Why don't you get a clue what you are talking about.I thought you lot hated the law.
They still can not force photographers to delete the images, unless they have been arrested, charged and then found guilty. If the photos are the evidence, then they must not be deleted, otherwise there is no case!http://www.urban75.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=8779031#post8779031 has the law. They do not appear to need intent. It is a question of how the photo could be used. It is a shite law that has never been tested in court and was obviously not intended to be used in this way.
It is a shite law...
...that has never been tested in court...
...and was obviously not intended to be used in this way.
They still can not force photographers to delete the images, unless they have been arrested, charged and then found guilty. If the photos are the evidence, then they must not be deleted, otherwise there is no case!
http://www.urban75.org/photos/photographers-rights-and-the-law.html#terrorism
fuck... ITV news just said 1 man's collapsed and died at the protests today.
If this is true then they really have overstepped the mark. They have no right to delete the images. If the images contain 'illegal' images, then they are evidence.
Almost certainly not true. How would a picture of a copper help a terrorist? If their evil scheme hinged on knowing what coppers look like, could they not go and look at some and then just remember? Yet another case of slipping in bullshit legislation under the unassailable guise of 'anti-terrorism'.
as said on twitter people have phones and lap tops e mail worldwarfreeatriseupdotnet for ftp access will upload any images
That's exactly it. All my posts today have been quite consistent re my views of the coverage - what the fuck are they playing at now?
If this is true then they really have overstepped the mark. They have no right to delete the images. If the images contain 'illegal' images, then they are evidence.
this makes me so so angry. compared to the shit storm up threadneedle street (which was largely allowed and bought about by the plod anyway), to hear about the fuckers intimidating such a fluffy bunch of people having such a decent time with an agreed plan of retreat smacks of heavy handed authoritarianism of the very worst. excel should be fun eh cunts yes:I thought that they had exactly the right idea - if you're worried about being kettled in and not being able to move around, why not take a tent and some food and make staying there the whole point?
Which is why I imagine they have to be stomped on, I suppose. Can't have people who don't mind it when the police "contain them for public order reasons".
yep, it's the police's legalised theft trump cardI tried to take a phone pic of cops supervising two guys removeing two chalked @ Anarchy signs in Coleman Street - I was told that if I continued my phone would have to be "taken as evidence" - fucking surreal!!!
and scarey
I am totally enraged
indymedia22:20 - Climate Camp: Up to a thousand people remain inside the besiged camp. The police have said that they will allow people to leave, but will take names and addresses of everyone who does so. There's been a camp meeting but no consensus has been reached on what to do. Generally there is still a positive atmosphere amonst the peaceful demonstrators.
I'm really glad I went today and witnessed what was going on. It's important to see this kind of shit first hand and publicise what you've seen.I am totally enraged
No, they need a court order. Association of Chief Police Officers says so.I tried to take a phone pic of cops supervising two guys removeing two chalked @ Anarchy signs in Coleman Street - I was told that if I continued my phone would have to be "taken as evidence" - fucking surreal!!!
and scarey
I am totally enraged
earlier12:12 - Space Hijackers: 10 of them have been arrested under Section 19 of the Police Act for 'impersonating the police' outside News International. They have been taken to the West End central police station.
indymedia again10:30: The Space Hijackers have turned up outside the RBS with an 'police armoured vehicle' with lots of CCTV cameras on top. The vehicle hasn't been able to move towards Bishopsgate because police has stopped it and are now conducting a thorough search.
Obviously nothing to do with the police forcing him to stay in that area for hours on end then.according to sky a 30 year old man died at around 7.30pm this evening near the BofE.
the smear campaign is up and running, they're saying they were pelted with bottles when they tried to take him away.
I made the mistake of reading the Daily Mail report: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...s-anti-capitalists-ransack-City-G20-riot.html
*cunts
Police have resorted to wearing riot gear this evening as they confront protesters
The Court of Appeal inserted mens rea into a similar law a while back, and it's likely they'll do the same with this when a case reaches court. Which can't be too long if the police are making free with it.http://www.urban75.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=8779031#post8779031 has the law. They do not appear to need intent. It is a question of how the photo could be used. It is a shite law that has never been tested in court and was obviously not intended to be used in this way.