Yes, d'oh, I mean freepost addresses. AFAIK you can always return post to sender, though this may not count as actual post so not sure.Return to sender is different to a freepost address though, isn't it?
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/liverpool-mayor-joe-anderson-condemns-7261657
We didn't get a copy due to local postal workers refusing to touch it.
Now Milliband has (according to the Echo) apologised for being seen brandishing a copy while glaring bug-eyed at the camera.
It's quite satisfying to watch the Sun becoming as toxic to be seen with as Gary Glitter.
to be fair? bollocks
it is straight forward endorsement
disgusting and foolish
mine just arrived...handy cos I was just off for a shite!
It could be worse - he could have been holding a copy of the Daily Mail.
It's something to do with weight. So returning the item is ok, but bricks aren't. butchersapron has the details (sorry to ask you again)I'd rather not return it if there's a chance Royal Mail will foot the bill. I thought Freepost was basically post on tic, and other people have said there is a weight limit but that's it.
so? take that risk, be different, make a standIf he hadn't done it, I imagine it would have been "Milliband the man who doesn't back our boys"
so? take that risk, be different, make a stand
oh wait...
I just put it in the recycling in the end. I admire the efforts that people are making but I just treated it like any other unwanted paper that somebody had left on my doorstep.
These "return to sender" things I understand often end up simply with Royal Mail paying the charges, not News International - that was the case with all the stuff about returning UKIP leaflets etc.
We didn't get one, I'm disappointed, I'd got the fire pit ready and everything.
That isn't worse than sending a very direct FUCK OFF to Merseyside.
I'm going to use it as inspiration for serial killing, bumping off everyone shown on the front cover in order.