friedaweed
Me and me girl named Jane
Strokes chin...They also allow that all-important ability to look like you're carefully considering someone's tedious point by stroking your chin.
Strokes chin...They also allow that all-important ability to look like you're carefully considering someone's tedious point by stroking your chin.
Anyway it’s just testosterone isn’t it.
Strokes chin...
And I think to myself, what a wonderful world. Oh yeah!That’s what Lance Armstrong said.
That's Louie chuckAnd I think to myself, what a wonderful world. Oh yeah!
And I think to myself, what a wonderful world. Oh yeah!
One small step for mankind...That's Louie chuck
I am doing this whilst reading your postThey also allow that all-important ability to look like you're carefully considering someone's tedious point by stroking your chin.
tbf, when I am hunting and gathering, my beard does a fine jobI always thought beards were to protect the skin on the face from bad weather when out hunting and gathering.
tbf, when I am hunting and gathering, my beard does a fine job
I am doing this whilst reading your post
flying ants for tea tonightDoes it catch a lot ?
Mind you some men have very little facial hair and some women have pretty much full on beards and mustaches.
A lot's in the presentation.
Like whether you shave it or not.True
Not sure what you mean?
except the pubic hair obvs, thats got a functionI think the more interesting question is 'why did evolution strip us of most of our useful hair?' One possible explanation put forward by Stephen Jay Gould, which I find very plausible, is that it's a by-product of neoteny - the maintenance of certain juvenile characteristics throughout life, which enables us to have far more plastic brains life-long rather than just in childhood, as is the case with most other mammals: the old 'you can't teach an old dog new tricks' saying also applies to chimpanzees. The plausibility of that idea is increased by the fact that what hair we do have left matches the pattern of hair on immature mammals of other species.
So a particular genetic mutation, possibly a very simple one, delays maturity indefinitely, keeping our brains more plastic, but with a side-effect of nakedness, which is a problem, but a problem that we can solve with our better brain power. The various bits of hair that are left on males or females are mostly a product of serendipity.
I think the more interesting question is 'why did evolution strip us of most of our useful hair?' One possible explanation put forward by Stephen Jay Gould, which I find very plausible, is that it's a by-product of neoteny - the maintenance of certain juvenile characteristics throughout life, which enables us to have far more plastic brains life-long rather than just in childhood, as is the case with most other mammals: the old 'you can't teach an old dog new tricks' saying also applies to chimpanzees. The plausibility of that idea is increased by the fact that what hair we do have left matches the pattern of hair on immature mammals of other species.
So a particular genetic mutation, possibly a very simple one, delays maturity indefinitely, keeping our brains more plastic, but with a side-effect of nakedness, which is a problem, but a problem that we can solve with our better brain power. The various bits of hair that are left on males or females are mostly a product of serendipity.
The hair we have left is useful - on the head to keep it warm/stop it from burning. And elsewhere to prevent chafing. But I don't find any explanation for why being naked elsewhere is beneficial to be persuasive. We're endurance runners, or were, yes, hence we sweat so much. But so are horses, and they haven't lost their hair. Hair keeps you warm in the cold and protects against the sun in the hot, so you'd think an endurance runner might have short hair like a horse, but not no hair like us (well, not no hair, but no useful hair - we have as many hairs as a chimp). imo a by-product of neoteny that in and of itself is not really beneficial is more persuasive.except the pubic hair obvs, thats got a function
Neoteny would be the explanation for why we're 'naked apes'. The argument here would be that our nakedness isn't actually a benefit to us at all - it's a cost, but that cost is outweighed by the benefits of neoteny in terms of brain plasticity, so neoteny was selected by natural selection despite the nakedness that it brought along with it.How does neoteny accommodate the naked ape theory? Or have they not been considered together?
Neoteny would be the explanation for why we're 'naked apes'. The argument here would be that our nakedness isn't actually a benefit to us at all - it's a cost, but that cost is outweighed by the benefits of neoteny in terms of brain plasticity, so neoteny was selected by natural selection despite the nakedness that it brought along with it.
That's the aquatic ape theory.My understanding of the naked ape theory is that we lost our hair in order to be more mobile and efficient in the water.
except the pubic hair obvs, thats got a function