Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

UVF Gunrunner Lindsay Robb Murdered

Dilzybhoy said:
Google prick.

I think you'll find cases of collusion and dodgy overlap do not the same entity make.

Afterall if that was the case surely the CIA = Al Qaeda, Mossad = Hamas and MI5 = PIRA.
 
revol68 said:
I think you'll find cases of collusion and dodgy overlap do not the same entity make.

Afterall if that was the case surely the CIA = Al Qaeda, Mossad = Hamas and MI5 = PIRA.
No u misunderstand.
RUC guys were involved in the murder of innocent catholics.

Smash knows about this. And he knows I know about this.

EDIT. I'm not talking about collusion. I'm talking about actual criminal action.
And he knows who I'm talking about.
 
Dilzybhoy said:
No u misunderstand.
RUC guys were involved in the murder of innocent catholics.

Smash knows about this. And he knows I know about this.

EDIT. I'm not talking about collusion. I'm talking about actual criminal action.
And he knows who I'm talking about.

what your saying he was involved with or atleast has close associations with RUC members responsible for shooting catholics?

How in the fuck would you know this?
 
OK, let's see

Dilzybhoy said:
Your conscience is as clear as your thoughts. Not very.
Lets see now. You have been part of that organisation that called itself a "police force". That "police force" was riddled with UVF members, LOL members and sadistic bastards that thought it might be a good idea to go in a shoot up a pub on the off chance dessie o'hare just might be in the pub.
You personally knew these animals and so you are guilty by assocation.
Then of course the info passed on to your friends in the UVF/UDA, much of it false and innocent people were murdered as a result.
Your as guilty as anyone.
And you know it as well as I do.

Happy new year btw.

Appols for the spelling I've still to download a spellchecker for my new os

Riddled with UVF men. Give me some numbers here. There was a total of around 13,000 at the height of the troubles. How many were roughly UVF men, going by what you are saying it must be at least 4-5000. Hell the UVF leadership must be shocked by that one and pretty pissed that they did not collect their membership fees!!
The RUC was the most dangerous police job in the world, PERIOD!!! Worse than el Salvador. It's hardly suprising that there were a few bad ones.
If you have to sit around and watch your family and friends murdered and terrorised on a daily basis and watch while they get away with doing it, it's just suprising there were not alot more involved. Perhaps you could explain how and why there were so many UVF/UDA men arrested and charged with terrorist offences if the RUC was just an exntension of that grouping? Over 85% of loyalist crimes were solved and the terrorists put away. Compare that with only 5% of republican terrorists in the Tyrone region. Surely, if the RUC were just terrorists, then they would have had no hesitation in just going up and shooting these republican terrorists in the streets or in their home.

It shows enormous restraint and great policing to allow that. You show me another police force in the world that would allow that to happen. Sadistic bastards????? That's a bit rich coming from someone that supports people that carried out the murder and torture of a 62 year old Belfast woman, or the murder of ten innocent workmen at a roadside in Kingsmill for the horrendous crime of being a protestant.

You have got all your 'facts' from reading books and various pieces of republican propaganda, pity you were not around in the 70's or 80's I worked with a Catholic from Andersonstown who had joined, first the RUC reserve then went onto the full time police. More balls than you will have or your IRA friends here. Never allowed to go home to see his parents or family, living in fear that the IRA will kill his parents or sisters because of the job he has taken!! Couragous guy, something you will never be, or tollbar. His parents were the nicest people you could ever meet, fully supportive of what their son had done.

Perhaps you could post up some facts or figures as to the amount of UVF men in the force you say was 'riddled' with paramilitaries Some proof instead of propaganda would be nice. Surely you've read a book that gives you these figures, or did you just make it up

Oh yes, happy new year to you tas well, long live Georgie
 
Dilzybhoy said:
No u misunderstand.
RUC guys were involved in the murder of innocent catholics.

Smash knows about this. And he knows I know about this.

EDIT. I'm not talking about collusion. I'm talking about actual criminal action.
And he knows who I'm talking about.

Tell me which ones. do you mean the young guy that was seriousely depressed and walked into the Sinn Fein office and killed three republicans and then took his own life? What other innocent catholics did they deliberately set out to kill on terrorist missions Dilzy

Hurry up and read some more books and let me know
 
well yes the RUC in general acted with a high degree of reserve (compared to anyother police force in similar circumstances) but lets not overlook their role in a) bringing on the troubles b) perpeuating it and the big one c) Special Branch.
 
revol68 said:
what your saying he was involved with or atleast has close associations with RUC members responsible for shooting catholics?

How in the fuck would you know this?
I'll deal with this first.
Because he told me.
 
see the problem I have with republicans is that they like to talk about the "War" and how alot of nasty things happen during a war and they are regretable and need to be put in the past etc etc. But when the British took the gloves off abit and shot a few of them we have never heard the fucking end of it.
 
It would

revol68 said:
see the problem I have with republicans is that they like to talk about the "War" and how alot of nasty things happen during a war and they are regretable and need to be put in the past etc etc. But when the British took the gloves off abit and shot a few of them we have never heard the fucking end of it.

appear that the RUC, Army and in general the law abiding public were supposed to stand around, do nothing, get shot and not complain. It was a war but only one side was allowed to fight. Republican tactics I believe
 
smash_g8 said:
Tell me which ones. do you mean the young guy that was seriously depressed and walked into the Sinn Fein office and killed three republicans and then took his own life? What other innocent catholics did they deliberately set out to kill on terrorist missions Dilzy

Hurry up and read some more books and let me know
Now I meant your collogues. Ag fuck it you know what I'm on about. I repeat. You were as guilty as those hay done the deeds.
You know who and what I'm talking about.
Kingsmill? What do you think was the incident that induced that incident???

I'd respect you more if you looked more closely ar yourself.


Oh and fuck off revol. Twat
 
smash_g8 said:
appear that the RUC, Army and in general the law abiding public were supposed to stand around, do nothing, get shot and not complain. It was a war but only one side was allowed to fight. Republican tactics I believe

Maybe the government should set up a special fund to care for and treat ex-IRA men who are still suffering from the post traumatic stress that was brought about when they learned that the police and the army would shoot back?
 
Dilzybhoy said:
SHOW ME THE EVIDENCE

Evidence?

Well it is obvious when you appreciate the immense sagacity and profound insight in your posts.

I don't know how your brain cells manage...
 
Dilzybhoy said:
Now I meant your collogues. Ag fuck it you know what I'm on about.

I'd respect you more if you looked more closely ar yourself.


Oh and fuck off revol. Twat

you been drinkin' again young man???? :eek:
 
smash_g8 said:
You could offer up the press cuttings and some facts that they were meeting in the fish and chip hours earlier? They were not, they had actually met in a coffee shop further down the road towards the city center. Get your facts right before trying to justify the murder of 10 innocent people. Those people were always going to die. They went in with a bomb and an 11 second fuse, only the bombers were going to escape. They also knew that lots more innocent catholics were going to die in retaliation attacks after the bomb, in fact 17 in total. But then again, protecting the innocent catholic population was never high on the IRA's agenda was it What was your rack in the IRA tollbar? Chief armchair Lt?
I do seem to remember this to be the case but it is still no justification for planting the bomb amongst civilians and 'hoping' you get your target.
 
revol68 said:
what your saying he was involved with or atleast has close associations with RUC members responsible for shooting catholics?

How in the fuck would you know this?
I repeat. He fucking told me!!! :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
 
revol68 said:
o jaysus if you think the UVF and RUC are the same thing you really do have a nuanced grasp of northern irish history.

arsehole.

What about the RUC man, convicted of the murder of the Reavy brothers who could see no contridiction with being in both.
 
smash_g8 said:
to see if you thought one side of murdering scum was better than the other. and I was correct

Why did you want to know that ?. notable that you say nothing of the murdering scum of the British army, RUC UDR, RIR and their subsections, The same Murdering scum operating under their fucking Butchers Apron and with their political masters, who created the conditions that gave birth to all the others anyway. What I find interesting is that someone starts a thread regarding the demise of loyalist tout, provacateur, and drug dealer, Robb, who seems to have had connections to most of the above and whose knowledge of the workings of said parties and where the bodies were buried, figuratively and possibly otherwise, could have led to his demise, very conveniently at a time when there are renewed discussions about the conditions for the return of OTRs and mutterings about truth and reconcilliation commissions.

It makes me wonder about the intentions of said derailers and whose interests they might be serving.
 
are you

tollbar said:
Why did you want to know that ?. notable that you say nothing of the murdering scum of the British army, RUC UDR, RIR and their subsections, The same Murdering scum operating under their fucking Butchers Apron and with their political masters, who created the conditions that gave birth to all the others anyway. What I find interesting is that someone starts a thread regarding the demise of loyalist tout, provacateur, and drug dealer, Robb, who seems to have had connections to most of the above and whose knowledge of the workings of said parties and where the bodies were buried, figuratively and possibly otherwise, could have led to his demise, very conveniently at a time when there are renewed discussions about the conditions for the return of OTRs and mutterings about truth and reconcilliation commissions.

It makes me wonder about the intentions of said derailers and whose interests they might be serving.

Jazzzz (Dr).

I think you over estimate Mr Robb

I understand now, thanks for the explanation. It was the British armies fault that the Shankill road bomb went off, it's all clear now.

Given that McGuiness was less than honest at the Bloody Sunday hearings I think the T and R hearings would be a complete waste of time

Were you, like Dilzy, against the RUC and British army fighting back when they came under attack?
 
foggypane said:
A source of mine was with a Scottsh regiment whose members had a substantial minority of catholics. He told me this tale - the RUC and UDR refused to take orders from 'green bastard' officers, and to patrol with 'fucking taig' soldiers. They were also suspected on strong evidence of passing times of patrols and even personal details of catholic soldiers to the Nationalist side.
That has the ring of truth. There's a silent minority of non-sectarian folk of both sorts in the 6C and there certainly were a fair batch of roaring bigots in the UDR and to lesser extent the RUC who had the realirty check of seeing their own side at its worst. I've heard of instances of Catholic or less than Staunchly Orange RUC men being fatally touted out to PIRA by their fellow officers.

I'd add the locals working with the British military didn't take kindly to being ordered about by transient and often bewildered but consistently arrogant mainlanders either. A deep distrust of Irish Catholics serving in the British Army and the Garda and RUC was also sometimes justified, PIRA had its assets in them all.
 
^

Yep. The British army assets in NI/Ulster/6C were constantly befuddled due to the things you mention. The transient nature of most units, with the keenness to get 'results' by junior commanders, was a real problem and mitigated against {in my view} any long term thinking towards solving problems, rather than short/medium term crisis management. In 'crisis management' i would include practically every project, plan, operation of the British Army from 1969 to the mid 90s, as the whole strategy was one of kno king 'terrorist' groups down. The obvious and enlightened course is to remove the reason for the terrorism to be there - a political course, naturally, but one that could have been aided by the military in various positive ways.

These threads on U75 are a bit depressing aren't they? Witness smash-g8 and tollbar blithering on about who did what atrocity. people really do seem unable to accept that blowing up bystanders, and gunning down suspects, are wrong. It's impossible to argue with them either, if you say a plain statement of fact such as 'irish nationalists planted a bomb which killed a schoolboy in Warrington', you get attacked.

'Ah, but, it was the Brits fault, see, they were fighting the war against opressors...' blah de blah.

Or, say, 'the Army carried out illegal operations against terrorist suspects'

you get.. 'well, the rules were too restrictive, the IRA scum needed sorting, blah de blah.'

Bunch of fucking apologists.
 
I presume you

foggypane said:
^

Yep. The British army assets in NI/Ulster/6C were constantly befuddled due to the things you mention. The transient nature of most units, with the keenness to get 'results' by junior commanders, was a real problem and mitigated against {in my view} any long term thinking towards solving problems, rather than short/medium term crisis management. In 'crisis management' i would include practically every project, plan, operation of the British Army from 1969 to the mid 90s, as the whole strategy was one of kno king 'terrorist' groups down. The obvious and enlightened course is to remove the reason for the terrorism to be there - a political course, naturally, but one that could have been aided by the military in various positive ways.

These threads on U75 are a bit depressing aren't they? Witness smash-g8 and tollbar blithering on about who did what atrocity. people really do seem unable to accept that blowing up bystanders, and gunning down suspects, are wrong. It's impossible to argue with them either, if you say a plain statement of fact such as 'irish nationalists planted a bomb which killed a schoolboy in Warrington', you get attacked.

'Ah, but, it was the Brits fault, see, they were fighting the war against opressors...' blah de blah.

Or, say, 'the Army carried out illegal operations against terrorist suspects'

you get.. 'well, the rules were too restrictive, the IRA scum needed sorting, blah de blah.'

Bunch of fucking apologists.

you, like me were born and raised in Northern Ireland and lived there for 30 years during the 70's and 80's. Or, are you talking as an expert who looked in from the outside. I do accept that blowing up and killing innocent bystanders was wrong (by both sides as I stated) That I never denied.
 
smash_g8 said:
you, like me were born and raised in Northern Ireland and lived there for 30 years during the 70's and 80's. Or, are you talking as an expert who looked in from the outside. I do accept that blowing up and killing innocent bystanders was wrong (by both sides as I stated) That I never denied.

Many apologies. i was lumping you in with the various apologists who pop up on these threads.

I am an outsider - although I've worked over there a fair bit. hence my interest.

BTW, I was under the impression that the NI education system was a cut above ours on the mainland,

Here's a maths question from gcse maths 1999:

how many years are there in the 1970s/80s?

a) 20
b) 30
c) eleven?

:)
 
smash_g8 said:
Jazzzz (Dr).


Were you, like Dilzy, against the RUC and British army fighting back when they came under attack?
I was never against them fighting back. I was against them starting it in the first place and then moaning about "our hands being tied".
I was against them fighting with impunity that was never afforded the republicans.
I was against the RUC being run by factions within the lol.
I was against british "soldiers" being there at all. The ones I know should be in carstaiars or Barlinnie or indeed Peterhead with all the other beasts.

I would have supported a UN peacekeeping force with no affiliations to Orange organisations in Scotland or northern england.

But that would have been to easy.
So in the absence of a peacekeeping force then, reluctingly, I supported the provos.

Honestly smash, you know me better than that.

Again, forgive spelling mistakes. :oops:
 
Amusing as always Dilzybhoy

I was against them fighting with impunity that was never afforded the republicans. Fighting with impunity??? Impunity to what? Check the records matey. 53 shootings by the RUC in 30 yrs. Can't think of any that were unjustified although I'm sure you can!!! I don't recall any incidents of RUC men going out on duty with the sole intention of killing republicans apart from that one off duty officer I mentioned. Over 300 of their own dead at the hands of the IRA. That to me shows remarkable restraintI was against the RUC being run by factions within the lol. Namely who please. I don't recall any member of the LOL giving me or anyone I knew orders. But obviousely you have read in a book somehwere that they did so please let me know who was giving the orders. Names please, there's a good boy

Honestly smash, you know me better than that.

Again, forgive spelling mistakes. :oops:[/QUOTE]
 
Sounds like a trick question but

I would have to say 20


foggypane said:
Many apologies. i was lumping you in with the various apologists who pop up on these threads.

I am an outsider - although I've worked over there a fair bit. hence my interest.

BTW, I was under the impression that the NI education system was a cut above ours on the mainland, Well, we produced Georgie Best, Alex Higgins and Joey Dunlop. All 3 the best in the world at their chosen sports and fully qualified AA members
Here's a maths question from gcse maths 1999:

how many years are there in the 1970s/80s?

a) 20
b) 30
c) eleven?

:)
 
Dilzybhoy said:
.

I would have supported a UN peacekeeping force with no affiliations to Orange organisations in Scotland or northern england.

But that would have been to easy.
So in the absence of a peacekeeping force then, reluctingly, I supported the provos.

Honestly smash, you know me better than that.

Again, forgive spelling mistakes. :oops:


IIRC there was a serious proposal to install a UN force about 1980. Naturally, the British govt. didn't entertain the idea. Can't remember who proposed it - just a flurry of headlines and a cartoon or 2.


I think you are over stating the 'affiliation' to the satsumas by the British army.

Most soldiers of my acquaintance really couldn't give a flying fuck about NI/6C, nor in fact the island as a whole. They were there on orders and carried out those orders. The nature of soldiering produced a fair bit of brutality. Had the troops been in to protect catholics rather than the status quo, the troops would have done exactly that, and prob ably in much the same way. Hardly anyone on the mainland, practically none in the Army, care the tiniest bit about the various sects and cults that make up your provincial political and cultural life. Honest.
 
Back
Top Bottom