if there's ever going to be any movement beyond Labourism on the British left. Remains the case. Problem is it's an empty threat, when there was a chance to stand up to Miliband he backed down.
No it's not. PR is the opium of the lib-dem-labour-lefty-think-tank-researcher class.
 
Every single Western European democracy that operates PR has essentially the same political patterns as the UK, alternating between centre left and centre right governments. For instance, all post-WW2 elected German Chancellors have been SPD or CDU
there isn't a total vacuum in quite the same way - at last you have European left parties like Die Linke in countries with better electoral systems
 
there isn't a total vacuum in quite the same way - at last you have European left parties like Die Linke in countries with better electoral systems
There is, it just functions in a different way. In Germany governments have been formed and policies made by the same parties of centre left and centre right for about 70 years now. I could point to pretty similar patterns in Italy, Spain, Portugal, Austria and Belgium, with slight national variations.
 
Can you explain how a progressive left party could get a substantial vote in a general election with FPTP?
It won't get a substantial vote in a general election with PR or FPTP. Can you explain to me why i have to explain this to you? Or, failing that (as if you would not answer a question!) tell me why PR might help a a progressive left party get a substantial vote in a general election please. And one more, what won't you join left-unity?
 
they have some socialist TDs and MEPs at least - doing better than we are
What evidence have you got that political representation for left-wingers in parliament improves ... well... anything? (There's at least as many socialists in the House of Commons btw, just not independent ones)
 
With what result? Are greek workers happy now? Are the german workers screwed to the floor happy? What result?
as i said, not sufficient... but would either want to swap for our system? I doubt it. Historically majoritarian systems have been supported by people like Mussolini's fascists or the orangmen in Ulster who have sought to manipulate popular representation to suppress any challenge from the left.
 
What evidence have you got that political representation for left-wingers in parliament improves ... well... anything? (There's at least as many socialists in the House of Commons btw, just not independent ones)
Nye Bevan achieved a thing or two
 
as i said, not sufficient... but would either want to swap for our system? I doubt it. Historically majoritarian systems have been supported by people like Mussolini's fascists or the orangmen in Ulster who have sought to manipulate popular representation to suppress any challenge from the left.
Is not sufficient a synonym for being shit? And here we go - if you don't share the lib-dem-labour-lefty-think-tank-researcher class' obsession then you're almost a fascist. Hey, you get your PR and the w/c get what? Weasel politician.

And btw, if the other element of your not-sufficient scenario was present then it wouldn't matter at all if we had PR or FPTP or +1 or anything.

Oh yeah, this, if you're not with us then you're a fascist stuff is why you were so embarrassingly trounced in the AV vote. Isolated, cut off bubble shit.
 
as i said, not sufficient... but would either want to swap for our system? I doubt it. Historically majoritarian systems have been supported by people like Mussolini's fascists or the orangmen in Ulster who have sought to manipulate popular representation to suppress any challenge from the left.

A proportional system didn't stop the election of a far-right government in the Second Spanish Republic or the Weimar Republic.
 
A proportional system didn't stop the election of a far-right government in the Second Spanish Republic or the Weimar Republic.
where did I say it was some kind of magic formula for success ( btw if Weimar had a FPTP system the Nazis could have come to power a couple of years ealier)
 
Back
Top Bottom