to our minds yeah, but she palmed off the biggest errors on other people (coach company said we'd arrive 2 hours later, the employee on the bus should not have let it go) whilst accepting that it was their (though not her) mistake and "logistical errors" and that lessons were learnt and wouldn't be repeated.
She painted the complainants as a couple of troublemakers who chose to camp outside in the rain rather than be in under cover accomodation because the accomodation was communal and that they knew that before they agreed to go, and that there were over 200 people there and no-one else complained
No challenge asking whether communal accomodation was suitable at all from the presenter, who'd earlier stated that going was voluntary.
He also didn't press her on the changing facilities, she first said they were supposed to change on the coach but then said they were supposed to change on minibuses that were bringing their kit, but didn't explain why they didn't get changed on the minibuses.
I think a lot of people will come away from hearing that thinking that it was bad and everything but it's not as bad as it's being made out and it's just a couple of troublemakers.
Hopefully more people will come forward, and if she told any outright lies then perhaps others will speak up to expose them.
Poking around on companies house seems to suggest that both the security company and the training company have nearly been struck off twice each. I assume it was down to a failure to file the right paperwork, but unlike the other companies she had that are dissolved, they sorted out the paperwork in the end.
Molly Prince seems to be known as Mary Prince or Mary Jane Prince on many of the company records. She's setup a couple more limited companies this year, as Molly Prince, with the same address as the security company. They are called Vision Lifestyle Ltd and Commitment Fitness Ltd, with little sign of them having done anything yet.
Channel 4 News interviewing one of the stewards in tonights edition.
Elbows, how do you check companies house? There's a dispute I'm supporting at the minute and the company concerned is one of these "charities" that uses ex-prisoners and I've been told that this Molly Prince is involved in a "charity" that's in exactly the same line of work and sounds like it might be the same one. Would be very useful if we could find out if it is. Or if you're feeling kind enough to check for me (doesn't hurt to ask eh? ) I'll PM the details - don't want to say anything on a public forum cos it's pretty sensitive at the minute.
No time to go into the boring details of these searches right now, but there are quite narrow limits as to what can be searched for, especially without paying, and charities are a bit different so don't get your hopes up too much.
But I do love sniffing the net for info from a variety of sources, and it would make me feel better to discover something of some use, so please do send me the details and I'll look into it swiftly.
Only just seen this, sorry. Cheers mate, I'll send you a PM when I get home, might be tomorrow morning if that's ok.
Thanks to laptop too.
you may also get the info from www.bizzy.co.uk or from www.companiesintheuk.co.ukElbows, how do you check companies house? There's a dispute I'm supporting at the minute and the company concerned is one of these "charities" that uses ex-prisoners and I've been told that this Molly Prince is involved in a "charity" that's in exactly the same line of work and sounds like it might be the same one. Would be very useful if we could find out if it is. Or if you're feeling kind enough to check for me (doesn't hurt to ask eh? ) I'll PM the details - don't want to say anything on a public forum cos it's pretty sensitive at the minute.
Thanks for the link, I think quite a few urbanites will be helped by the information there.I saw this somewhere http://www.consent.me.uk/ sorry if its already been posted
that is really good fair playI saw this somewhere http://www.consent.me.uk/ sorry if its already been posted
the Channel 4 story...makes it look only 30 people where affected.
the Channel 4 story...makes it look only 30 people where affected.
The Telegraph is rushing to the defence. Interestingly, they use a line that I used in my email to the minister.