Yes but the Central government is still calling it unconstitutional (clause 20 Article 92 of the constitution)
1) Thanks for that. In English that clause is:
"The following are determined exclusively by the laws of Ukraine: . . . 20. the organization and procedure for conducting elections and referendums;"
It's the same clause & wording in both Constitutions:
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Constitution_of_Ukraine,_2010 (the one effective before Saturday's amendments)
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Constitution_of_Ukraine,_2004 (the one effective after them)
By law does Crimea Rada have the authority to call a referendum for the Autonomous Republic? Or does it need permission from an authority like the UA Rada, or the UA Rada writing a new law?
2) Just a point on acting within the law, here the matter of respecting the constitution. The Constitution of UA existing Friday last week (nor the one chosen the next day), had no way of changing the President by a vote alone in the Rada: what it did on Saturday (before changing the Constitution) was unconstitutional. If the President is in fact impeached there is a process, the famed due process all liberal democrats & constitutional socialists love. Obviously in this the impeached person has the right to challenge evidence supporting the impeachment. But this was denied to him - as so often happens, political control trumps the rule of law.
For information I give the whole of the 2 relevant articles, 108 & 111, of last Friday's Constitution, before it was changed the next day:
"The President of Ukraine exercises his or her powers until the assumption of office by the newly-elected President of Ukraine.
"The powers of the President of Ukraine terminate prior to the expiration of term in cases of:
1. resignation;
2. inability to exercise his or her powers for reasons of health;
3. removal from office by the procedure of impeachment;
4. death."
§111, detailing the impeachment process:
"The President of Ukraine may be removed from office by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine by the procedure of impeachment, in the event that he or she commits state treason or other crime.
The issue of the removal of the President of Ukraine from office by the procedure of impeachment is initiated by the majority of the constitutional composition of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine.
To conduct
the investigation, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine establishes a special temporary investigatory commission whose composition includes a special procurator and special investigators.
The conclusions and proposals of the temporary investigatory commission
are considered at a meeting of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine.
For cause, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, by no less than two-thirds of its constitutional composition, adopts a decision on the accusation of the President of Ukraine.
The decision on the removal of the President of Ukraine from office by the procedure of impeachment is adopted by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine by no less than three-quarters of its constitutional composition,
after the review of the case by the Constitutional Court of Ukraine and the receipt of its opinion on the observance of the constitutional procedure of investigation and consideration of the case of impeachment,
and the receipt of the opinion of the Supreme Court of Ukraine to the effect that the acts, of which the President of Ukraine is accused, contain elements of state treason or other crime." (I added the highlights)
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Constitution_of_Ukraine,_2010
3) Obviously what has happened since the agreement of last Friday afternoon has been a blow to the state, a coup. The new constitution means there's a new regime, the state has changed form, & in that sense it has been a political revolution. Foot soldiers in achieving this were the Ukrainian nationalists influenced by fascist history & symbolism. German conservatives & nationalists, not just the small group milieu from which the Hitlerist NSDAP arose, always spoke of the need for a national revolution. This time in UA it has been achieved to a large extent by the boldness & perseverance of Svoboda & others.
What has not changed about the UA state is its capitalist nature. But that doesn't concern almost all the protesters & rebels. As Eastern-Odyssey just said, armed groups of Right Sektor are reported to be seizing businesses from those judged corrupt, thieves or unpatriotic, but the groups or their leaders will simply become capitalists themselves. In fact there were no reports of anyone in Maidan Square or elsewhere demanding that oligarchs & the other super-rich just pay their taxes, let alone have any of their property confiscated by the state or the famed people-in-motion.
Synagogue desecrated in Simferopol
Graffito is 'Death to Yids', the Zhids.