Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact
  • Hi Guest,
    We have now moved the boards to the new server hardware.
    Search will be impaired while it re-indexes the posts.
    See the thread in the Feedback forum for updates and feedback.
    Lazy Llama

Why do you want to shut down McDonalds?

The natural beef flavour is because people complained when they stopped frying in lard. There's no actual beef in the UK ones because of our large hindu population. Unlike the US.
 
Okay, they're not always reconstituted mash, but they are usually full of crap (see my previous post). Now I'm not saying these things are inedible or disgusting, as they can be quite tasty and addictive. But I do want to know whether I'm getting a chip (fried spud) or a "French fry" (fried spud with possible variations and additives).
 
Okay, they're not always reconstituted mash, but they are usually full of crap (see my previous post). Now I'm not saying these things are inedible or disgusting, as they can be quite tasty and addictive. But I do want to know whether I'm getting a chip (fried spud) or a "French fry" (fried spud with possible variations and additives).

Oven chips seem pretty similar tbh

 
Okay, they're not always reconstituted mash, but they are usually full of crap (see my previous post). Now I'm not saying these things are inedible or disgusting, as they can be quite tasty and addictive. But I do want to know whether I'm getting a chip (fried spud) or a "French fry" (fried spud with possible variations and additives).

Well they're no more full of crap than other frozen chips are. That's not a McDonalds thing though, it's a frozen chip thing.
 
Well they're no more full of crap than other frozen chips are. That's not a McDonalds thing though, it's a frozen chip thing.
Fair point but I assumed we were talking about chippy chips. My son worked in a fish and chips shop and said they bought the spuds, dumped them in the chip cutting machine then deep fat fried them in oil. No mucking about with all the other stuff.
 
Fair point but I assumed we were talking about chippy chips. My son worked in a fish and chips shop and said they bought the spuds, dumped them in the chip cutting machine then deep fat fried them in oil. No mucking about with all the other stuff.

Some undoubtedly still do it the old fashioned way like that, and more power to them. I strongly suspect though, that the vast majority of chippies nowadays are using frozen, pre-cut stuff, along with batter mixes and in most cases, frozen fish.
 
No it isn't!

Seven of those are the same thing (oil) and one is potatoes. :D
Two of those oils are about as healthy as dogshit, as well as being completely unnecessary. Not to mention cunting processed wheat, and cunting processed milk. I'm surprised they resisted the temptation to sprinkle a bit of enriched plutonium for good luck.
 
Two of those oils are about as healthy as dogshit, as well as being completely unnecessary. Not to mention cunting processed wheat, and cunting processed milk. I'm surprised they resisted the temptation to sprinkle a bit of enriched plutonium for good luck.

I don't think anyone's claiming that it's health food.
 
Got a link for that? :hmm: i'm a bit sceptical.

I read it in a book about McDonalds years ago. However, this article confirms the US version is not vegetation, but if you look at the ingredients for the UK you will find it is.


 
I read it in a book about McDonalds years ago. However, this article confirms the US version is not vegetation, but if you look at the ingredients for the UK you will find it is.


Must admit i skim read the thread and i thought you were talking about the burgers not having beef not the fries. Hence the sceptism :D
 
Wrong. Mac's fries are not pure potato. I see they even have beef flavouring in them.

It's PETA bollocks.

TBF, that's not the only site claiming their fries are not vegetarian ( my earlier link also mentions " natural beef flavouring). But hey, who cares, MCs is shite.
 
See my post above
TBH, I care not. Their fries, the simplest of foods are full of shit and they are a shit company, which is why I contributed to this thread ( of which there are several like it) in the first place. If people want to buy stuff from them, it's a free country and good luck to them.
 
Pretty much every cafe and bistro in France, for starters.

I'm sure, but I thought that "French" fries were actually Belgian in origin? Although I think that's a somewhat understandable error to make, it took me an embarrassingly long time to realise that Poirot is Belgian not French.
 
I'm sure, but I thought that "French" fries were actually Belgian in origin? Although I think that's a somewhat understandable error to make, it took me an embarrassingly long time to realise that Poirot is Belgian not French.

I mean it's pretty similar. Much of Belgium was part of France right? :p
 
I'm sure, but I thought that "French" fries were actually Belgian in origin? Although I think that's a somewhat understandable error to make, it took me an embarrassingly long time to realise that Poirot is Belgian not French.
French fries (though not with that name)were invented before Belgium became a state in its own right. There are references to French fries being sold during the French revolution in the 18th century and Belgium didn't become a country till 1830 or so.
 
Why would they piss about doing that when they can just cut the fucking spuds into the shape they want in the first place?

I don't think McDonald's do it, but one reason a company might make chip shapes out of potato slurry, is because, like Pringles, the product would be so processed it's basically pre-digested, meaning a person could eat a lot more of them without feeling full
 
Quite a few years ago I, as part of a course I was doing, studied food legislation. There was, IIRC, a definition of fry v chip which related to the square area of the potato product. Again IIRC a chip had to have an area of ¼" x ¼", but it's a long time ago.

As I remember the difference, according to the regulations, was literally, as many are saying here, was the size with the skinny one being defined as fries and the thick ones being defined as chips. So, if you say fry you're referring to a specific product, and, of course, the same if you refer to a chip you mean a thicker cut potato product. They were not the same thing.
 
Quite a few years ago I, as part of a course I was doing, studied food legislation. There was, IIRC, a definition of fry v chip which related to the square area of the potato product. Again IIRC a chip had to have an area of ¼" x ¼", but it's a long time ago.

As I remember the difference, according to the regulations, was literally, as many are saying here, was the size with the skinny one being defined as fries and the thick ones being defined as chips. So, if you say fry you're referring to a specific product, and, of course, the same if you refer to a chip you mean a thicker cut potato product. They were not the same thing.

Whose “regulations” and “legislation” were these?
 
Back
Top Bottom