There's no link at all, is there, between the German Spartacists of 1918-19, who later became the German Communist Party and the Trotskyist group calling itself Spartacist?
Beautiful. Good idea to have one grammatical error in all PD stuff as well.
have you heard the whole "workers hammer and workers anvil" story?
the workers and the bomb are one; the workers and the bomb are united!
a worker-bomber synthesis demonstrates a crux of clear revolutionary moment, one of brutal strength inseparably bound to the whirring sounds of industrial freedom. we must usher in this moment of reckoning -- the smashing of the class enemy through the final blow of the workers' hammer, ushered forward gloriously by the pure song of irradiation; the wrecking of the parasitic milieux upon the pure steel of the workers' anvil!
Bad news. He just said on twitter that his cousin Sandra MacLeod is missing.Betrayed!
you just can't trust these arty types!
dotty:
Ken mcloed! fucking legend. not that his great body of work will spare him come the day
I believe 39thstep used to live with him.
If _angel_'s bloke was around now he would say something like "Jimmy Saville farted in the same lift as me mam in 1983" now
I think you will find that there will be 1.25DH Compañeras.Workers Girder will have its own 3am girls probably.
"Mushroom" McLeod
Fantastic reply there from Ken "Mushroom" McLeod. Has he put it on his blog?
Fantastic reply there from Ken "Mushroom" McLeod. Has he put it on his blog?
@ProletarianDem said:@amendlocke Very glad that Sandra is safe. We will overlook your slanderous response to our comradely approach.
@amendlocke said:@ProletarianDem Well, you're welcome to publish it on your blog and refute it if you can!
I steal everything. Everything. I even nicked that line off Stalin and 'reloaded' it.Studied modesty. Like Stalin's.
Does anyone know anything about this group?
http://anticapitalists.org/about-us
Their 'about us' doesn't reveal very much.
X has told Y to be careful of them, because they try to affiliate groups to them.
I think they did that Up the Anti thing a while back, so have they left behind a Trotskyist model?
Back to bolshevism - but this time, no screw ups!Does anyone know anything about this group?
http://anticapitalists.org/about-us
Their 'about us' doesn't reveal very much.
X has told Y to be careful of them, because they try to affiliate groups to them.
I think they did that Up the Anti thing a while back, so have they left behind a Trotskyist model?
I looked at the website and was a bit about it.
We came to the conclusion that a method of organising exclusively focused on building specifically Leninist-Trotskyist groups prevents the socialist left from creating the kind of broad anticapitalist organisations, which can present a credible alternative to the mainstream parties.
The post 1991 world presents new challenges to the left and the workers’ movement. Marxism is no longer the natural ‘go-to politics’ of radical activists coming into the movement today. The dramatic shift to the right by social democracy and the business unionism of the trade union movement all took their toll on the capacity of the workers to fight. Now the task of regenerating a movement that can overthrow capitalism is serious one, but in a sense the left has barely begun this task.
As a step forward, in recent months we launched a call for a new anticapitalist initiative in Britain as a way of uniting sections of the left around a strategic perspective whilst emphasising the creation of a democratic space that is so urgently needed to debate and test out our slogans and tactics. We did not want to simply declare a new organisation, but to carry out patient and serious discussions with broader forces about what such an organisation should look like.
We launched this initiative whilst we were in Workers Power, and although there was agreement that such an organisation was needed, there was growing disagreement on the role of groups like Workers Power within it. This boiled down to whether we saw it as a tactic to achieve a larger Workers Power, or whether the anticapitalist organisation that came out of it would look very different; more plural, more open, much looser, but still clear on the strategic questions.
As part of this perspective we drew the conclusion that there needed to be an open, ‘blue skies’ discussion on the radical left, involving matters of theory and history, drawing on the new as well as the old, but trying to come to practical conclusions on how we might go forward today. So, we increasingly rejected the model of democratic centralism that states revolutionary organisations should conduct their debates in private and only present their conclusions to the class. While, we don’t reject democratic centralism, our conception of it is unity in action around democratically determined goals, and free and open discussion. We showed in the course of the debate that this was the norm in the revolutionary movement in the decades prior to 1917.