Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Why the lib-dems are shit

Glover's lasted piece of self delusion - some corkers in there:

Ten tips for the Liberal Democrats

3) Oh, and win the AV referendum. It's not impossible. And if not that, then at least win the public over to coalition government. It's happening: voters like co-operation and they see the Lib Dems as a moderating force. In 2015 the message should be: like the coalition and want it to continue? Then you'll have to vote Lib Dem.

4) Join forces with Labour in Scotland next May

Hug students close

Don't panic. There is no crisis.

No one expects the opposition to approve of doing deals with Tories. But the majority of voters understand why it happened. Labour has misjudged the tone. Sneering at Clegg's party will not destroy it. Labour comes over as angry and isolated

He really is the boy in the bubble isn't he?
 
Labour lol. :facepalm:

"Hug students close" what drivel is this,especially when half of them would run a mile from him. he deserves a slap
 
Lib-dems now demanding cuts to the EU's budget, including the social fund


Thats incredible, it is only regeneration funds, etc from Europe that have kept cities and regions in the North from going belly up..
 
Item 4 on the agenda. "See if MI5 can arrange to brain-wipe the entire population, so that we can pretend we haven't broken any pledges".
 
Thats incredible, it is only regeneration funds, etc from Europe that have kept cities and regions in the North from going belly up..

So, what does that tell you?
It tells me that we can gauge exactly how much the coalition cares about anywhere that isn't a core constituency.
 
Julian Glover said:
No one expects the opposition to approve of doing deals with Tories. But the majority of voters understand why it happened. Labour has misjudged the tone. Sneering at Clegg's party will not destroy it. Labour comes over as angry and isolated

That would be why the latest YouGov poll puts Labour on 39% and the Lib Dems on 11%
 
Some interesting results here, LD vote in urban areas is suffering...

Coleridge Ward, Cambridge City Council. Lab gain from Con. Lab 900 (44%, +11.7), Con 734 (35.9%, +7.5), LD 223 (10.9%, -14.6), Green 137 (6.7%, -4.2), UKIP 53 (2.6%, -0.3). Swing of 1.6% from Con to Lab since May this year.

Cenarth Ward, Carmarthen CC. PC gain from Ind. PC 636 (81.9%, +59.4), Con 141 (18.1%, +18.1). Swing of 20.7% from Con to PC since 2008.

Ladywell Ward, LB Lewisham. Lab hold. Lab 1231 (41.4%, +3.2), Green 1041 (35%, +6.4), LD 314 (10.6%, -5.2), People not Profit 233 (7.8%, nc), Con 153 (5.1%, -4.6). Swing of 1.6% from Lab to Green since May this year. This ward had 3 Green councillors until May.

Hulme Ward, Manchester MBC. Lab hold. Lab 1035 (60.7%, +14.9), Green 451 (26.5%, +4.5), LD 151 (8.9%. -14.1), Con 67 (3.9%, -6.3). Swing of 5.2% from Green to Lab since May this year.

Ponteland East Division, Northumberland CC. Con hold. Con 843 (62.6%, +2.1), LD 403 (29.9%, +1.6), Lab 100 (7.4%, +2.9). Swing of 0.3% from LD to Con since 2008.

Lyth Valley Ward, South Lakeland DC. Con gain from LD. Con 474 (49.5%, +5.1), LD 451 (47.1%, -8.5), Lab 32 (3.3%, +3.3). Swing of 6.8% from LD to Con since 2008.

Moredon Ward, Swindon UA. Lab gain from Con. Lab 887 (47.5%, +12.2), Con 755 (40.4%, +1.9), UKIP 129 (6.9%, +6.9), LD 98 (5.2%, -12.9). Swing of 5.2% from Con to Lab since May this year.
 
The best thing that could be said about them is that their policies may politicise and/or re-politicise people.

Certainly I've encountered more political discussions in staff rooms and public places in the last few weeks than in any time since New Labour came to power (apart from during the Oil Wars).
 
15 years to the day of the execution of Ken Saro- Wiwa. 15 years since Vince Cable did his pilate act. 15 years of principles. 15 years of new politics.
 
Has anyone linked to Nick Clegg writing in the Guardian?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/nov/09/poverty-plus-pound-not-enough

The coalition's welfare reforms will at last make work pay. That is what we mean by fairness.

Our welfare reform plans go hand in hand with our investments in long-term social mobility. In the comprehensive spending review we announced a £7bn "fairness premium", stretching from the age of two to 20. These investments are intended to promote social mobility, to ensure that children are able to rise regardless of their background.

If only it were true I may cut them some slack. But Ive seen very little that will actually improve social mobility, and of course most of Cleggs self-delusions are likely to fail quickly if private sector jobs dont materialise.
 
these revealations are like a regular guardian column now. why can't these whores just backtrack on every single pledge and be done with it.
 
Back
Top Bottom