Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Why the lib-dems are shit

I'm really looking forward to when Google's digitised all documents and because of their monopoly starts charging £1 a sheet to view.
 
Becuase of fairly blatant attempts to pretend that they're really against the cuts as the May elections approach - it wasn't us miss, a bigger boy did it and ran away

"These cuts will have an undoubted impact on all frontline council services, including care services to the vulnerable," they wrote.

"Rather than assist the country's recovery by making savings to the public in a way that can protect local economies and the front line, the cuts are structured in such a way that they will do the opposite."
 
or a desparate attempt to make it appear there's a difference between the parliamentary & local parties in time for the upcoming council elections? put away your wishful thinking...
to me,they indicate similar things; their municipal power-base is shitting themselves....
 
it isn't cracks though - it's clearly a deliberate policy to attempt to salvage what they can from the locals. do you think the letter wasn't endorsed by the leadership?
 
it isn't cracks though - it's clearly a deliberate policy to attempt to salvage what they can from the locals. do you think the letter wasn't endorsed by the leadership?

That does suggest at least modicum of base cunning among the Lib Dems at odds with the utter ineptitude we've come to expect from them.
 
from the comments:

Putting aside his looks as so many people wrote, his remarks - racist or not, his own party's acceptance of problems in him, his sense of humour, etc., you look deeper to see his contribution and you can't see anything outstanding.

You look into the wording of his blogs, you will see that he is obsessed with his hatred of Labour party. He sees a conspiracy in anything he commented on, which is perceived to be linked to Labour party. I think perhaps he is taking this as a War? And against who?
 
They've got a carefully constructed image of decentralisation. It's not real. This decentralisation was the safeguard that would stop there ever being a tory-lib-dem coalition remember? It's bollocks and they're all cunts.
 

I can't work out from that pic from getreading if it's a weird camera angle, or if he's a thalodomide victim - his right arm looks out of perspective:

C_67_article_2087269_body_articleblock_0_bodyimage.jpg


Maybe he was thinking it was OK because 'I is a disabled'* or something

* note to idiots - I am lampooning the language he used in a blatantly racist insult so don't get too hung up on that comment
 
difficult to say-the LDs are V DeCentralist,and LD councillors often not that subservient.

this again. you've been repeating it like a nun with a roseary for 10 months now... as yet, no lib-dem footsoldiers appearing on white steeds to rescue us all. clue as to why that hasn't happened: because it's not going to.
 
I can't work out from that pic from getreading if it's a weird camera angle, or if he's a thalodomide victim - his right arm looks out of perspective:

C_67_article_2087269_body_articleblock_0_bodyimage.jpg


Maybe he was thinking it was OK because 'I is a disabled'* or something

* note to idiots - I am lampooning the language he used in a blatantly racist insult so don't get too hung up on that comment

I've met him - he's able bodied (though his mother is sri lankan, so he can be as racist as he likes - some of his best friends....have anglo-saxon features, names and upbringings but might be a bit "ethnic" etc).

No, it just seems to be his mental processes which are disadvantaged...
 
this again. you've been repeating it like a nun with a roseary for 10 months now... as yet, no lib-dem footsoldiers appearing on white steeds to rescue us all. clue as to why that hasn't happened: because it's not going to.
I would certainly not reach that judgement too soon - it's early days as yet
 
The lib-dem victory on trident in full effect:

Government ramps up Trident work despite coalition pledge

Last month a Freedom of Information (FoI) request exposed Ministry of Defence plans to purchase so-called ‘long lead’ items for building Trident replacement submarines. That would be all very well if construction had been agreed, but as the government announced last autumn, the ‘main gate’ decision on whether to go ahead or not will not be taken until after the next election - 2016 in fact.

...

Never mind the unauthorised expenditure on costly items at a time of swingeing government spending cuts, this is actually political dynamite for the coalition. In fact, it is a slap in the face for the Liberal Democrats, who fought for - and thought they had won - a delay in the decision on whether or not to replace Trident until 2016.

That agreement, outlined in October’s Strategic Defence and Security Review, allowed the Lib Dems to say, in a letter from the party president to its members:

“Trident will not be renewed this parliament - not on a Liberal Democrat watch.”

This rather begs the question of who knows what about these MoD purchases. Is the MoD pursuing its own track, irrespective of the political agreement and process set out by the coalition government? Or is the coalition government pulling the wool over everyone’s eyes, including those of the vast majority of Liberal Democrat members who oppose Trident and expect their leadership to come up trumps on the issue?
 
You make a good point.

I have to agree that it is all bollox and we better hope that we will survice the decimation of the country. And they can shove the 'Big Society' up their collective arseholes. Clegg should have no probs as he has be getting fucked by his big brother ever since he jumped into bed with the bastard.
 
The edl were all over that on their forums the other week - they, like MM mistook a piss-take article for a political program (not that i fully trust SY either). Nice company.
 
Back
Top Bottom