gamma globulins
plinky plonky
Yeah, George Bush saw the same bounce. Doesn't make him "not a twat" as far as history is concerned.
Those who demand anti-war activity here in Britain against Russia are ignoring the history and the present reality in Ukraine and Crimea. The B52 liberals only oppose wars when their own rulers do so, and support the ones carried out by our governments. The job of any anti-war movement is to oppose its own government's role in these wars, and to explain what that government and its allies are up to.
• Downing Street rejected suggestions that Britain was being less belligerent than the US because of the fear that Russia could retaliate by cutting off gas supplies to Europe.
This from Lyndesy German of Counterfire and Stop the War (not this one, this ones cracking) is astonishing:
And non facists.Can't find image but Hague has just laid flowers to the Maidan dead which undoubtedly include fascists.
and?And non facists.
It's a call for humanitatian imperialist intervention by Russia to protect the russian speakers in Crimea and east Ukraine. There is nothing left for these people now they embrace this sort of view. It demonstrates how lightly held their previous no imperilaist intervention anywhere, how neither moscow nor washington was actually just the usual crude imperialism in with a fancy gloss.Bizzarro!
And non facists.
Can't find image but Hague has just laid flowers to the Maidan dead which undoubtedly include fascists.
And you know, people. People who were there, either on the orders of the previous government, or because they believed that something better could take its place.
Can't find image but Hague has just laid flowers to the Maidan dead which undoubtedly include fascists.
Hague was speaking from Kiev, where he was meeting Ukrainian leaders in an act of solidarity before attending a meeting of EU foreign ministers in Brussels.
Liable to have been some blue on blue there tooHere's a list of those murdered by the state.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_killed_during_Euromaidan
It's a call for humanitatian imperialist intervention by Russia to protect the russian speakers in Crimea and east Ukraine. There is nothing left for these people now they embrace this sort of view. It demonstrates how lightly held their previous no imperilaist intervention anywhere, how neither moscow nor washington was actually just the usual crude imperialism in with a fancy gloss.
That was my first thought but then i couldn't recall them doing stuff for them - for the iranian regime, sure, but rt stuff, couldn't remember.I wonder if German and Rees are after a few more gigs at RT?
That was my first thought but then i couldn't recall them doing stuff for them - for the iranian regime, sure, but rt stuff, couldn't remember.
How sweet, 'against military intervention'. Good find.He's been on there at least http://www.counterfire.org/news/11322-against-military-intervention-john-rees-on-russia-today
Someone on Rees' facebook is quoting Chomsky to defend the uncritically pro-Russian position
"My own concern is primarily the terror and violence carried out by my own state, for two reasons. For one thing, because it happens to be the larger component of international violence. But also for a much more important reason than that; namely, I can do something about it. So even if the U.S. was responsible for 2 percent of the violence in the world instead of the majority of it, it would be that 2 percent I would be primarily responsible for. And that is a simple ethical judgment. That is, the ethical value of one’s actions depends on their anticipated and predictable consequences. It is very easy to denounce the atrocities of someone else. That has about as much ethical value as denouncing atrocities that took place in the 18th century."
...which is fine but he said primarily, not exclusively.
really starting to see the fruits of the utter bullshit that has been reported on Ukraine in recent weeks.
lots of people coming to this story for first time with a totally bogus perspective on it, shouting hysterically without a clue of what really took place. this includes clueless prominent journalists and pundits. there are also cynical ones too, playing the game.
all very dangerous - both sides now totally at odds with eachother in interpretation, and perception of who holds moral authority.
this has already begun to manifest itself in this inane 'obama/ putin (okay, not yet) / cameron/ miliband/ whoever' is weak crap, which pushes them into making more and more pathetic boisterous statements and chestpuffing. (this in turn must give false hope to Ukrainian nationalists, who get more and more worked up too). where this ends is anyones guess.
anyone enjoying this needs a dunces hat.
How sweet, 'against military intervention'. Good find.
Someone on Rees' facebook is quoting Chomsky to defend the uncritically pro-Russian position ...which is fine but he said primarily, not exclusively.
Bloody good question - and given he normally makes max effort to let everyone know what he thinks, his silence thus far (if that is what is) may be revealing. When it comes, i think you have it right.Has Gorgeous George blown any hot air on RT yet?
I expect his take on the situation will be a mix of Lord Haw Haw and 1970's Radio Moscow...