OK, I think we likely don't agree, but I'm willing to have my mind changed. So humour my simplistic questions please
RD2003.
You think the most important thing is to end the fighting, and then if so is
anything OK to give up/agree to to do this? I mean complete surrender of Ukraine to Russia might do it, is that what should be encouraged by other States and left wing movements and groups now, as that what seems to be what you're suggesting?
And what if lots of people living in Ukraine don't want to do this? Should other countries sanction Ukraine or force them to do so in other ways, and ditto to left wing groups; they should also encourage people not to fight Russia?
Or is the idea that there's some diplomatic compromise where some territory is lost to the Russian State but Ukraine keeps some? But surely that is partly dependent on Ukraine having a strong position from which to negotiate from? If Russia knows it won't fight no matter what then what do they have to negotiate with? And then is any further aggression after that also to be met with surrender/accepting whatever is demanded by the aggressors to avoid death as well?
What about if Russian occupies and then 'de-nazifies' the country by mass killings, etc? Is that also something not to fight due to risk of escalation and further deaths? And what about further invasions, surrender immediately as well? And if people don't want to live under a Russian regime, then they should just leave I assume?
Does all this apply to every country/area facing invasion and/or occupation and/or attack btw? Or is this a special case for some reason?