butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Read the thing quoted above. We've already agreed but lee is special so let's quietly change it.
he doesn't want to stand internally tho - too much like hard work. he justs wants to stand for councilwho said that?
isnt it too late now any way? internal elections have closed last week, and the democratic structures make it impossible to just fly in a candidate without members voting them in.
depends who said it thoughRead the thing quoted above. We've already agreed but lee is special so let's quietly change it.
Who has authority to send round stuff like that?depends who said it though
i'll wait to get more context , but it sounds like it was sent around the lambeth local branch. ive no idea who is in that or what size it is, but a lot of the local branches are small groups of people, none of whom necessarily have any authority other than as memebrsWho has authority to send round stuff like that?
Whoever sent it is doing a bit more than just circulating info.i'll wait to get more context , but it sounds like it was sent around the lambeth local branch. ive no idea who is in that or what size it is, but a lot of the local branches are small groups of people, none of whom necessarily have any authority other than as memebrs
Thanks, ive read it more carefully nowhe doesn't want to stand internally tho - too much like hard work. he justs wants to stand for council
you're not enjoying this are you?You'll have a candidate and no credibility very soon.
who said that?
isnt it too late now any way? internal elections have closed last week, and the democratic structures make it impossible to just fly in a candidate without members voting them in.
According to the WW and Pete McLaren reports numbers of branch reps showing up to national steering committee meetings are rapidly falling, while some detached from reality types are blathering about needing 5,000 members by the end of the year.
Mid-sized left sect thinking its a mass party = recipe for disaster
that's what they said, but they would, wouldn't they? I suspect they were an awful lot of existing far-lefties who joined just in time to vote in the conference.175 people joined yesterday after the new Loach article, most joining now are basically old labour supporters who can't stomach the LP anymore, especially after the welfare cap vote, its not a traditional sect
Why haven't you joined treelover?
Why haven't you joined?I want left groups to be successful, doesn't mean you have to join them, very cautious after experiences.
it wont pass, will it?what about the 'arming the people' motion
not too radical?
175 people joined yesterday after the new Loach article, most joining now are basically old labour supporters who can't stomach the LP anymore, especially after the welfare cap vote, its not a traditional sect and I don't think the new members are 'wreckers'
and I'm not a member.
I see they are attracting the youth.
Lots of people at the conference.
200 in attendance, apparently.
I see they are attracting the youth.