Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

What stupid shit has Trump done today?

Trump's game seems to be to undo so much progress and to preserve the interest of the ruling class/wealthy few. Take for example Melania wearing that message on her back on the way to visit the detention centre. They don't actually give a fuck. He and his gang do represent authoritarianism, but only insofar as it is useful in entrenching privilege.

The far right come in as a bulwark. A support base, and one that is virulently opposed to everything they deem 'socialist'. How far he will go to placate them would depend on how sincere he is (not very) plotted against his doesn't give a fuck about anyone attitude, which is more sincere. So I'm not sure he is stupid or crazy. And its easy to sound like I treat this as some academic exercise when I am thousands of miles away. I will say though that class politics remains very relevant over there as some kind of counter movement. That's just my take.

So, to go back to what I said; Trump does seem very inconsistent (on the surface), but in terms of fucking things up for the majority, not so much.
Agree but think he's going to suffer death by a thousand cuts amongst a base that cheered for 'draining the swamp'
 
Depressing, but is anyone really surprised?

"A Reuters/Ipsos poll this week found that despite a firestorm of media criticism, Mr Trump's Finland summit had no real impact on his overall approval ratings.

In the survey, 42% of all registered voters approved of his job performance, which is consistent with averages thus far.

Some 71% of Republicans polled approved of his response to Russia, while only 14% of Democrats were in favour."


Trump lashes out at Putin summit 'haters'
With all his apparent bumbling and stupidity, he's actually a brilliant politician, in that he's convinced his base he's not a politician......but one of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CRI
Take That, Drumpf! British Protesters Flew A Trump Baby Balloon To Symbolize That He Is Full Of Innocent Love And Infinite Curiosity

During Trump’s trip to England, protesters totally owned him in the most awesome way possible. A giant balloon of Trump as a baby flew over the streets of London to demonstrate that he is full of innocent love and infinite curiosity.

Resistance FTW! This baby balloon perfectly captures Drumpf’s affectionate nature and childlike wonder for all things!
 
“As president, I cannot make decisions on foreign policy in a futile effort to appease partisan critics or the media or Democrats who want to do nothing but resist and obstruct,” Trump said. “Constructive dialogue between the United States and Russia forwards the opportunity to open new pathways toward peace and stability in our world. I would rather take a political risk in pursuit of peace than to risk peace in pursuit of politics.”

-Trump

I dunno man, this seems like one of the more sensible things Trump has ever said.

When asked why US special counsel Robert Mueller, who investigates Russia’s alleged 2016 presidential election meddling, has put forward new accusations three days before the Russian-US summit, Putin replied: "I’m not interested in this issue."

"It’s internal political games of the United States. Don’t hold the relations between Russia and the United States hostage of your political struggle," he said. "And it’s quite clear to me that it is used in the internal political struggle, and it’s nothing to be proud of for American democracy to use such dirty methods in political rivalry."

-Putin

I honestly don't understand why seemingly intelligent people seem to prefer the idea of a cold war with Russia. I'm genuinely concerned about how wholesale and across the board the Russiagate hysteria has climbed, had things been like this during the Cuban Missile Crisis, or Able Archer, or any number of previous near-misses between these two nuclear super-powers I don't think we'd be alive today. Merely expressing doubt re Russiagate or even the idea that the presidents of the United States and the Russian Federation should meet and discuss issues will have one dismissed as a putin-bot, a crazy space-cadet or a strong-man idolator, it's incredibly depressing. Out of interest some things subjects the two presidents discussed (entirely too breifly in my opinion):

Ukraine
Syria
Accords toward the control of Cyber Warfare
Terrorism
Arms Control
Trade

These are what I recall off-head after watching this:



Please explain to me honestly and without malice why you think it's better to dismiss the whole effort of nuclear powers talking to each other in summits by use of these cartoonish Russian-gangster/Manhcurian-Candidate Hollywood-script type characterizations supplied to us by factions within the US power-structure that dominate the media? I just don't get how the narratives supplied by these people have become so... fashionable. I feel like the brakes have come off and the train is accelerating and people even on forums like this are just well into it and agree "down with brakes!" all in a cloud of terms like "highly likely" and "probably"- the new rigorous-enough I guess.

wot the fuck is happening?
 
This is the new disinfo talking point: if you don’t like trump then you want WW3. Binary bubble.

It’s possible to work for peace without acting like a long time intel asset.

It's similar to the Republican talking point on separating immigrant children from their parents. Either you support this monstrous policy or you must support letting all the "MS13 criminals" into the country. The array of choices are much broader than that.
 
This is the new disinfo talking point: if you don’t like trump then you want WW3. Binary bubble.

It’s possible to work for peace without acting like a long time intel asset.

But i dont like Trump, i think he's a complete nob. Whats alarming is that even Trump gets the basic idea that rsstarting cold wars (already declared a done-deal by many) is something we who live on Earth just dont need. People on reddit for example reckon Trump is "weak" for not "standing up to Russia"... How? Against what?

i would have thought this is the sort of strongman bollocks we want to get away from, not trials of masculinity or summik but rational realist pragmatism in a world where all states have as their foundation the accumilated comrpomses of raw force. You got force, we got force... thus force cancels eachother out so we need negotiation as a further arrangement of compromise right?
 
It's similar to the Republican talking point on separating immigrant children from their parents. Either you support this monstrous policy or you must support letting all the "MS13 criminals" into the country. The array of choices are much broader than that.

So you think the way Trump went about talking to Putin was wrong, and theres a better way to have gone about it? I can beleive that, Trump gets a lot of things wrong, even his position on NATO amounts to wanting more money for the same tub of Elephant Powder, rather than questioning if we even need Elephant Powder in the first place. (sprinkle a little elephant powder to keep rampaging elephants away, sure its expensive stuff but worth it, see how we remain free of rampaging elephants).
 
So you think the way Trump went about talking to Putin was wrong, and theres a better way to have gone about it? I can beleive that, Trump gets a lot of things wrong, even his position on NATO amounts to wanting more money for the same tub of Elephant Powder, rather than questioning if we even need Elephant Powder in the first place. (sprinkle a little elephant powder to keep rampaging elephants away, sure its expensive stuff but worth it, keeps them pesky elephants at bay).

Pretty much. I think if he's not complicit, he is a bit naive and completely inexperienced. There are better people out there to prepare the initial negotiations. As far as I'm concerned, a President's main job in this instance is to let diplomatic staff do their jobs and show up occasionally to take all the credit.
 
Pretty much. I think if he's not complicit, he is a bit naive and completely inexperienced. There are better people out there to prepare the initial negotiations. As far as I'm concerned, a President's main job in this instance is to let diplomatic staff do their jobs and show up occasionally to take all the credit.

I don't know exactly how the American system works, but I think that as POTUS only he can take the step to meet the POTRF or whatever head of state. After agreeing to bullet points that would be when what you said comes into effect no?Only the POTUS can say "right, I'm off to speak to China/Russia and discuss how we should proceed" etc. You couldn't expect to meet and discuss meaningfully with Putin in this case because you sent an underling.

Anyway it's the job of the president, naive or inexperienced or no it's like Spidermans dictum on responsibility init.
 

Them's the stakes. ABM treaty cancelled in 2001 iirc didn't just get forgotten by the media and then disappear, these are the continuing results. And I have to say re dismissing concerns about not kicking off world war three... there aren't any safety lines on this international policy re Russia thing, well there was at least a rope you could hold on to but that's since been cut away by the same spirit of the times that wants to deride a US president for speaking to the Russian president. Barmy, imo. I'd rather Bernie Sanders had been the one at the summit across the table from Putin, but it was Trump... nonetheless the talks need to happen, and must continue to happen. Jaw jaw an that.
 
Them's the stakes. ABM treaty cancelled in 2001 iirc didn't just get forgotten by the media and then disappear, these are the continuing results. And I have to say re dismissing concerns about not kicking off world war three... there aren't any safety lines on this international policy re Russia thing, well there was at least a rope you could hold on to but that's since been cut away by the same spirit of the times that wants to deride a US president for speaking to the Russian president. Barmy, imo. I'd rather Bernie Sanders had been the one at the summit across the table from Putin, but it was Trump... nonetheless the talks need to happen, and must continue to happen. Jaw jaw an that.

Talks need to happen? Not like these "talks" they don't.

Neither Sanders or Clinton would have arranged a meeting with Putin like this one. They wouldn't have gone in without being briefed to the hilt and with a full team of experienced senior diplomats behind them before, during and after the meeting. They would have had copious notes made and they wouldn't have only talked about issues in very general terms. Bear in mind, Clinton served as Secretary of State, so is an experienced diplomat, but still would never in a million years consider "winging it" like Trump did.

The Russian Government can now claim that Trump promised them pink unicorns on unicycles, and there's no way to prove he didn't, because he did not make a record of the meeting. And because they DO have a record, they can selectively release either portions of it that will be incriminating (because I bet there will be some doozies), or edit two hours of Trump's voice recordings to make it look like he said any thing that they want.

Whatever motivates Trump - narcissism, greed, ego, revenge, sociopathy, or a combination, he is an incredibly weak leader who thinks he's strong, and is surrounded by yes men and women who's livelihood depends on fawning over and agreeing with him.

Trump, his "team," and GOP politicians lie, lie about lying and/or justify his lies. The lying isn't to deceive, because it's all out in the open. "Mr President, you said this on this video here." "No, I didn't say that. Fake news." And we're just supposed to accept the "Alternative Facts," and move on. Lying like this is about power and control, not deception. It's to demonstrate that the regime can lie, do anything they want, and lie some more, and the people can do absolutely fuck all about it, because their control over the people is absolute.

I'm still struggling to take anyone seriously who looks at the current crisis in the US, with massive implications for the entire planet, and thinks this is all just the same as it's always been.
 
Last edited:
Trump aims to end automatic protections for some species

The Trump administration on Thursday proposed ending automatic protections for threatened animal and plant species and limiting habitat safeguards that are meant to shield recovering species from harm.
Wildlife advocates and Democratic lawmakers said such moves would speed extinctions in the name of furthering the administration’s anti-environment agenda. Species currently under consideration for protections are considered especially at risk, including the North American wolverine and the monarch butterfly, they said.
“It essentially turns every listing of a species into a negotiation,” said Noah Greenwald with the Center for Biological Diversity. “They could decide that building in a species habitat or logging in trees where birds nest doesn’t constitute harm.”

Wouldn't be surprised if Trump specifically wants to nuke the Monarch Butterfly - state insect of Illinois, Obama's home state. :mad:

monarch1.jpg
 
From the Start, Trump Has Muddied a Clear Message: Putin Interfered

Two weeks before his inauguration, Donald J. Trump was shown highly classified intelligence indicating that President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia had personally ordered complex cyberattacks to sway the 2016 American election.
The evidence included texts and emails from Russian military officers and information gleaned from a top-secret source close to Mr. Putin, who had described to the C.I.A. how the Kremlin decided to execute its campaign of hacking and disinformation.
Mr. Trump sounded grudgingly convinced, according to several people who attended the intelligence briefing. But ever since, Mr. Trump has tried to cloud the very clear findings that he received on Jan. 6, 2017, which his own intelligence leaders have unanimously endorsed.

Then, there was this from last August.
Nine months, nine prominent Russians dead - CNN

giphy.gif
 
Talks need to happen? Not like these "talks" they don't.

Neither Sanders or Clinton would have arranged a meeting with Putin like this one. They wouldn't have gone in without being briefed to the hilt and with a full team of experienced senior diplomats behind them before, during and after the meeting. They would have had copious notes made and they wouldn't have only talked about issues in very general terms. Bear in mind, Clinton served as Secretary of State, so is an experienced diplomat, but still would never in a million years consider "winging it" like Trump did.

The Russian Government can now claim that Trump promised them pink unicorns on unicycles, and there's no way to prove he didn't, because he did not make a record of the meeting. And because they DO have a record, they can selectively release either portions of it that will be incriminating (because I bet there will be some doozies), or edit two hours of Trump's voice recordings to make it look like he said any thing that they want.

Whatever motivates Trump - narcissism, greed, ego, revenge, sociopathy, or a combination, he is an incredibly weak leader who thinks he's strong, and is surrounded by yes men and women who's livelihood depends on fawning over and agreeing with him.

Trump, his "team," and GOP politicians lie, lie about lying and/or justify his lies. The lying isn't to deceive, because it's all out in the open. "Mr President, you said this on this video here." "No, I didn't say that. Fake news." And we're just supposed to accept the "Alternative Facts," and move on. Lying like this is about power and control, not deception. It's to demonstrate that the regime can lie, do anything they want, and lie some more, and the people can do absolutely fuck all about it, because their control over the people is absolute.

I'm still struggling to take anyone seriously who looks at the current crisis in the US, with massive implications for the entire planet, and thinks this is all just the same as it's always been.

Republicans REALLY don't want anyone to know what happened in the meeting.

Republicans block subpoena for Trump-Putin summit interpreter

“One of the issues that’s come about as a result of the public comments he has made during that summit is what took place in the private two-hour meeting that the president had alone with Mr. Putin,” he said. “It appears there were commitments made in that meeting that affect American national security interests.” Schiff’s motion specified that the interpreter would be subpoenaed to testify in closed session before the House Intelligence committee.
After a brief roll call vote down that fell along party lines, Schiff’s motion was successfully tabled 11-6, squashing the effort. Senate Democrats are also exploring ways to hear from the interpreter and have demanded the Trump administration turn over all the "contemporaneous notes" taken during the meeting.

(Not "tabled" in the British sense, of "putting it on the table for discussion." In the American sense, it means putting off or ignoring - as in "putting under the table.)
 
Talks need to happen? Not like these "talks" they don't.

Neither Sanders or Clinton would have arranged a meeting with Putin like this one. They wouldn't have gone in without being briefed to the hilt and with a full team of experienced senior diplomats behind them before, during and after the meeting. They would have had copious notes made and they wouldn't have only talked about issues in very general terms. Bear in mind, Clinton served as Secretary of State, so is an experienced diplomat, but still would never in a million years consider "winging it" like Trump did.

The Russian Government can now claim that Trump promised them pink unicorns on unicycles, and there's no way to prove he didn't, because he did not make a record of the meeting. And because they DO have a record, they can selectively release either portions of it that will be incriminating (because I bet there will be some doozies), or edit two hours of Trump's voice recordings to make it look like he said any thing that they want.

Whatever motivates Trump - narcissism, greed, ego, revenge, sociopathy, or a combination, he is an incredibly weak leader who thinks he's strong, and is surrounded by yes men and women who's livelihood depends on fawning over and agreeing with him.

Trump, his "team," and GOP politicians lie, lie about lying and/or justify his lies. The lying isn't to deceive, because it's all out in the open. "Mr President, you said this on this video here." "No, I didn't say that. Fake news." And we're just supposed to accept the "Alternative Facts," and move on. Lying like this is about power and control, not deception. It's to demonstrate that the regime can lie, do anything they want, and lie some more, and the people can do absolutely fuck all about it, because their control over the people is absolute.

I'm still struggling to take anyone seriously who looks at the current crisis in the US, with massive implications for the entire planet, and thinks this is all just the same as it's always been.

I don't think things are the same as they've always been, this is dangerously worryingly different. The Trump effect is having a serious impact on the relations of the United States has with the other massive pile of nukes on the planet. By all means sort your politics out- frankly I don't think trying to blame big bad Russia for these issues helps anyone. I for one am not inclined to believe fuck all that the same people (media, politicians, spooks or brass) that bought us 45 minutes, Aluminum tubes, Viva Libya (with Manchester splashback but don't mind about that) and all the other bollocks in the past couple of decades now siddle up as one massive hive-mind to tell me this latest narrative they're obviously very keen that I swallow whole-sale. Tell you wot the way I think of a lot of people I see from forums to facebook has plunged since seeing how easy it is for the full-spectrum media to have everyone eating their troofs out the hands of the same dodgy short-sighted bastards that have a trillion-dollar military industry to justify. These state-backed conspiracy theories are so outlandish it's alarming that anyone takes em seriously... but they do. Is it becoz of the years of Russian gangsters in movies and the like that helps it all slide in so easy? As a black man you bet I recognize how it works, people know the script in this movie, who is to play the role of whom, the copious amounts of Ruski stereotypes that the Believers come out with make no doubt re the level we're dealing with here. But this is nuclear geopolitics for chrissakes!

Tell me, do you think it was an act of war for Russia to have meddled in the US elections? (I don't think they did but that's admittedly just my opinion) because if you do think that it was an attack- then surely it was an attack in a war the United States already started when they diddled with Russia's elections just after the fall of the Sovjet Union. They call Putin an authoritarian president but were totally happy when Yeltsin gathered all that presidential power to himself in the first place (Putins not changed the Russian constitution since he took power apparently, all his presidential power is the same setup he inherited that the West was happy for Yeltsin to grab). Come to think of it- where was all this shocked outrage when Americas boy Yeltsin had his tanks fire on the Russian parliament? Even this year the United States has been busy hosting events aimed at supporting the opposition in Russia while at the same time squealing about Russian interference in US politics. Now they've arrested some happless lobbyist and indicted a bunch of Russian military officers because they definitely want all the evidence to come out in court (hint- indicting military officers makes as much sense in the pursuit of truth as it would if Russia called on US officers to come face trial in Russia, that being zilch, which is probably why it was done). I don't say this because 'whataboutism' but rather as an example of how malleable and discretionary the grounds for outrage are. Like Lenin said re political violence init, it's not what was done but who it was done to.

And it's all so fucking petty as well, Russia made a world cup and it was alright, now comes the tsunami of shite to remind everyone how evil Russia is, the exact same game-plan as happened around the Winter Olympics when the coup was carried out in the Ukraine. And then suddenly more Novichok appears and takes out a couple of people, and suddenly just before the summit Meuller decides it's time to start indicting people... I mean the whole thing is so obvious and so orchestrated... I just really resent that this shit actually works (and that people can actually die for it). And it's not even that I like Russia particularly, a flawed society in its own special way like anywhere else. No, it's the cynical but effective manner in which our rulers can just manipulate our society in to believing whatever stupid fucking shite they want even with a Very Final War as the prize. Sic-em boy! Sic-em! that's what this amounts to, people are killed and we just sweep on secure in our own sense of superiority. I just can't believe everyone buys into it but they do! Boris Johnson sez something and everyones like "yeah, what Boris Johnson just said makes sense. Hear Hear" I mean christ!

Bah forget it, what happens happens, resume bashing away at your pinatas as directed. "lolwut, putinbot, space-cadet, conspiraloon." There, saved energy for ya.

\rant
 
I don't think things are the same as they've always been, this is dangerously worryingly different. The Trump effect is having a serious impact on the relations of the United States has with the other massive pile of nukes on the planet. By all means sort your politics out- frankly I don't think trying to blame big bad Russia for these issues helps anyone. I for one am not inclined to believe fuck all that the same people (media, politicians, spooks or brass) that bought us 45 minutes, Aluminum tubes, Viva Libya (with Manchester splashback but don't mind about that) and all the other bollocks in the past couple of decades now siddle up as one massive hive-mind to tell me this latest narrative they're obviously very keen that I swallow whole-sale. Tell you wot the way I think of a lot of people I see from forums to facebook has plunged since seeing how easy it is for the full-spectrum media to have everyone eating their troofs out the hands of the same dodgy short-sighted bastards that have a trillion-dollar military industry to justify. These state-backed conspiracy theories are so outlandish it's alarming that anyone takes em seriously... but they do. Is it becoz of the years of Russian gangsters in movies and the like that helps it all slide in so easy? As a black man you bet I recognize how it works, people know the script in this movie, who is to play the role of whom, the copious amounts of Ruski stereotypes that the Believers come out with make no doubt re the level we're dealing with here. But this is nuclear geopolitics for chrissakes!

Tell me, do you think it was an act of war for Russia to have meddled in the US elections? (I don't think they did but that's admittedly just my opinion) because if you do think that it was an attack- then surely it was an attack in a war the United States already started when they diddled with Russia's elections just after the fall of the Sovjet Union. They call Putin an authoritarian president but were totally happy when Yeltsin gathered all that presidential power to himself in the first place (Putins not changed the Russian constitution since he took power apparently, all his presidential power is the same setup he inherited that the West was happy for Yeltsin to grab). Come to think of it- where was all this shocked outrage when Americas boy Yeltsin had his tanks fire on the Russian parliament? Even this year the United States has been busy hosting events aimed at supporting the opposition in Russia while at the same time squealing about Russian interference in US politics. Now they've arrested some happless lobbyist and indicted a bunch of Russian military officers because they definitely want all the evidence to come out in court (hint- indicting military officers makes as much sense in the pursuit of truth as it would if Russia called on US officers to come face trial in Russia, that being zilch, which is probably why it was done). I don't say this because 'whataboutism' but rather as an example of how malleable and discretionary the grounds for outrage are. Like Lenin said re political violence init, it's not what was done but who it was done to.

And it's all so fucking petty as well, Russia made a world cup and it was alright, now comes the tsunami of shite to remind everyone how evil Russia is, the exact same game-plan as happened around the Winter Olympics when the coup was carried out in the Ukraine. And then suddenly more Novichok appears and takes out a couple of people, and suddenly just before the summit Meuller decides it's time to start indicting people... I mean the whole thing is so obvious and so orchestrated... I just really resent that this shit actually works (and that people can actually die for it). And it's not even that I like Russia particularly, a flawed society in its own special way like anywhere else. No, it's the cynical but effective manner in which our rulers can just manipulate our society in to believing whatever stupid fucking shite they want even with a Very Final War as the prize. Sic-em boy! Sic-em! that's what this amounts to, people are killed and we just sweep on secure in our own sense of superiority. I just can't believe everyone buys into it but they do! Boris Johnson sez something and everyones like "yeah, what Boris Johnson just said makes sense. Hear Hear" I mean christ!

Bah forget it, what happens happens, resume bashing away at your pinatas as directed. "lolwut, putinbot, space-cadet, conspiraloon." There, saved energy for ya.

\rant
I think the rules of what constitutes "war" have changed with the advent of technology. Most things have changed because of the internet. I mean 20 years ago, if you told someone your identity had been stolen, or a stranger used your credit card without it leaving your wallet, they'd think you'd lost your marbles.

I don't think the Trump/Putin relationship has anything to do with ideology. I think it is everything to do with two people, and those close to them amassing wealth and power in their respective spheres, having no regard for the rule of law and certainly no regard for human rights, or the environment, if any of those things get in the way of their goals - of amassing more wealth and power. Their acolytes are motivated by ideology, but that's a different thing. Both men (and in Trump's case, I'd widen it to people in his administration and GOP politicians) harness and exploit the beliefs of their followers to gain and retain power and wealth, but only need to make the most prefunctory efforts at showing they are "at one" with the beliefs of their people, and that's enough to keep them in the fold.

I don't think there is any doubt that the Russian government, or people working on their behalf, were involved in subverting the US elections. There were plenty other things that stacked the deck against Clinton and Democratic Parties, including voter suppression and intimidation, and some dodgy voting counts in swing states. I'm sure their preferred candidate was Trump with his long track record of unethical behaviour, craving for flattery and approval, so a piece of piss to influence as opposed to Clinton. I thing the Russian government's goal in all this was really just to get rid of the sanctions that were crippling their economy, and specifically the Magnitsky Act, which impacted most on rich Russians including those in the ruling elite. Putin probably wonders how the fuck anyone takes the clown Trump seriously, and with his intelligence background, hardly has to lift a finger to manipulate Trump. Proving a bit harder to push over the rest of the US Government, but getting there.
 
My Trump supporting cousins in South Carolina has posted this:



“The mayor of Livermore California explains Trump’s popularity and success. This is perhaps the best explanation for Trump's popularity ....

Marshall Kamena is a registered Democrat and was elected mayor of Livermore, CA.. He ran on the democratic ticket as he knew a Bay Area city would never vote for a Republican. He is as conservative as they come. He wrote the following:

Trump’s 'lack of decorum, dignity, and statesmanship' By Marshall Kamena, Mayor of Livermore, CA.

My Leftist friends (as well as many ardent #NeverTrumpers) constantly ask me if I’m not bothered by Donald Trump’s lack of decorum. They ask if I don’t think his tweets are “beneath the dignity of the office.”

Here’s my answer: We Right-thinking people have tried dignity. There could not have been a man of more quiet dignity than George W. Bush as he suffered the outrageous lies and politically motivated hatreds that undermined his presidency.

We tried statesmanship.

Could there be another human being on this earth who so desperately prized “collegiality” as John McCain?

We tried propriety – has there been a nicer human being ever than Mitt Romney?

And the results were always the same. This is because, while we were playing by the rules of dignity, collegiality and propriety, the Left has been, for the past 60 years, engaged in a knife fight where the only rules are those of Saul Alinsky and the Chicago mob.

I don’t find anything “dignified,” “collegial” or “proper” about Barack Obama’s lying about what went down on the streets of Ferguson in order to ramp up racial hatreds because racial hatreds serve the Democratic Party.

I don’t see anything “dignified” in lying about the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi and imprisoning an innocent filmmaker to cover your tracks.

I don’t see anything “statesman-like” in weaponizing the IRS to be used to destroy your political opponents and any dissent.

Yes, Obama was “articulate” and “polished” but in no way was he in the least bit “dignified,” “collegial” or “proper.”

The Left has been engaged in a war against America since the rise of the Children of the ‘60s. To them, it has been an all-out war where nothing is held sacred and nothing is seen as beyond the pale.. It has been a war they’ve fought with violence, the threat of violence, demagoguery and lies from day one – the violent take-over of the universities – till today.

The problem is that, through these years, the Left has been the only side fighting this war. While the Left has been taking a knife to anyone who stands in their way, the Right has continued to act with dignity, collegiality and propriety.

With Donald Trump, this all has come to an end. Donald Trump is America ’s first wartime president in the Culture War.

During wartime, things like “dignity” and “collegiality” simply aren’t the most essential qualities one looks for in their warriors. Ulysses Grant was a drunk whose behavior in peacetime might well have seen him drummed out of the Army for conduct unbecoming.

Had Abraham Lincoln applied the peacetime rules of propriety and booted Grant, the Democrats might well still be holding their slaves today.

Lincoln rightly recognized that, “I cannot spare this man. He fights.”

General George Patton was a vulgar-talking.. In peacetime, this might have seen him stripped of rank. But, had Franklin Roosevelt applied the normal rules of decorum then, Hitler and the Socialists would barely be five decades into their thousand-year Reich.

Trump is fighting. And what’s particularly delicious is that, like Patton standing over the battlefield as his tanks obliterated Rommel’s, he’s shouting, “You magnificent bastards, I read your book!”

That is just the icing on the cake, but it’s wonderful to see that not only is Trump fighting, he’s defeating the Left using their own tactics. That book is Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals – a book so essential to the Liberals’ war against America that it is and was the playbook for the entire Obama administration and the subject of Hillary Clinton’s senior thesis.

It is a book of such pure evil, that, just as the rest of us would dedicate our book to those we most love or those to whom we are most indebted, Alinsky dedicated his book to Lucifer.

Trump’s tweets may seem rash and unconsidered but, in reality, he is doing exactly what Alinsky suggested his followers do. First, instead of going after “the fake media” — and they are so fake that they have literally gotten every single significant story of the past 60 years not just wrong, but diametrically opposed to the truth, from the Tet Offensive to Benghazi, to what really happened on the streets of Ferguson, Missouri — Trump isolated CNN.. He made it personal.

Then, just as Alinsky suggests, he employs ridicule which Alinsky described as “the most powerful weapon of all.”... Most importantly, Trump’s tweets have put CNN in an untenable and unwinnable position. ... They need to respond.

This leaves them with only two choices. They can either “go high” (as Hillary would disingenuously declare of herself and the fake news would disingenuously report as the truth) and begin to honestly and accurately report the news or they can double-down on their usual tactics and hope to defeat Trump with twice their usual hysteria and demagoguery. The problem for CNN (et al.) with the former is that, if they were to start honestly reporting the news, that would be the end of the Democratic Party they serve. It is nothing but the incessant use of fake news (read: propaganda) that keeps the Left alive.

Imagine, for example, if CNN had honestly and accurately reported then-candidate Barack Obama’s close ties to foreign terrorists (Rashid Khalidi), domestic terrorists (William Ayers & Bernardine Dohrn), the mafia (Tony Rezko) or the true evils of his spiritual mentor, Jeremiah Wright’s church.

Imagine if they had honestly and accurately conveyed the evils of the Obama administration’s weaponizing of the IRS to be used against their political opponents or his running of guns to the Mexican cartels or the truth about the murder of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and the Obama administration’s cover-up.

So, to my friends on the Left — and the #NeverTrumpers as well — do I wish we lived in a time when our president could be “collegial” and “dignified” and “proper”? Of course I do.

These aren’t those times. This is war. And it’s a war that the Left has been fighting without opposition for the past 50 years.

So, say anything you want about this president - I get it - he can be vulgar, he can be crude, he can be undignified at times. I don’t care. I can’t spare this man. He fights for America!

Please pass this on..over and over, and again and again...”

Any Trump supporting relatives I have are dead to me. Thankfully there are none in my immediate family, but if there were, I wouldn't piss on them of they were on fire.

This little "viral post" is just one of the hundreds conjured up from anecdotes and blatant lies for the purpose of making bigoted white people feel justified in their bigotry and their backing of bigoted politicians. They'll do mental back flips to rationalise what their dear leaders do if it means they'll get what they want (e.g. abortion banned, gays back in the closet, brown people expelled, etc.) They want it passed on over and over, because the more people who nod that this is okay, the more they'll feel justified.

They hold racist, homophobic, xenophobic, misogynist, etc. views, but they don't want anyone to think they are bad people. They are deeply wounded at the very suggestion that they may be something other than "good people." Remember the dramatic response to Clinton saying some Trump supporters were deplorable? More recently, Press Secretary Sanders and other administration/GOP people who were refused service or challenged publicly were painted as helpless victims of "uncivilised" treatment. They believe they are entitled to respect, because in their minds, they are still "good," regardless of their beliefs.

They know on some level that they are being duplicitous, which is why they need the constant reinforcement that viral posts like this, Fox News, Right Wing talk radio, Evangelical Preachers, etc. give them.
 
Last edited:
I don't think things are the same as they've always been, this is dangerously worryingly different. The Trump effect is having a serious impact on the relations of the United States has with the other massive pile of nukes on the planet. By all means sort your politics out- frankly I don't think trying to blame big bad Russia for these issues helps anyone. I for one am not inclined to believe fuck all that the same people (media, politicians, spooks or brass) that bought us 45 minutes, Aluminum tubes, Viva Libya (with Manchester splashback but don't mind about that) and all the other bollocks in the past couple of decades now siddle up as one massive hive-mind to tell me this latest narrative they're obviously very keen that I swallow whole-sale. Tell you wot the way I think of a lot of people I see from forums to facebook has plunged since seeing how easy it is for the full-spectrum media to have everyone eating their troofs out the hands of the same dodgy short-sighted bastards that have a trillion-dollar military industry to justify. These state-backed conspiracy theories are so outlandish it's alarming that anyone takes em seriously... but they do. Is it becoz of the years of Russian gangsters in movies and the like that helps it all slide in so easy? As a black man you bet I recognize how it works, people know the script in this movie, who is to play the role of whom, the copious amounts of Ruski stereotypes that the Believers come out with make no doubt re the level we're dealing with here. But this is nuclear geopolitics for chrissakes!

Tell me, do you think it was an act of war for Russia to have meddled in the US elections? (I don't think they did but that's admittedly just my opinion) because if you do think that it was an attack- then surely it was an attack in a war the United States already started when they diddled with Russia's elections just after the fall of the Sovjet Union. They call Putin an authoritarian president but were totally happy when Yeltsin gathered all that presidential power to himself in the first place (Putins not changed the Russian constitution since he took power apparently, all his presidential power is the same setup he inherited that the West was happy for Yeltsin to grab). Come to think of it- where was all this shocked outrage when Americas boy Yeltsin had his tanks fire on the Russian parliament? Even this year the United States has been busy hosting events aimed at supporting the opposition in Russia while at the same time squealing about Russian interference in US politics. Now they've arrested some happless lobbyist and indicted a bunch of Russian military officers because they definitely want all the evidence to come out in court (hint- indicting military officers makes as much sense in the pursuit of truth as it would if Russia called on US officers to come face trial in Russia, that being zilch, which is probably why it was done). I don't say this because 'whataboutism' but rather as an example of how malleable and discretionary the grounds for outrage are. Like Lenin said re political violence init, it's not what was done but who it was done to.

And it's all so fucking petty as well, Russia made a world cup and it was alright, now comes the tsunami of shite to remind everyone how evil Russia is, the exact same game-plan as happened around the Winter Olympics when the coup was carried out in the Ukraine. And then suddenly more Novichok appears and takes out a couple of people, and suddenly just before the summit Meuller decides it's time to start indicting people... I mean the whole thing is so obvious and so orchestrated... I just really resent that this shit actually works (and that people can actually die for it). And it's not even that I like Russia particularly, a flawed society in its own special way like anywhere else. No, it's the cynical but effective manner in which our rulers can just manipulate our society in to believing whatever stupid fucking shite they want even with a Very Final War as the prize. Sic-em boy! Sic-em! that's what this amounts to, people are killed and we just sweep on secure in our own sense of superiority. I just can't believe everyone buys into it but they do! Boris Johnson sez something and everyones like "yeah, what Boris Johnson just said makes sense. Hear Hear" I mean christ!

Bah forget it, what happens happens, resume bashing away at your pinatas as directed. "lolwut, putinbot, space-cadet, conspiraloon." There, saved energy for ya.

\rant

Ukraine, downed plane, assasinated critics, jailed opponents, murdered journalists, spies, meddling in US and European affairs, nerve agents, Assadists. Of course the Putin admin is innocent.

None of this is happening.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CRI
Seems some want the interprater to spill what she heard in the meeting.
Normally I would agree but this is far from normal.
However, she must be treated with the respect she deserves because she isn't one of Trump's monkeys, just a long term professional doing her job.
 
Seems some want the interprater to spill what she heard in the meeting.
Normally I would agree but this is far from normal.
However, she must be treated with the respect she deserves because she isn't one of Trump's monkeys, just a long term professional doing her job.

Apologies to monkeys - they're way better than any of Trump's idiots
 
  • Like
Reactions: CRI
Back
Top Bottom