revol68
what, fucking what?
Dilzybhoy said:Google prick.
I think you'll find cases of collusion and dodgy overlap do not the same entity make.
Afterall if that was the case surely the CIA = Al Qaeda, Mossad = Hamas and MI5 = PIRA.
Dilzybhoy said:Google prick.
No u misunderstand.revol68 said:I think you'll find cases of collusion and dodgy overlap do not the same entity make.
Afterall if that was the case surely the CIA = Al Qaeda, Mossad = Hamas and MI5 = PIRA.
Dilzybhoy said:No u misunderstand.
RUC guys were involved in the murder of innocent catholics.
Smash knows about this. And he knows I know about this.
EDIT. I'm not talking about collusion. I'm talking about actual criminal action.
And he knows who I'm talking about.
Dilzybhoy said:Your conscience is as clear as your thoughts. Not very.
Lets see now. You have been part of that organisation that called itself a "police force". That "police force" was riddled with UVF members, LOL members and sadistic bastards that thought it might be a good idea to go in a shoot up a pub on the off chance dessie o'hare just might be in the pub.
You personally knew these animals and so you are guilty by assocation.
Then of course the info passed on to your friends in the UVF/UDA, much of it false and innocent people were murdered as a result.
Your as guilty as anyone.
And you know it as well as I do.
Happy new year btw.
Appols for the spelling I've still to download a spellchecker for my new os
Dilzybhoy said:No u misunderstand.
RUC guys were involved in the murder of innocent catholics.
Smash knows about this. And he knows I know about this.
EDIT. I'm not talking about collusion. I'm talking about actual criminal action.
And he knows who I'm talking about.
I'll deal with this first.revol68 said:what your saying he was involved with or atleast has close associations with RUC members responsible for shooting catholics?
How in the fuck would you know this?
revol68 said:see the problem I have with republicans is that they like to talk about the "War" and how alot of nasty things happen during a war and they are regretable and need to be put in the past etc etc. But when the British took the gloves off abit and shot a few of them we have never heard the fucking end of it.
Now I meant your collogues. Ag fuck it you know what I'm on about. I repeat. You were as guilty as those hay done the deeds.smash_g8 said:Tell me which ones. do you mean the young guy that was seriously depressed and walked into the Sinn Fein office and killed three republicans and then took his own life? What other innocent catholics did they deliberately set out to kill on terrorist missions Dilzy
Hurry up and read some more books and let me know
smash_g8 said:appear that the RUC, Army and in general the law abiding public were supposed to stand around, do nothing, get shot and not complain. It was a war but only one side was allowed to fight. Republican tactics I believe
Dilzybhoy said:Oh and fuck off revol. Twat
SHOW ME THE EVIDENCEfanta said:Wow!
The Dilzybhoy brain cells are working fast and furious today!
Dilzybhoy said:SHOW ME THE EVIDENCE
Dilzybhoy said:SHOW ME THE EVIDENCE
Dilzybhoy said:Now I meant your collogues. Ag fuck it you know what I'm on about.
I'd respect you more if you looked more closely ar yourself.
Oh and fuck off revol. Twat
I do seem to remember this to be the case but it is still no justification for planting the bomb amongst civilians and 'hoping' you get your target.smash_g8 said:You could offer up the press cuttings and some facts that they were meeting in the fish and chip hours earlier? They were not, they had actually met in a coffee shop further down the road towards the city center. Get your facts right before trying to justify the murder of 10 innocent people. Those people were always going to die. They went in with a bomb and an 11 second fuse, only the bombers were going to escape. They also knew that lots more innocent catholics were going to die in retaliation attacks after the bomb, in fact 17 in total. But then again, protecting the innocent catholic population was never high on the IRA's agenda was it What was your rack in the IRA tollbar? Chief armchair Lt?
Always try to please my little loyalist friend.smash_g8 said:this cracked me up, if nothing else you're good for a laugh
I repeat. He fucking told me!!!revol68 said:what your saying he was involved with or atleast has close associations with RUC members responsible for shooting catholics?
How in the fuck would you know this?
revol68 said:o jaysus if you think the UVF and RUC are the same thing you really do have a nuanced grasp of northern irish history.
arsehole.
smash_g8 said:to see if you thought one side of murdering scum was better than the other. and I was correct
tollbar said:Why did you want to know that ?. notable that you say nothing of the murdering scum of the British army, RUC UDR, RIR and their subsections, The same Murdering scum operating under their fucking Butchers Apron and with their political masters, who created the conditions that gave birth to all the others anyway. What I find interesting is that someone starts a thread regarding the demise of loyalist tout, provacateur, and drug dealer, Robb, who seems to have had connections to most of the above and whose knowledge of the workings of said parties and where the bodies were buried, figuratively and possibly otherwise, could have led to his demise, very conveniently at a time when there are renewed discussions about the conditions for the return of OTRs and mutterings about truth and reconcilliation commissions.
It makes me wonder about the intentions of said derailers and whose interests they might be serving.
That has the ring of truth. There's a silent minority of non-sectarian folk of both sorts in the 6C and there certainly were a fair batch of roaring bigots in the UDR and to lesser extent the RUC who had the realirty check of seeing their own side at its worst. I've heard of instances of Catholic or less than Staunchly Orange RUC men being fatally touted out to PIRA by their fellow officers.foggypane said:A source of mine was with a Scottsh regiment whose members had a substantial minority of catholics. He told me this tale - the RUC and UDR refused to take orders from 'green bastard' officers, and to patrol with 'fucking taig' soldiers. They were also suspected on strong evidence of passing times of patrols and even personal details of catholic soldiers to the Nationalist side.
foggypane said:^
Yep. The British army assets in NI/Ulster/6C were constantly befuddled due to the things you mention. The transient nature of most units, with the keenness to get 'results' by junior commanders, was a real problem and mitigated against {in my view} any long term thinking towards solving problems, rather than short/medium term crisis management. In 'crisis management' i would include practically every project, plan, operation of the British Army from 1969 to the mid 90s, as the whole strategy was one of kno king 'terrorist' groups down. The obvious and enlightened course is to remove the reason for the terrorism to be there - a political course, naturally, but one that could have been aided by the military in various positive ways.
These threads on U75 are a bit depressing aren't they? Witness smash-g8 and tollbar blithering on about who did what atrocity. people really do seem unable to accept that blowing up bystanders, and gunning down suspects, are wrong. It's impossible to argue with them either, if you say a plain statement of fact such as 'irish nationalists planted a bomb which killed a schoolboy in Warrington', you get attacked.
'Ah, but, it was the Brits fault, see, they were fighting the war against opressors...' blah de blah.
Or, say, 'the Army carried out illegal operations against terrorist suspects'
you get.. 'well, the rules were too restrictive, the IRA scum needed sorting, blah de blah.'
Bunch of fucking apologists.
smash_g8 said:you, like me were born and raised in Northern Ireland and lived there for 30 years during the 70's and 80's. Or, are you talking as an expert who looked in from the outside. I do accept that blowing up and killing innocent bystanders was wrong (by both sides as I stated) That I never denied.
I was never against them fighting back. I was against them starting it in the first place and then moaning about "our hands being tied".smash_g8 said:Jazzzz (Dr).
Were you, like Dilzy, against the RUC and British army fighting back when they came under attack?
foggypane said:Many apologies. i was lumping you in with the various apologists who pop up on these threads.
I am an outsider - although I've worked over there a fair bit. hence my interest.
BTW, I was under the impression that the NI education system was a cut above ours on the mainland, Well, we produced Georgie Best, Alex Higgins and Joey Dunlop. All 3 the best in the world at their chosen sports and fully qualified AA members
Here's a maths question from gcse maths 1999:
how many years are there in the 1970s/80s?
a) 20
b) 30
c) eleven?
Dilzybhoy said:.
I would have supported a UN peacekeeping force with no affiliations to Orange organisations in Scotland or northern england.
But that would have been to easy.
So in the absence of a peacekeeping force then, reluctingly, I supported the provos.
Honestly smash, you know me better than that.
Again, forgive spelling mistakes.