fredfelt
Mostly unknown member
Not sure how it's different to vans on the public highway with adverts on the side conducting commercial operations.
To me there's a clear difference between a public highway and a town square.
Not sure how it's different to vans on the public highway with adverts on the side conducting commercial operations.
the bye-laws clearly state:
and i would say the advertising is offering to provide a service.
always start with the bye-lawsOh well I didn't know about any by-laws. My comparison remains valid for public space not subject to such by-laws
Private vehicle v public space.
always start with the bye-laws
See post 31I am sure their advert display is privately owned, and roads are public space.
Of course there is.To me there's a clear difference between a public highway and a town square.
You may find that English common law does not quite agree.To me there's a clear difference between a public highway and a town square.
so in answer to your op, you should contact the council and complain about this organisation's use of the square under sections 38 & 40 of the bye-laws.Of course there is.
i can't get the staff at all being as i don't get involved with recruitment - above my pay grade, don't you know.You can't get the staff these days.
editor isn't an anarchist and i proposed a course of action i believe appropriate to his beliefs.So we are upset that some millennials in leotards are ignoring local by laws and propose some anarchist behavior to bring them back into line.
Is irony still cool?
You may find that English common law does not quite agree.
It seems a bit funny to want to sit and passively observe the world go by; and then complain that it's the wrong kind of world as it does.English common law has little influence on me when I pick a spot to sit, chill, have my sandwiches and watch the world go by.
As for shouty people in Lycra, that would have a direct influence.
Er, what?and it's not as if editor has ever made any money from doing stuff in windrush square
it's not the wrong sort of world passing by, it's the wrong sort of world stopping, setting up advertising hoardings and forcing some sort of performance on people in a space in which such activities are prohibited.It seems a bit funny to want to sit and passively observe the world go by; and then complain that it's the wrong kind of world as it does.
It's really about whether people think it's OK for commercial enterprises to reserve space for themselves in public squares for private gain. I don't think it is, but no doubt some of the more Thatcherite posters here will applaud such 'entrepreneurship' because in their world, it's always 'profit first'.it's not the wrong sort of world passing by, it's the wrong sort of world stopping, setting up advertising hoardings and forcing some sort of performance on people in a space in which such activities are prohibited.
Surely anyone could just rock up with a yoga mat and join in? How much do they charge? People are mugs for paying for it when they can't stop you just joining in.
It's like when people tag on to guided tours, remain just a few feet away but stay close enough to eavesdrop the conversation.Good point. How can they stop you here or in Brockwell Park or anywhere where they have not paid to use the facilities?
Good point. How can they stop you here or in Brockwell Park or anywhere where they have not paid to use the facilities?
It seems a bit funny to want to sit and passively observe the world go by; and then complain that it's the wrong kind of world as it does.
Their website throws around the #flashmob hashtag a fair bit which gives the impression that they're spontaneous and unlicensed, but I could be wrong. Whether they paid or not is not really the issue anyway (that's why I didn't mention it in the OP). I was more interested in what people felt about commercial ventures taking over spaces in small public squares.I'm not sure anybody has clarified whether they are using the space without permission or not, unless somebody can prove they haven't then it's all a pretty pointless discussion.