JOHN NOBLE YES.
Indeed. In fact, during what I think was the-tardis-is-a-hot-woman-what-a-surprise episode, didn't Tennant talk about the time lord who would had regenerated into male and female at various times?
Anyone who is so adamant that the time lord cannot ever be a woman should sit back and think about WHAT A MASSIVE FUCKING DICKHEAD THEY ARE BEING.
Rutger Hauer
He's seen things you people would't believe.
Fabulous. Sexist troll of the day.Look its Doctor Who not... um whats the female version of Doctor? Oh yeah, nurse... not Nurse Who.
christ. even taking the piss, that's pretty pathetic.Look its Doctor Who not... um whats the female version of Doctor? Oh yeah, nurse... not Nurse Who.
Ben Kingsley, reprising his shtick from Iron Man 3 (no spoilers now folks!)
surely gromits joke is a feminist one?
everything is pointing towards cunt-laden polemics tbf. would certainly renew my interest in the show.far better that he reprise his role from Sexy Beast and cows the sontarans with a blistering assault of cunt-laden polemic
obviously there are women doctors, what is absurd is the idea that the female equivalent of a doctor is a nurse and more importantly that someone would express that as an opinion. it made me laugh.Not any way I can parse it it's not.
Or Claypole, even better.
You want to get LDR back from New Zealand to do it?
Who's LDR? I want Michael Staniforth to do it. The production team can use the Tardis to travel back pre-87 for filming.
Sweet Eris, nooooooooooo!jimmy krankie.
But I really do not want the Doctor to so dramatically change persona by flipping to a female persona
you've fundamentally misunderstood the archetype that Who represents. Its the gifted trickster, the shaman-clown.Not really gendered at all.
So a female regeneration would inherently be a more 'dramatic' switch than that from Ecclestone to Tennant, for example? Can you explain how/why?
Its like enigmatic, ruthless and yet charming and powerful figures cannot possibly be cloven of crotch because thats the way things work